Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Can sprint do 2xca or 10x10mhz in Houston on band 25?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Post on previous page makes me believe no, it can't do either.  They only have the G Block 5x5, 5 MHz D and  5 MHz E block.  As long as cdma is active they can't do much with their PCS there, but Houston seems to be getting quite a few small cells.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Post on previous page makes me believe no, it can't do either. They only have the G Block 5x5, 5 MHz D and 5 MHz E block. As long as cdma is active they can't do much with their PCS there, but Houston seems to be getting quite a few small cells.

Nice ! Asking for a buddy of mine. He says drop to b25&26 are still happening more frequent

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice ! Asking for a buddy of mine. He says drop to b25&26 are still happening more frequent

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Poorly spaced market + dense trees (Oaks, pines pecan, etc) make B41 pretty hard to get, even for small cells. The range is very limited unless you have a clean line of sight. This leads to overloaded B25/26 since B41 acts like an outdoor network only for the most part.

 

As said earlier, Sprint only has 30 MHz of PCS+G spectrum. The original 20 MHz isn't paired and it's being used for 3G services (one 1xRTT + three Evdo) while the 10 MHz in the g block make the lone PCS LTE carrier (5x5). There is very little chance the other carriers swap spectrum since everyone else already has their spectrum paired (except At&t, but I doubt they care to add their last 10 MHz to their already contiguous 40 MHz). Verizon also has terrible spacing issues, but it's not as bad as Sprint and they make up for it by splitting cells. It seems everyone but Sprint is doing that down there.

 

800 MHz LTE is congested for Sprint. Forget about even browsing during peak hours on B26. On the bright side, 1x800 has made Sprint the most reliable carrier when it comes to voice.

 

 

 

TLDR; This ain't El Paso. We got trees blocking B41, thus making B25/26 congested.

 

 

 

I enjoy the videos you make btw. Ever thought about making a video about wireless in Juarez?

Edited by greenbastard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Post on previous page makes me believe no, it can't do either.  They only have the G Block 5x5, 5 MHz D and  5 MHz E block.  As long as cdma is active they can't do much with their PCS there, but Houston seems to be getting quite a few small cells.

 

Do you happen to know where some of these small cells are located so far?  I have found tons of small cells but they usually end up being the zayo tmo small cells.  I found a couple sprint small cells but thats it.. about 2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Good news for those of you in Houston. Sprint has finally thinned out 3G on the PCS band. They have shut off EVDO channels 725 and 775 in favor of a second LTE carrier (1965-1970 MHz). They've also done some optimization where LTE is now going in deeper into buildings and holding on even longer (looks like they lowered the qrxlevmin).

 

I'm disappointed it took them over a year and a half after San Antonio did this. But impressed nonetheless. I guess Calling+ is about to see a massive push.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good news for those of you in Houston. Sprint has finally thinned out 3G on the PCS band. They have shut off EVDO channels 725 and 775 in favor of a second LTE carrier (1965-1970 MHz). They've also done some optimization where LTE is now going in deeper into buildings and holding on even longer (looks like they lowered the qrxlevmin).

 

I'm disappointed it took them over a year and a half after San Antonio did this. But impressed nonetheless. I guess Calling+ is about to see a massive push.

 

I noticed that earlier this week in the parking garage at my office. I didn't know if it was something new or just an error with the signal check pro app.  I'm near the Galleria off of 59/Southwest Freeway and New Castle.

 

I get a solid B41 signal in my office so this isn't important to me here but it'll be nice around town when not on B41.

 

wnOVYbRl.jpg

 

 

Kbad342l.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed that earlier this week in the parking garage at my office. I didn't know if it was something new or just an error with the signal check pro app. I'm near the Galleria off of 59/Southwest Freeway and New Castle.

 

I get a solid B41 signal in my office so this isn't important to me here but it'll be nice around town when not on B41.

 

 

I first noticed it Tuesday. I'm assuming Sprint was undergoing testing way before then since the EVDO channels in that block weren't accessible this past weekend. I should have checked with Network Signal Guru, but I felt too lazy to root.

 

I wonder what other markets also saw spectrum reallocation? The new PRL that came out recently probably reflected the removal of those channels. I guess anytime we see a new PRL, it can also mean Sprint is reallocating spectrum and launching new LTE carriers.

 

Kind of weird timing too with the hurricane brewing in the gulf. I hope two voice carriers are enough to handle the demand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good news for those of you in Houston. Sprint has finally thinned out 3G on the PCS band. They have shut off EVDO channels 725 and 775 in favor of a second LTE carrier (1965-1970 MHz). They've also done some optimization where LTE is now going in deeper into buildings and holding on even longer (looks like they lowered the qrxlevmin).

