Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Inside HEB at Westheimer and Fountainview near the Galleria:

 

post-5467-13546718761901_thumb.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPad/iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I will be traveling to Houston next weekend and I am wondering what the signals and LTE performance is like at IAH- Houston Intercontinental all the way down into the heart of Downtown? How is the signal doing going through skyscrapers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Around IAH the signal is pretty good there are still towers that need LTE upgrades but overall good coverage. Coverage on the way downtown there are areas where there is no LTE currently. I haven't really been in the downtown area other than passing through. When passing through coverage seems about the same as the previous mentioned areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there are still towers that need LTE upgrades

 

By this, do you mean that the sites that are already equipped and online with NV/LTE are performing poorly?

 

Or are you saying that there are sites near IAH which are not equipped with NV/LTE equipment yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

By this' date=' do you mean that the sites that are already equipped and online with NV/LTE are performing poorly?

 

Or are you saying that there are sites near IAH which are not equipped with NV/LTE equipment yet?[/quote']

 

Most of the upgrades in Houston have been 4g only. This being said if you aren't on 4g you will more than likely be on legacy 3g. As of tonight I still dropped back to 3g when in the area of IAH but this was momentarily. The equipment that has been changed out in most of north Houston seems to be functioning fine most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I will be traveling to Houston next weekend and I am wondering what the signals and LTE performance is like at IAH- Houston Intercontinental all the way down into the heart of Downtown? How is the signal doing going through skyscrapers?

 

Buildings are hit or miss. I've been in the medical center and had LTE even in elevators, while in other buildings it dropped to 3G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

AFAIK the Waco and Wichita Falls markets are the only parts of TX with 800 CDMA enabled.

 

Yes after IDEN is sunset, they will start enabling 800 CDMA and later in the year 800 LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Im wondering if Sprint needs to have there fiber connection sped up because in the morning i get around 8-15 mbps and around the day it drops to what i call 3G speeds and it ends up to be around .50-3 mbps. It's hard to facetime over this connection because sometimes the ping is around 100-300. And for the people that are going to tell me use wifi, i cant because all they offer in my area is ATT uverse and that is even barely usuable for web browsing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im wondering if Sprint needs to have there fiber connection sped up because in the morning i get around 8-15 mbps and around the day it drops to what i call 3G speeds and it ends up to be around .50-3 mbps. It's hard to facetime over this connection because sometimes the ping is around 100-300. And for the people that are going to tell me use wifi, i cant because all they offer in my area is ATT uverse and that is even barely usuable for web browsing. 

Sounds like they haven't turned on all the sites in your area yet. As they turn on more sites it should spread the load out more and reduce the load on any one site. Hopefully that is the case and you will start seeing some improvement soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im wondering if Sprint needs to have there fiber connection sped up because in the morning i get around 8-15 mbps and around the day it drops to what i call 3G speeds and it ends up to be around .50-3 mbps. It's hard to facetime over this connection because sometimes the ping is around 100-300. And for the people that are going to tell me use wifi, i cant because all they offer in my area is ATT uverse and that is even barely usuable for web browsing. 

 

You need to become a sponsor to see the proportion of sites in your area that has already gone live with LTE and the proportion that has yet to go live with LTE.  Otherwise, you are judging capacity based on incomplete information, probably incomplete deployment, too.

 

Additionally, yes, you need to be offloading to Wi-Fi at home.  If not, you are part of the problem, and people like you are just making the problem worse for yourselves, as Sprint LTE is not a home broadband replacement.  What you say is flat out false:  AT&T U-verse, even AT&T DSL, is more than adequate for web browsing.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Uverse isn't adequate for web browsing in my area because its always going in and out and I have gotten a new modem, it's the same thing and the sad part is I have a 6 Mbps down plan and my 3G is faster and more reliable then my uverse. But I do offload to wifi when it's working.

 

Anyways does anyone know when 800 SMR will be deployed in Houston?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uverse isn't adequate for web browsing in my area because its always going in and out and I have gotten a new modem, it's the same thing and the sad part is I have a 6 Mbps down plan and my 3G is faster and more reliable then my uverse. But I do offload to wifi when it's working.

 

Anyways does anyone know when 800 SMR will be deployed in Houston?

Try connecting to it via ethernet cable for a few days. We are seeing more and more that the 2.4GHz spectrum is so noisy that a lot of equipment is experiencing poor performance, which is typically just described as "spotty Internet" and blamed on AT&T or Comcast or whoever (though they do suck in their own right).

