Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - West Washington Market (Seattle/Puget Sound Region)


drlovety

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, falconhand said:

Wow! Successfully passed 2.1gbps at the Gregg's site in Bellevue. 4cc n260. Did they acquire more 260 spectrum in King County, or just some sort of STA? 

 

https://imgur.com/a/IBHqz2P

 

Shit, I am super jealous. Whioch device is that on? I tried again at Gregg's Bicycle a couple days ago and maxed out at 850Mb/s. I am beginning to think there is something with my phone (S22 Ultra), because I have never seen a speed >1Gb/s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

S22+, but I got the same speeds on my backup S21. Tested in the parking lot of the little strip mall for the best mmWave speeds. I found the best n41 speeds on the sector facing the Borgata apartments (around 1400mbps). I was surprised to see such good speeds, as I paid it a visit on Sunday while the city was busy after Seafair. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, falconhand said:

S22+, but I got the same speeds on my backup S21. Tested in the parking lot of the little strip mall for the best mmWave speeds. I found the best n41 speeds on the sector facing the Borgata apartments (around 1400mbps). I was surprised to see such good speeds, as I paid it a visit on Sunday while the city was busy after Seafair. 

Thanks for the locations, I will try them sometime in the next week or so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

Any updates on this? 

Yeah, I went up to Kitsap on Friday. Was able to connect to several n41 sites as SA only in Port Orchard, Bremerton and Silverdale.  However, I could not get any throughput.  It would say Mobile Data Suspended.  n41 NSA would throughput just fine. Was pushing 500-800 Mbps.

I don't know if it was the network at the time or my device causing the failure for data throughput. It was the exact same result on every site I connected to.  I'm on a normal Tmo Postpaid SIM.  Nothing unusual.  LG V60.

Robert

n41 SA

Screenshot_20220805-162013.png

 

n41 NSA

Screenshot_20220805-162630.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, xmx1024 said:

Did my drive from PHX to SEA & got to experience the terribleness that is the totem lake area. Impressive, speed test didn't complete either time.
image.thumb.png.00c6557791cbef689f37ff1323eb8c67.pngimage.thumb.png.f8991d71396fd4d3bc75fbf5b712e521.png

Not a good look...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, xmx1024 said:

Did my drive from PHX to SEA & got to experience the terribleness that is the totem lake area. Impressive, speed test didn't complete either time.
image.thumb.png.00c6557791cbef689f37ff1323eb8c67.pngimage.thumb.png.f8991d71396fd4d3bc75fbf5b712e521.png

 

5 minutes ago, clbowens said:

Not a good look...

I can almost guarantee that is because of the upgraded co-lo. If I'm band locked to n41, it will kick me off.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/18/2022 at 5:46 AM, PedroDaGr8 said:

 

I can almost guarantee that is because of the upgraded co-lo. If I'm band locked to n41, it will kick me off.

That’s likely it. This is taken fairly close to the totem lake freeway station, just south of it on 405 I believe. That was a day of 13 hours worth of driving so I could be wrong but I do remember it was in Totem Lake Lake.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tower at the 405/5 interchange in Lynnwood is FINALLY live. I didn't get a chance to do a speedtest because I was driving with the wife. 

Also, a bunch of Dish pre-submission "permits" just dropped for Kirkland. Looks like they are taking over the old Sprint mini-macro site on the Portsmith building in downtown. The one over on Evergreen is expected to have FOUR antennas and 8 RRUs per sector! First time, I have seen that setup mentioned. 

https://permitsearch.mybuildingpermit.com/PermitDetails/PRE22-00597/Kirkland

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

The tower at the 405/5 interchange in Lynnwood is FINALLY live. I didn't get a chance to do a speedtest because I was driving with the wife. 

Also, a bunch of Dish pre-submission "permits" just dropped for Kirkland. Looks like they are taking over the old Sprint mini-macro site on the Portsmith building in downtown. The one over on Evergreen is expected to have FOUR antennas and 8 RRUs per sector! First time, I have seen that setup mentioned. 

https://permitsearch.mybuildingpermit.com/PermitDetails/PRE22-00597/Kirkland

I was there and I thought so, I will say that data was ROUGH at Alderwood mall on the 14th. I speculated the Pylon site was still online. Pretty much the same experience as the Totem Lake screenshots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, falconhand said:

N25 live in Seattle downtown, checking Kitsap tonight, will update. Speeds 60/40 on 10x10 carrier, also sighted aggregating with n41 SA as PCC. 

 

 

Great to see this n25 confirmation. They used it in recent speed tests so I finally updated my profile image of intersecting circles from b41 b25 b26 to n41 n25 n71 and added 5g early yesterday.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, falconhand said:

N25 live in Seattle downtown, checking Kitsap tonight, will update. Speeds 60/40 on 10x10 carrier, also sighted aggregating with n41 SA as PCC. 

