Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market


Ace41690

Recommended Posts

Is that through Transit Wireless or through their own DAS like at Grand Central?

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

I believe its through transit wireless. This station was only broadcasting B25/26 so I dont know if this was just upgraded or just turned on.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe its through transit wireless. This station was only broadcasting B25/26 so I dont know if this was just upgraded or just turned on.

If that's the case, it probably won't be long until we start seeing Band 41 in the other stations too. That's good news!

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone working in WTC 1 or visiting the Observation Deck? Curious how service is there.

Visited the observation deck when I was back home from college around Thanksgiving of 2015. Service was very bad, if I recall correctly I latched onto 1x800. No EvDo and no Band 26 to be found, and if I did latch on it was around -115 dBm for both. WiFi was free, and WiFi calling worked like a charm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Visited the observation deck when I was back home from college around Thanksgiving of 2015. Service was very bad, if I recall correctly I latched onto 1x800. No EvDo and no Band 26 to be found, and if I did latch on it was around -115 dBm for both. WiFi was free, and WiFi calling worked like a charm. 

 

Some recent changes should help that...

 

Anyone visiting now or any time soon... that is the question. ;)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Visited the observation deck when I was back home from college around Thanksgiving of 2015. Service was very bad, if I recall correctly I latched onto 1x800. No EvDo and no Band 26 to be found, and if I did latch on it was around -115 dBm for both. WiFi was free, and WiFi calling worked like a charm. 

 

Skyscrapers, especially super tall skyscrapers, are the exception, not the rule.  And terrestrial wireless service is not intended to serve the sky.  So, signal strength will be low.  Or SINR will be low -- because of the signals from so many cell sites in direct line of sight interfering with each other.  That is why many skyscrapers require their own small cells.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone noticed that since the network failure a few weeks ago, some towers have just not come back online? The Bronx has been having trouble ever since that day along the Metro-North tracks. Wakefield to Mount Vernon West is particularly bad. I reported it and they say they are investigating it and I am not the only one to notice the slow down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone noticed that since the network failure a few weeks ago, some towers have just not come back online? The Bronx has been having trouble ever since that day along the Metro-North tracks. Wakefield to Mount Vernon West is particularly bad. I reported it and they say they are investigating it and I am not the only one to notice the slow down. 

What device are you using? 

 

I cant believe I'm going to say this...

 

But have you tried a PRL and Profile update? I had some handoff issues on my N6P and that immediately fixed the issue. 

 

If that does not helps hit up @marcicarris, @marceloclaure and @sprintcare on twitter, they will get on it right away..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What device are you using? 

 

I cant believe I'm going to say this...

 

But have you tried a PRL and Profile update? I had some handoff issues on my N6P and that immediately fixed the issue. 

 

If that does not helps hit up @marcicarris, @marceloclaure and @sprintcare on twitter, they will get on it right away..

 

iPhone 6s. Yeah, the ##UPDATE# was the first thing I tried. My wife had the same issues in the same location. Luckily on the train it is only about 5 minutes long, but just sucks to have even radio drop out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the new technical COO is finally starting to get his network plan in place?

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

 

Well they lit up 900 sites with CA without a peep ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

So, I was waiting for the bus at 86th and 3rd, and decided to connect to these hot spots that are replacing phone booths.  I wanted to see how fast this "ultra fast" wifi really was... and I was impressed.  I got 229 down and 214 up.  Granted, that was standing within five feet of it, and who knows how many people were really connected.

The ISP says "CityBridge" and I'm guessing it's Verizon who is the backhaul since they are former phone booths, but who knows.

 

I picked it up all up 3rd ave between 86th and 96th.  It shows that maybe, just maybe, we can wire light poles with ease like we're hoping, for small cell deployment.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I was waiting for the bus at 86th and 3rd, and decided to connect to these hot spots that are replacing phone booths. I wanted to see how fast this "ultra fast" wifi really was... and I was impressed. I got 229 down and 214 up. Granted, that was standing within five feet of it, and who knows how many people were really connected.

The ISP says "CityBridge" and I'm guessing it's Verizon who is the backhaul since they are former phone booths, but who knows.

 

I picked it up all up 3rd ave between 86th and 96th. It shows that maybe, just maybe, we can wire light poles with ease like we're hoping, for small cell deployment.

The amount of dark fiber throughout the city is immeasurable. Much of it was laid during the 90's and has been sitting there waiting to be used for projects like this.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amount of dark fiber throughout the city is immeasurable. Much of it was laid during the 90's and has been sitting there waiting to be used for projects like this.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

That is pretty cool to hear.  Though, it'd be nice if FiOS could get into my building... hah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is pretty cool to hear. Though, it'd be nice if FiOS could get into my building... hah.

Well, Verizon installers are on strike now anyway. I just signed up and have an install date 5 weeks away... in the meantime they gave me a free unlimited LTE hotspot. Figure I'll just USB tether it to my router.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I was waiting for the bus at 86th and 3rd, and decided to connect to these hot spots that are replacing phone booths.  I wanted to see how fast this "ultra fast" wifi really was... and I was impressed.  I got 229 down and 214 up.  Granted, that was standing within five feet of it, and who knows how many people were really connected.

The ISP says "CityBridge" and I'm guessing it's Verizon who is the backhaul since they are former phone booths, but who knows.

 

I picked it up all up 3rd ave between 86th and 96th.  It shows that maybe, just maybe, we can wire light poles with ease like we're hoping, for small cell deployment.

Yeah they got a lot of Links deployed across NYC now! There's 3 on the same block as my campus, they're incredibly nice to have. The range and speeds are extremely impressive. 

 

Most of them are on 3rd and 8th avenue, and run very extensively. The ones by my college are by 24th and 3rd, so right there it covers 60 blocks on 3rd. It's really the future for NYC, I'm very happy this became a thing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...