 

I'd say 95% of cases of intermittent intolerable slowdowns on home internet I see are due to something related to the 2.4GHz link. 99% in the case of a unshared link like UVerse or DSL. Often proper configuration can fix it. Even more often, 5.8GHz wifi. Almost always, Ethernet.

 

I use low power routers with custom firmware and tuned to the spectral landscape of my area so I don't add to the problem, and a high-gain directional antenna. But I'm an RF supergeek.

 

Seriously. 2.4GHz is really fubar in most places now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Sprint says that Houston LTE will be complete by November which is approaching quickly. I hope that they will wait until November to actually activate LTE and have not activated it yet because for now I seem to only get LTE in a few places around town. Hopefully what I'm picking up every now and then is just a test and not where they've already turned LTE on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint says that Houston LTE will be complete by November which is approaching quickly. I hope that they will wait until November to actually activate LTE and have not activated it yet because for now I seem to only get LTE in a few places around town. Hopefully what I'm picking up every now and then is just a test and not where they've already turned LTE on.

 

What part of town are you in?  A good portion of the city has LTE now.  If you become a subscriber of this site, you get access to maps that show where 4G is accepted.  I also keep up with a map (see sig).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What part of town are you in?  A good portion of the city has LTE now.  If you become a subscriber of this site, you get access to maps that show where 4G is accepted.  I also keep up with a map (see sig).

I'm in Humble/Atascocita. Right at Atascocita Rd and Will Clayton to be exact. My concern is that part of my neighborhood has LTE service and even a good section of Will Clayton Parkway as well until you get to the entrance of my subdivision. I hope that it hasn't been fully activated in this area because that may mean that we won't get a good LTE signal at home or am I thinking about it all wrong? Thanks for the tip I'll check it out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in Humble/Atascocita. Right at Atascocita Rd and Will Clayton to be exact. My concern is that part of my neighborhood has LTE service and even a good section of Will Clayton Parkway as well until you get to the entrance of my subdivision. I hope that it hasn't been fully activated in this area because that may mean that we won't get a good LTE signal at home or am I thinking about it all wrong? Thanks for the tip I'll check it out!

 

It's got a ways to go there, so it can get better for you.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that there is finally LTE in Pearland on FM 518 and 288. That area has been absolutely brutal with getting any data coverage whatsoever (not even talking LTE, just 3G). I drove through a few days ago and noticed my 4G indicator was on and data was super quick. Seems like Sprint finally flipped the switch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's got a ways to go there, so it can get better for you.

 

Oh so it's not done yet? That's good to hear. I'm not worried about waiting because I have Wifi I just want to make sure that LTE hasn't skipped over my area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So i took a late night trip on BW8; I turned on RootMetrics Continuous Testing to get an updated comparison of the two networks.

 

Just out of curiosity, does anyone know the carrier config of the two in Houston? 5x5, 10x10

 

SPRINT:    HTC Evo 4G LTE 

                 Stock ROM rev 3.16.651.3 (Andrioid 4.1.1; PRI 2.24_003; PRL 25016)

VERIZON:  HTC Thunderbolt 

                  Unofficial JB update rev 7.00.605.2 710RD (Andriod 4.0.3; PRI 1.41_002 & 1.64_002; PRL 15256)

 

Route:       W Sam Houston Pkwy S @ Blackhawk to N Sam Houston Pkwy W @ Briar Forest @ 0120hrs

 

 

10795119544_2d0f72ff1c.jpg    10795231223_2defec41e0.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So i took a late night trip on BW8; I turned on RootMetrics Continuous Testing to get an updated comparison of the two networks.

 

Just out of curiosity, does anyone know the carrier config of the two in Houston? 5x5, 10x10

 

For your Sprint and VZW handsets, Sprint has 5 MHz FDD in band 25 LTE 1900, while VZW has 10 MHz FDD in band 13 LTE 750.  Sprint and VZW both are deploying in other bands, too, but your equipment does not support those bands.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I have just noticed that the towers in my area reflect 3G/4G on the upgrade maps.  Based on that information it would seem that my area is done with at least the 1900 part.  I have checked around my house on the engineering screen of my iPhone 5 and it has a signal strength of -114 which I don't believe is too great.  I am getting download speeds of 900k and 60k up pretty consistently.  I am roughly 2 miles from the nearest towers (across flat land as in my area the only hills that we have are overpasses).  Am I safe to assume that (barring any device changes) that this is as good as it it going to get based on my proximity to the tower?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I safe to assume that (barring any device changes) that this is as good as it it going to get based on my proximity to the tower?

 

Inside your house on PCS 1900 MHz?  Yes.  Like all other providers, Sprint does not guarantee any level of in building coverage.

