Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Baltimore Market (including Annapolis/East Shore)


lequonrobinson

Recommended Posts

Robert, now that we have a little bit of historical information.

What is the 4G LTE tower completion rate / week in the Baltimore area. Doesn't seem to be real aggressive if you don't average in the initial roll out towers.

 

Also, I have been trying to fill in some of the LTE spots on Sensorly but that seems to be meeting with limited success.

The tower handshaking between 3g/4g/3g signals seem to struggle in the Baltimore area.

 

Washington area while traveling south on Rt 29 close to the Beltway i-495 I was getting full bars good pings around 110 but d/l speeds in the single digits. Probably 6 towers worth. Similar to when the 4G LTE was 2 weeks out in the Baltimore area. Just an observation. No scientific backup.

 

3G/4G handoffs work fine for me. Those pings & speeds are normal (sadly) for DC. DC needs NV more then we do. Even before we had NV, speeds weren't as bad as they are there now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It seems as if the rooftop sites don't broadcast very far... I've been at Security Square Mall all day, and I have a weak LTE signal. It was to my understanding that the site on the Social Security building would reach over here pretty easily. I can actually see the panels on top of the building outside, yet my signal isn't good at all.

 

N87gd.png5smMq.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems as if the rooftop sites don't broadcast very far... I've been at Security Square Mall all day, and I have a weak LTE signal. It was to my understanding that the site on the Social Security building would reach over here pretty easily. I can actually see the panels on top of the building outside, yet my signal isn't good at all.

 

Although this is a very general statement, most rooftop deployments are in very dense locations, thus downtilt is pretty severe. But this is not always the case. It is possible though that you are getting your signal from somewhere else.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although this is a very general statement, most rooftop deployments are in very dense locations, thus downtilt is pretty severe. But this is not always the case. It is possible though that you are getting your signal from somewhere else.

 

Robert

 

The closest other completed site is around 10 miles away though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The closest other completed site is around 10 miles away though.

 

You mean, the closest known site, right?

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

You mean, the closest known site, right?

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

 

Yeah. I think I found the problem. I was traveling on the beltway (I-695) and noticed I had full LTE signal. I was surprised, as I have the completed sites map memorized, and this site was certainly not listed. I could very well be getting signal from there...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yah, I would lose it at my sisters house at the corner of 97 and 140, she is in the back side of the hill from town. Soon as I popped over the hill got 4g. Like 15k down 5k up. Rest of town coverage seemed pretty good.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yah' date=' I would lose it at my sisters house at the corner of 97 and 140, she is in the back side of the hill from town. Soon as I popped over the hill got 4g. Like 15k down 5k up. Rest of town coverage seemed pretty good.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

[/quote']

 

Your sure that wasn't 15mb down 5mb up. 15k down and 5k up is a little to slow for LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, was typing fast on my phone.

 

13708 kbps up

6562 kbps down

53 ms ping

Server Fredrick, MD

 

Think I did the test from the Olive Garden in Westminster at 1 pm on 11/19.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, was typing fast on my phone.

 

13708 kbps up

6562 kbps down

53 ms ping

Server Fredrick, MD

 

Think I did the test from the Olive Garden in Westminster at 1 pm on 11/19.

 

I usually get my best speeds from the Washington, DC server. Would you be able to try that one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, I was just their visiting over Thanksgiving holiday. I'm back in Chicago and my hit or miss LTE speeds. Getting better daily though.

 

I was getting some LTE up in Hanover, PA when I was visiting my Dad, though I didn't run any speed tests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, was typing fast on my phone.

 

13708 kbps up

6562 kbps down

53 ms ping

Server Fredrick, MD

 

Think I did the test from the Olive Garden in Westminster at 1 pm on 11/19.

westminster has LTE but only a portion of it. i have two clients in westminster..one is at the fringe and one is right smack int he middle of the tower's range..:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I usually use the Baltimore server when I am in Westminster because its geographically closer as well as part of the Bmore market.

 

here are a couple of my speedtests in Westminster:

 

266956500.png

 

258121049.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...