banananuts87 Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 That's a bad location. I sent many reports on sprint zone. That's a heavy traffic area. Airport, hotels, dmv, coast Guard base, University and schools and more in a square mile. If you look on top of the Marriott there is a lot of cell equipment from other carriers. Sprint needs a small cell there. Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk Skip the small cells. They need a macro cell site and b26/b41. Don't understand how they can offer 50% off and calls drop, data speeds are poor and horrible signal strength. All this at an airport. Sigh.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smooth25 Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 Skip the small cells. They need a macro cell site and b26/b41. Don't understand how they can offer 50% off and calls drop, data speeds are poor and horrible signal strength. All this at an airport. Sigh.... I would love a macro and b26. There's no b26 in Puerto Rico though. I can't recommend Sprint for now until all towers get upgraded here and some more sites added. Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terrell352 Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 I would love a macro and b26. There's no b26 in Puerto Rico though. I can't recommend Sprint for now until all towers get upgraded here and some more sites added. Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk Seems like GSM carriers reign supreme in Puerto Rico. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert7 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Yeah.... it seems... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
animaldoc Posted July 14, 2016 Share Posted July 14, 2016 Just spent 10 days in PR. Drove around the entire Island. Only in the SJ metro and major roads is Sprint halfway descent. Overall, it was a poor experience. Many dead and roaming areas in Humacao, Isabela and Rincon. Long way to go. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert7 Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 WHAT ABOUT B 26 ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dkoellerwx Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 WHAT ABOUT B 26 ?What about it? Sent from my LG G4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vamp07 Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 Just spent 10 days in PR. Drove around the entire Island. Only in the SJ metro and major roads is Sprint halfway descent. Overall, it was a poor experience. Many dead and roaming areas in Humacao, Isabela and Rincon. Long way to go.Exactly! Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert7 Posted July 23, 2016 Share Posted July 23, 2016 What about it? Sent from my LG G4 The auction whats the mystery..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terrell352 Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 The auction whats the mystery..?It's not happening anytime soon. I would suggest looking at other carriers in puerto rico. Most of it is single 5x5 b25. Maybe in a few years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert7 Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 Well. Mr. Son needs to start using Gilat satellites to help Sprint specially here.. Another way could be Google making a deal with local operators open mobile and claro, i think both.We need in building coverage and in the center of the island... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vamp07 Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 Well. Mr. Son needs to start using Gilat satellites to help Sprint specially here.. Another way could be Google making a deal with local operators open mobile and claro, i think both.We need in building coverage and in the center of the island...When pigs fly.. Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert7 Posted August 3, 2016 Share Posted August 3, 2016 It could happen. Are you Tmobile customer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vamp07 Posted August 3, 2016 Share Posted August 3, 2016 Yup. I'm tmobile. Been sprint in the past. Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert7 Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 Tmo not much advantage over Sprint here . They dont have low band. they use aws for 3g and lte right? more or less like Sprint Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vamp07 Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Tmo not much advantage over Sprint here . They dont have low band. they use aws for 3g and lte right? more or less like SprintBetter coverage and lte speeds that are never slow. Other then that they are very similar. Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert7 Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 BETTER COVERAGE WHERE...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert7 Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 Where do you live .? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vamp07 Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 Metro area. I have had both and that statement is definitely true. Especially when is malls and structures in general. Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vamp07 Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 Outside of Metro they also have better coverage definitely better speeds. Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert7 Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 So Sprint is hiring executives from other companies and at the same time promise to not to spend more money in the network. What is that..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozamcrew Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 I don't know where this idea is coming from that Sprint is not going to spend money on the network. It seems to come down to two things, the drop off in capital spend after much for NV 1.0 and 2.0 are completed, and the further drop off in capital spend this year beyond their projections. But there was ALWAYS going to be a drop off in capital spending once NV 1.0 was substantially completed and most of the urban sites got their 8T8R NV 2.0 gear. And the drop from this year's budget was already discussed by Sprint executives, some expenditures for small cells and 8T8R gear that was originally going to be billed this year will actually be billed in the first quarter of next year. On a fundamental level, while Sprint has some areas that aren't up to NV1.0 standards due to issues getting 800Mhz cleared, issues with GMO conversion, and sites that cannot support the equipment, most of the footprint is complete or has the equipment ready for NV1.0 once these individual issues are resolved. What is left is mostly NV2.0/Cleawire site conversion, which is well underway, and incrementally improving the quality of the existing coverage footprint with small cell deployments. Sprint has a ways to go before they are ready for macro scale coverage growth, outside of the need for license protection in areas like ND, SD, MT, and WY. The only other macro growth I can see will be organically as they move to limit the cost of roaming in certain areas. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banananuts87 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 I don't know where this idea is coming from that Sprint is not going to spend money on the network. It seems to come down to two things, the drop off in capital spend after much for NV 1.0 and 2.0 are completed, and the further drop off in capital spend this year beyond their projections. But there was ALWAYS going to be a drop off in capital spending once NV 1.0 was substantially completed and most of the urban sites got their 8T8R NV 2.0 gear. And the drop from this year's budget was already discussed by Sprint executives, some expenditures for small cells and 8T8R gear that was originally going to be billed this year will actually be billed in the first quarter of next year. On a fundamental level, while Sprint has some areas that aren't up to NV1.0 standards due to issues getting 800Mhz cleared, issues with GMO conversion, and sites that cannot support the equipment, most of the footprint is complete or has the equipment ready for NV1.0 once these individual issues are resolved. What is left is mostly NV2.0/Cleawire site conversion, which is well underway, and incrementally improving the quality of the existing coverage footprint with small cell deployments. Sprint has a ways to go before they are ready for macro scale coverage growth, outside of the need for license protection in areas like ND, SD, MT, and WY. The only other macro growth I can see will be organically as they move to limit the cost of roaming in certain areas. And backhaul... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vamp07 Posted August 19, 2016 Share Posted August 19, 2016 Regardless of spending if they can't offer you a basic lte connection that is good enough for most things they are not spending enough. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert7 Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 So Verizon add ca everywhere not just in selected cities... thats the way to go 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.