Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - West Washington Market (Seattle/Puget Sound Region)


drlovety

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

It appears T-Mobile is pushing forward with upgrading the Totem Lake Motel 6 site SMDH. I really hoped they would change their mind and scrap that site.

Permit to replace the hardware:

https://permitsearch.mybuildingpermit.com/PermitDetails/BNR21-09062/Kirkland

Permit to upgrade the site:

https://permitsearch.mybuildingpermit.com/PermitDetails/WIR21-00584/Kirkland

 

Oh boy. Let me see if I can pull the azimuths. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, RAvirani said:

Oh boy. Let me see if I can pull the azimuths. 

I'm interested to see what you figure out. That area and the 85th St. Kirkland exit are getting absurd with tower density.

For others, came across the first Dish permit for the Woodinville area. Looks like they will colo on the AT&T tower.

 

https://aca-prod.accela.com/WOODINVILLE/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Building&TabName=Building&capID1=BLD21&capID2=00000&capID3=00611&agencyCode=WOODINVILLE&IsToShowInspection=

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

Looks like the National Glass site went live broadcasting 311-490 PLMN and some strange split eNBs: 505921, 506063 for 4G and 4198118 for 5G. I'll investigate it more tomorrow to verify.

Confirmed, B2/12/41/66/71 are on 505921 and B41 is on 506063. Have not seen this format of eNB in the Seattle area before. Usually when they split eNBs, it is because they have more than 3 sectors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/9/2021 at 8:28 AM, PedroDaGr8 said:

Confirmed, B2/12/41/66/71 are on 505921 and B41 is on 506063. Have not seen this format of eNB in the Seattle area before. Usually when they split eNBs, it is because they have more than 3 sectors.

Do you know what all is on the monopole behind target at alderwood? I’m here visiting and I don’t recall. I know T-Mobile is on the power pylon right by it. 

A49FF7D2-2B3B-461D-805F-27EA53BA2023.jpeg

AFE5B952-A992-457F-A8A9-E28838F54260.jpeg

F59ABAFC-3379-493A-8686-D327D2239CF3.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The top rack is a Sprint KMW 16=port antenna and a Samsung M-MIMO unit.  The bottom is an AT&T Firstnet setup.  The AT&T sector facing the mall has dual split-beam antennas for capacity. The microwave dishes at the bottom are from an abandoned Clearwire setup.  

T-Mobile is set to hop off of the SnoPUD transmission tower and onto the Sprint rack in the "nearish" future.  Dish will be joining in early 2022 as well.  Verizon is also colocating onto that site (I think this is forecasted past Q2 2022 though)...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/16/2021 at 4:52 PM, RAvirani said:

The top rack is a Sprint KMW 16=port antenna and a Samsung M-MIMO unit.  The bottom is an AT&T Firstnet setup.  The AT&T sector facing the mall has dual split-beam antennas for capacity. The microwave dishes at the bottom are from an abandoned Clearwire setup.  

T-Mobile is set to hop off of the SnoPUD transmission tower and onto the Sprint rack in the "nearish" future.  Dish will be joining in early 2022 as well.  Verizon is also colocating onto that site (I think this is forecasted past Q2 2022 though)...

That will be a LOADED site. 4 racks! Any plans you know of for it's (almost) sister site near the onramp at Poplar & 196th wrt the sprint rack?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/19/2021 at 9:41 PM, xmx1024 said:

That will be a LOADED site. 4 racks! Any plans you know of for it's (almost) sister site near the onramp at Poplar & 196th wrt the sprint rack?

If I remember correctly, that site is broadcasting a Sprint KeepPLMN as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And just noticed the Woodinville Warehouse District site just went live. Strangely, it is only broadcasting 5G with no 4G signals live yet (band select forces me on towers which are much farther away). I'm guessing those will go live later in the day.

 

Edit: and wow, I can connect to n41-SA despite my phone supposedly not supporting it (it doesn't show in the service menu)

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RAvirani said:

Looks like the Sprint site at 8th & 405 in downtown Bellevue has been converted. Huge coverage and capacity improvement. 

That's a lot of towers in a small area again (4th, 8th, and 12th) but here the capacity makes a bit more sense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

That's a lot of towers in a small area again (4th, 8th, and 12th) but here the capacity makes a bit more sense 

Lots of downtilt here - they’re doing a pretty good job of containing coverage to prevent sector overlap here. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/22/2021 at 9:22 AM, PedroDaGr8 said:

If I remember correctly, that site is broadcasting a Sprint KeepPLMN as well.

Wow, with existing enbs:
99506/84602
DAS (I think) 82539,
84547/881750
84598/97497

PLUS the site on NB i5 onramp near Lowe's and pending migration off the power pylon, alderwood mall area will be blanketed quite well. I wonder if they are investigating n41 only small cells? Must be quite a challenge to coordinate all these low band sites near eachother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/19/2021 at 9:41 PM, xmx1024 said:

Any plans you know of for it's (almost) sister site near the onramp at Poplar & 196th wrt the sprint rack?

