Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

On 1/15/2018 at 9:44 PM, Grabber5.0 said:

Wow, that's the fastest I've seen down yet. I know I've gotten over 100 on this 5X, but nothing close to 190!

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
 

Indeed - I have seen 120's on my local home tower on b41, but I have never seen over that.  I nearly crapped my pants when i saw it in the 190's!  :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/17/2018 at 9:45 AM, shaferz said:

Indeed - I have seen 120's on my local home tower on b41, but I have never seen over that.  I nearly crapped my pants when i saw it in the 190's!  :o

The bottom 3 results were also at O'Hare H Concourse, on Thursday morning. Very impressive, especially since they were on my aging GS7. 

(The top 3 were in Las Vegas, but that's another story for another thread.) 

Screenshot_20180120-070657.png

Edited by tommym65
Correction
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's so strange how differently the rsrq and rsrp are calculated. I have never seen, at least on the Android phones I have owned an rsrp less than -128db. If it's that low usually my phone gives up and switches to evdo.


Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, tongboy said:

It's so strange how differently the rsrq and rsrp are calculated. I have never seen, at least on the Android phones I have owned an rsrp less than -128db. If it's that low usually my phone gives up and switches to evdo.


Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 

That’s bad data.  The iPhone’s field test app is not generally reliable or accurate. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, RAvirani said:

That’s bad data.  The iPhone’s field test app is not generally reliable or accurate. 

It’s a shame they didn’t develop the field test app more. Hopefully the Intel version is better in the future! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
8 hours ago, mhammett said:

https://www.cellmapper.net/testmap/map/310/120/LTE?lat=41.954192385285396&lng=-88.73004913330078&z=15

 

Any thoughts on site 517309? There is a tower there with multiple carriers, but it's not a legacy site and doesn't appear to be an active Sprint site any longer.

Not sure what you're asking. That site still has a valid Sprint ID.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dkoellerwx said:

Not sure what you're asking. That site still has a valid Sprint ID.

I misread the site. I thought it said that the last seen was in 2016, therefore assuming it was offline. It has the last seen in December, so likely I just haven't had CellMapper on when driving past there since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I drove by today and it was there. I didn't visually confirm the equipment on the tower, but all indications are that's where it is. There's a small cell EARFCN in the vicinity and I haven't figured out where that was. It could be at the Sprint store that's near there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mr.Nuke said:

Wow, those are unattractive. Do other parts of Chicago have rules about how these are supposed to look that go beyond "make it the same color as the pole it's on"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mr.Nuke said:

Thanks for the pics! Sprint’s small cell is the black antenna piece sticking out of the top of the light pole, correct?

I’ve been seeing more of the cantenna’s similar to the one a bit lower on the pole, near me. Do you know whom those belong to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, WuTang03 said:

Thanks for the pics! Sprint’s small cell is the black antenna piece sticking out of the top of the light pole, correct?

I’ve been seeing more of the cantenna’s similar to the one a bit lower on the pole, near me. Do you know whom those belong to?

All of it is Sprint..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, WuTang03 said:


Thanks for all the help :)

This is one that I have seen recently as well. I don’t think it’s Sprint, though. Verizon? 423a286c48d3e7a9de0a3bf60f34ff8b.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nope.

Take a look here to get a better look at what Sprint Airharmony small cells look like...

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nexgencpu said:

Nope.

Take a look here to get a better look at what Sprint Airharmony small cells look like...

 

 

Appreciate it! Looks like I’ve been driving by it and not even noticing ?‍♂️ I’ll be on the lookout for more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, WuTang03 said:


Thanks for all the help :)

This is one that I have seen recently as well. I don’t think it’s Sprint, though. Verizon?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, that is likely a Verizon or AT&T small cell. The Sprint ones use a skinnier antenna at top, along with a relay antenna lower down the pole like in the images that Mr Nuke linked to. All of the equipment that was attached to those light poles is part of the Sprint small cell. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the help [emoji4]

 

This is one that I have seen recently as well. I don’t think it’s Sprint, though. Verizon? 423a286c48d3e7a9de0a3bf60f34ff8b.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

That's a Verizon node setup for B2/4/5/13. T-Mobile often goes on those same poles with Verizon using Nokia Flexi Zones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2018 at 12:44 AM, gusherb said:

 

That's a Verizon node setup for B2/4/5/13. T-Mobile often goes on those same poles with Verizon using Nokia Flexi Zones.

Thanks for the help! I'll be on the lookout for new Sprint small cells around town :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...