 

 

Damn! Figures, they turn on n25 the day I leave for a three week vacation! I figured that n25 would go live soon, since Tmo had changed the Sprints B25 frequency. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are any SCP users heading to the Pacific Beach area any time soon? We don’t have much SCP data on site 351408/351409 (especially along 109 and Moclips highway) and I’m trying to decide whether or not to make a trip out there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I won't be headed that way in the near future, wish I could though. Would love to map & speedtest that new site! 

 

Also, a friend and I visited the Gregg's site again and hit nearly 3gbps on the 4cc n260. Impressive optimization! There was also someone working on the tower while we were there, possibly installing AWEUC/D n258?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/28/2022 at 8:58 PM, RAvirani said:

Are any SCP users heading to the Pacific Beach area any time soon? We don’t have much SCP data on site 351408/351409 (especially along 109 and Moclips highway) and I’m trying to decide whether or not to make a trip out there!

I am in Ocean Shores on Monday.  I want to make a loop out of it and swing up to Pacific Beach.  I am not certain if I will be able to or not, yet.

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/28/2022 at 8:58 PM, RAvirani said:

Are any SCP users heading to the Pacific Beach area any time soon? We don’t have much SCP data on site 351408/351409 (especially along 109 and Moclips highway) and I’m trying to decide whether or not to make a trip out there!

I could not get north of Pacific Beach.  I had my elderly parents with me and they were complaining that they needed to get back after we left Roosevelt Beach.  So my loop only was 109 north from Ocean Shores and back to Hoquiam along Ocean Beach Road.  However, my wife is out of town Friday night.  I may go back if I do not have any schedule conflicts with my kids.

But I did discover 350518/350519 is now live.  The Sprint Retain site near Grays Harbor City between Hoquiam and Ocean Shores.

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/28/2022 at 8:58 PM, RAvirani said:

Are any SCP users heading to the Pacific Beach area any time soon? We don’t have much SCP data on site 351408/351409 (especially along 109 and Moclips highway) and I’m trying to decide whether or not to make a trip out there!

I went back and mapped it after work Thursday night.  I drove up the 101 through Neilton and a few miles past Amanda Park, then down the Moclips Highway, up WA-109 to Taholah, down to Seabrook (and out the back of the development), over to Copalis Crossing, up Kirkpatrick Road to Humptulips and down to Hoquiam out to the Airport Peninsula to pick up the new site near Grays Harbor City.

In my travels, I solidly got a signal from the site west of Amanda Park and the new Pacific Beach site along Moclips Hwy, in the town of Moclips and along Kirkpatrick Road.  I also got the new Grays Harbor City site on the WA-109 Bypass around Hoquiam solidly.  But none of those coverages are showing on the map.  But other coverages from the journey has appeared.  It's really weird.  The signal was definitely strong enough to map.  I re-uploaded by adjusting the timestamp, just in case.  Not appearing.

This happened the first time I mapped the Pacific Beach site too.  It like immediately half mapped my coverage, but then a few days later the rest appeared on the map.  All without the Last Seen date changing.  Not sure why that occurred.  Hopefully it does show up.

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, S4GRU said:

This happened the first time I mapped the Pacific Beach site too.  It like immediately half mapped my coverage, but then a few days later the rest appeared on the map.  All without the Last Seen date changing.  Not sure why that occurred.  Hopefully it does show up.

Robert

I’ll take a look when I get back to my hotel tonight. Busy at the US Open :)!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting—I see the data in my DB, but the map is rejecting it.

The map doesn’t display signals worse than -118, so some of the missing data makes sense, but it looks like there are some stronger data points that are missing as well. I’ll have to investigate what’s going on there…

https://imgur.com/a/IgHY90f

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, RAvirani said:

Very interesting—I see the data in my DB, but the map is rejecting it.

The map doesn’t display signals worse than -118, so some of the missing data makes sense, but it looks like there are some stronger data points that are missing as well. I’ll have to investigate what’s going on there…

https://imgur.com/a/IgHY90f

Good!  I'm glad I'm not crazy.  This isn't the first time I've suspected it.  But it's one of the most egregious. It was such a deliberate drive and I was watching SCP very closely.  Thanks for looking into it.

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
On 8/9/2022 at 12:32 PM, falconhand said:

S22+, but I got the same speeds on my backup S21. Tested in the parking lot of the little strip mall for the best mmWave speeds. I found the best n41 speeds on the sector facing the Borgata apartments (around 1400mbps). I was surprised to see such good speeds, as I paid it a visit on Sunday while the city was busy after Seafair. 

Finally broke 1gig! We stopped by the Ramen place and I locked my phone to LTE+n261 and got 1.1Gbps. This is despite me being deprioritized (over 50Gb this month) and it being CRAZY crowded today. The park is jam packed.

  • Love 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...