Totally missed this. That site is forecasted to be converted Q2 2022.

7 hours ago, xmx1024 said:

Wow, with existing enbs:
99506/84602
DAS (I think) 82539,
84547/881750
84598/97497

PLUS the site on NB i5 onramp near Lowe's and pending migration off the power pylon, alderwood mall area will be blanketed quite well. I wonder if they are investigating n41 only small cells? Must be quite a challenge to coordinate all these low band sites near eachother.

And the site mentioned above.

https://imgur.com/a/5yNA0ny

I’m hoping they do a good job with the optimization here (unlike what we’re seeing in the Totem Lake area).

Lowband RET is separate from midband RET on the antennas they’re deploying, and its range is 2-13 degrees. They can use that and maybe even mechanical tilt to minimize sector overlap. 

No 2500 small cell plans that I’m aware of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, RAvirani said:

I’m hoping they do a good job with the optimization here (unlike what we’re seeing in the Totem Lake area).

 

Hah!

By the way, do you have any idea why the new Woodinville Warehouse tower is the ONLY tower I have encountered where I can connect to n41-SA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok either some glitch in my phone cleared or they activated n41-SA on a bunch of towers for about 10min. I was heading home for lunch, forgetting I had my phone locked on n41 and suddenly  I'm getting it everywhere. Places it never worked before (like home). Now it's back to not working.

Edit: And heading back towards Woodinville it started again but only for some towers. Very strange 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi! 

I have been closely watching the T-Mobile 5G buildout and gradual decommissioning of the Sprint network in the Seattle area. There are a few sites, though, that I cannot see permits on or have had outstanding permits for a very long time, and was curious regarding the conversion timeline to T-Mobile native. 

The main sites I have been avidly watching and waiting for are eNBs 746958 on Green Mountain, 747190 on Key Peninsula, and 745791. 

Edited by falconhand
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, falconhand said:

The main sites I have been avidly watching and waiting for are eNBs 746958 on Green Mountain, 747190 on Key Peninsula, and 745791. 

746958 and 747190 will both be converted. 745791 doesn’t appear to be slated for conversion…I’ll see if I can figure out why. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, RAvirani said:

746958 and 747190 will both be converted. 745791 doesn’t appear to be slated for conversion…I’ll see if I can figure out why. 

That's strange. 745791 is in a weak area for T-Mobile, and has been broadcasting 312-250 from the get go. (In fact, it was the site that I discovered the PLMN on in the first place). There's an outstanding permit (screenshot attached), but very limited public information. 

745791.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, falconhand said:

That's strange. 745791 is in a weak area for T-Mobile, and has been broadcasting 312-250 from the get go. (In fact, it was the site that I discovered the PLMN on in the first place). There's an outstanding permit (screenshot attached), but very limited public information. 

745791.PNG

Looks like my info was out of date - checked again this morning and that site is a listed as a conversion site.

Interestingly enough, they’re still showing a candidate at Lund & Bethell (47.51765, -122.63022), although it’s not added into the active program…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RAvirani said:

Looks like my info was out of date - checked again this morning and that site is a listed as a conversion site.

Interestingly enough, they’re still showing a candidate at Lund & Bethell (47.51765, -122.63022), although it’s not added into the active program…

Interesting. That's currently a Verizon site, and they just recently changed from a dual rack, quad panel Amphenol setup (two per rack), to dual NHH-65C-R3B on a single rack per sector. No c band installed. That could possibly be intended to make space for another colocation. I suppose T-Mobile may be considering both the sprint retain and a new colocation, though the only reason I could see for that would be densification with Home Internet in mind. 

 

Of course, the density they've been building out here with a combination of new builds, colocations, and Sprint retains is pretty astounding. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, falconhand said:

I suppose T-Mobile may be considering both the sprint retain and a new colocation, though the only reason I could see for that would be densification with Home Internet in mind. 

Let me pull the azimuths/tilts and take a look when I’m home this evening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/13/2021 at 1:27 PM, RAvirani said:

The original post is how I would set the network up if I were building it from scratch.  If I assume T-Mobile's sector alignments and remove the McDonald's site, this is what you would get.

PCS Coverage:

9aphlbN.png

PCS Sectors:

UqBvTpE.png

PCS SNR:

k5dYAsn.png

It's better, but not great.  Alternatively, if we remove the AT&T colo, we get...

PCS Coverage:

cdQDDur.png

PCS Sectors:

p8jxqZv.png

PCS SNR:

XNfVeCH.png

 

broken attachments :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, falconhand said:

I suppose T-Mobile may be considering both the sprint retain and a new colocation, though the only reason I could see for that would be densification with Home Internet in mind. 

4 hours ago, RAvirani said:

Let me pull the azimuths/tilts and take a look when I’m home this evening.

Unlikely:

https://imgur.com/a/bWKGcPB

I don’t have a T-Mobile traffic map to run a Monte-Carlo simulation or anything, but I doubt there’s a capacity need in that area.

  • Love 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...