 

Now, where are you located?  This discussion belongs in a market thread, not its own standalone thread.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually it is outside of my house on the patio as well that I am seeing this.  I am in the Houston area.

 

A few thoughts...

 

In a metro area, two miles to the nearest site(s) is a bit of a stretch.  One mile is a more typical maximum before handoff to the next site.  Additionally, if roughly two miles equidistant from multiple sites, that is even worse because of co channel interference.

 

However, you are posting from a Comcast IP address, so you have wired broadband.  LTE at home should be the least of your concerns, as you should be on your own Wi-Fi for data.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • More details/pics: https://www.si.com/nfl/saints/news/saints-fans-to-enjoy-new-nfl-experience-with-massive-wireless-tech-upgrade-at-caesars-superdome-01j5yb9yd5xr https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240822812168/en/MatSing-Lens-Antennas-Enhance-Connectivity-at-Caesars-Superdome-Ahead-of-New-Orleans-Saints-Season https://www.nola.com/news/business/itll-be-easier-to-call-text-inside-superdome-thanks-to-80m-wireless-upgrade-what-to/article_bf2dd66c-4f85-11ef-9820-b3c36c831099.html
    • T-Mobile Fires Back At AT&T After Their Statements On T-Priority
    • February is always closer than you think! https://stadiumtechreport.com/news/caesars-superdome-gets-matsing-deployment-ahead-of-super-bowl-lix/ Another Super Bowl, another MatSing cellular antenna deployment. Caesars Superdome, home of the NFL’s New Orleans Saints, has deployed a large number of cellular antennas from MatSing as part of an effort to increase wireless network capacity ahead of the upcoming Super Bowl LIX in February, 2025. It is the third such deployment of MatSing equipment at Super Bowl venues in as many years, following cellular upgrades at Allegiant Stadium for Super Bowl LVIII and at State Farm Stadium for Super Bowl LVII. According to the Saints, the MatSing antennas were part of a large wireless overhaul this offseason, done primarily “to satisfy fans’ desires for wireless consumption and bandwidth,” an important thing with Super Bowl LIX coming to the venue on Feb. 9, 2025. Each year, the NFL’s big game regularly sets records for wireless data consumption, with a steady upward progression ever since wireless networks were first put into stadiums. https://www.neworleanssaints.com/news/caesars-superdome-transformation-2024-new-orleans-saints-nfl-season-part-1-wifi-upgrades-wireless-cellular During the offseason renovation project, the foundation of the facility's new Distributed Antenna System (DAS) was the installation of 16 multi-beam, wideband spherical lense antennas that are seven feet in diameter and weigh nearly 600 pounds apiece, a model called the MatSing MS-48H180. Another 16 large antenna spheres of varying sizes and frequencies have also been installed for a total of 32 new large antennas, in addition to 200 cellular antennas inside and around the building, all of these products specifically made for high-density environments such as stadiums and arenas. The DAS system's performance is expected to enhance further as it becomes fully integrated throughout the season. The MatSing MS-48H180 devices, with a black color that matches the Caesars Superdome's roof, each were individually raised by hoist machines to the top of the facility and bolted into place. Each cellular antenna then transmits 48 different beams and signals to a specific area in the stadium, with each sphere angled differently to specifically target different coverage areas, allowing increased, consistent coverage for high-density seating areas. In addition to creating targets in seating and common areas throughout the stadium, these antennas create dedicated floor zones that result in improved coverage to the field areas for fans in 12 field-level suites and the Mercedes-Benz End Zone Club, teams and on-field media and broadcast elements. The project is also adding 2,500 new wireless access points placed in areas such as concourses, atriums, suites and food and beverage areas for better WiFi coverage.
    • https://www.yahoo.com/news/dallas-county-completes-first-911-194128506.html - First 911 call/text received over Starlink/T-Mobile direct to cell.  This appears to be in Dallas County, MO.
    • FCC: "We remain committed to helping with recovery efforts in states affected by Hurricane Helene. We stand ready to do all that is necessary to return connectivity to hard-hit areas and save lives." SpaceX: "SpaceX and @TMobile have been given emergency special temporary authority by the @FCC to enable @Starlink satellites with direct-to-cell capability to provide coverage for cell phones in the affected areas of Hurricane Helene. The satellites have already been enabled and started broadcasting emergency alerts to cell phones on all networks in North Carolina. In addition, we may test basic texting (SMS) capabilities for most cell phones on the T-Mobile network in North Carolina. SpaceX’s direct-to-cell constellation has not been fully deployed, so all services will be delivered on a best-effort basis." Space posted this at 2pm today on X.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...