 

I'm disappointed it took them over a year and a half after San Antonio did this. But impressed nonetheless. I guess Calling+ is about to see a massive push.

 

This is such great news!! thanks for sharing.  Unfortunately I damaged my htc 10 sunday and im waiting for the replacement one to come in... :( so i dont get to take advantage of this change.  Hopefully it will be in today!! if not... with the storming coming in i doubt i will get it until like wednesday. 

 

Quick question.  Were they able to do this because of the swap with ATT?

 

Thanks again!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is such great news!! thanks for sharing. Unfortunately I damaged my htc 10 sunday and im waiting for the replacement one to come in... :( so i dont get to take advantage of this change. Hopefully it will be in today!! if not... with the storming coming in i doubt i will get it until like wednesday.

 

Quick question. Were they able to do this because of the swap with ATT?

 

Thanks again!!

I haven't checked to see if At&t had a spectrum swap with Sprint lately. I believe the last time At&t swapped spectrum in Houston was with Verizon were they lost spectrum in Houston and gained somewhere else (iirc...memory is foggy). At&t, for the time being, is set. They have one wide 20x20 LTE carrier in the PCS band that unfortunately sits right smack in the middle of Sprint's G block and E block. Not much incentive for them to move.

 

But if Sprint/At&t did swap spectrum on paper, then it hasn't happened in the field. The center DL for EVDO channels 725 and 775 were 1966.25 mhz and 1968.75 mhz, respectively. The center DL for the new LTE carrier is 1967.5 mhz

 

This was just good old fashioned spectrum repurposing. The E block to be exact.

Edited by greenbastard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Does anyone know if Sprint changed the LTE TDD configuration to configuration 2? I decided to run a speedtest in my office and got 14Mb/s down 2 Mb/s up, where it used to be about 9Mb/s down and 4.5Mb/s up. I'm using a Moto G4 Plus which does NOT have carrier aggregation btw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, avb said:

Does anyone know if Sprint changed the LTE TDD configuration to configuration 2? I decided to run a speedtest in my office and got 14Mb/s down 2 Mb/s up, where it used to be about 9Mb/s down and 4.5Mb/s up. I'm using a Moto G4 Plus which does NOT have carrier aggregation btw.

Yes they did. The Moto G4 plus should have 2xca.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, avb said:

Does anyone know if Sprint changed the LTE TDD configuration to configuration 2? I decided to run a speedtest in my office and got 14Mb/s down 2 Mb/s up, where it used to be about 9Mb/s down and 4.5Mb/s up. I'm using a Moto G4 Plus which does NOT have carrier aggregation btw.

Yep. Many Nokia / Ericsson and Samsung markets run Config 2 now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, lilotimz said:

Yep. Many Nokia / Ericsson and Samsung markets run Config 2 now.

Could someone explain to me what config 2 means or point me in the right direction to a thread to read up on it please?  Thank you! 

Not sure if it is related but yesterday late afternoon through the evening I had very unreliable data on b41 most of the time not working at all.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, deankelem said:

Could someone explain to me what config 2 means or point me in the right direction to a thread to read up on it please?  Thank you! 

Not sure if it is related but yesterday late afternoon through the evening I had very unreliable data on b41 most of the time not working at all.  

It is a change in the download to upload timeslot ratio on B41. Config 2 changes max speeds on B41 to 112.5 mbps down and 8.8 mbps up. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, RAvirani said:

It is a change in the download to upload timeslot ratio on B41. Config 2 changes max speeds on B41 to 108 mbps down and 9 mbps up. 

112.5 / 8.8

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RAvirani said:

It is a change in the download to upload timeslot ratio on B41. Config 2 changes max speeds on B41 to 108 mbps down and 9 mbps up. 

 

21 minutes ago, lilotimz said:

112.5 / 8.8

 

Great! thank you both.  I knew Sprint adjusted their timing to cater more towards download speeds in some areas, I did not know what the config 1 and 2 meant.  I appreciate it.  I am assuming that those new down/up speeds are while 2xCA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, deankelem said:

 

 

Great! thank you both.  I knew Sprint adjusted their timing to cater more towards download speeds in some areas, I did not know what the config 1 and 2 meant.  I appreciate it.  I am assuming that those new down/up speeds are while 2xCA?

Single 20 MHz carrier, 2x2 MIMO, 64 QAM. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure I like the upload speeds on configuration 2 so much. On Clearwire towers, before the configuration change, it wasn't uncommon to see 10Mb/s download speeds with 300-500Kb/s uploads. Now those uploads are around 100Kb/s.

Is carrier aggregation coming for uploads?  If so are any current phones able to take advantage of that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No specific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...