Jump to content

Recommended Posts

 

Do you happen to know if Crown Castle owns the site, or the City of Los Angeles?  There was a vault for the site that was marked "Crown Castle".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you happen to know if Crown Castle owns the site, or the City of Los Angeles?  There was a vault for the site that was marked "Crown Castle".

Not sure, but I think that they are city owned. I have observed (as seen in the photo) that many street light poles around the areas surrounding these sites have small receivers installed. The city replaced the old high pressure sodium street lights with LED fixtures over the past few years, and wants to be able to remotely dim and brighten the lights at will using wireless technology...perhaps that is what these sites are for, as well as leasing to wireless providers eventually for extra revenue.

light pole.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure, but I think that they are city owned. I have observed (as seen in the photo) that many street light poles around the areas surrounding these sites have small receivers installed. The city replaced the old high pressure sodium street lights with LED fixtures over the past few years, and wants to be able to remotely dim and brighten the lights at will using wireless technology...perhaps that is what these sites are for, as well as leasing to wireless providers eventually for extra revenue.

 

 

In my opinion the new installations would be gross overkill for the street light controllers.  But that's my opinion and it's not close to even being worth 2 cents.

 

On a related note, it's kind of sad to see the old series wired street lights go away.  A lot of that was circa 1940s infrastructure.  Obviously the LEDs are superior in almost every way, but it was like a living museum of electrical history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1x800 in Hawaiian Gardens! As close as I have seen to SBC so far. Might just be testing because it keeps going back and forth to 1xRTT.

Edited by Samappz
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure, but I think that they are city owned. I have observed (as seen in the photo) that many street light poles around the areas surrounding these sites have small receivers installed. The city replaced the old high pressure sodium street lights with LED fixtures over the past few years, and wants to be able to remotely dim and brighten the lights at will using wireless technology...perhaps that is what these sites are for, as well as leasing to wireless providers eventually for extra revenue.

 

That looks like one of the old and never removed modems from Richocet, a system that was shut down long time ago. I used it in OC and it was wireless surfing at 128Kbps!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I was in LA yesterday and I noticed that my iPhone 6s dropped a lot of times into 3G even within LTE areas that should have great coverage. I saw this as well at LAX (Terminal 3) where I was stuck on 1x for some time. LA needs more sites and B26 ugently.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in LA yesterday and I noticed that my iPhone 6s dropped a lot of times into 3G even within LTE areas that should have great coverage. I saw this as well at LAX (Terminal 3) where I was stuck on 1x for some time. LA needs more sites and B26 ugently.

 

 

I haven't been in the North terminals for a while, but T5 & T6 coverage and speed have been good for me.

 

When I had my HTC M8 it would automatically connect to the Boingo Wi-Fi in the airport, but I don't think that's happened with my 6s.  Maybe that would go a long way toward solving connectivity in T3.

 

You're right, SoCal in general needs greater site density and B26.  NYC for example or Atlanta offer a much better experience.

 

That said, there is progress being made in this market.  There have been a lot of 3G sites in the canyons that have been converted to LTE.  Many of these sites aren't even sites listed on the NV map.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same down in San Diego. It would be nice to see B26. San Diego market has been quiet which means LA market gotten all the resources. This is from past experience and usually San Diego gets its resources when LA market slows down.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't been in the North terminals for a while, but T5 & T6 coverage and speed have been good for me.

 

When I had my HTC M8 it would automatically connect to the Boingo Wi-Fi in the airport, but I don't think that's happened with my 6s.  Maybe that would go a long way toward solving connectivity in T3.

 

You're right, SoCal in general needs greater site density and B26.  NYC for example or Atlanta offer a much better experience.

 

That said, there is progress being made in this market.  There have been a lot of 3G sites in the canyons that have been converted to LTE.  Many of these sites aren't even sites listed on the NV map.

 

 

I noticed some large antennas on the parking lot across the street from the terminal, but wasn't able to see who runs them. In terms of WiFi, I don't like to use public networks for security reasons.

I'm surprised that Sprint has not been more aggressive to convert former WiMax sites to full CDMA/LTE sites.

 

The 3G sites where in the middle of the city like around the LATTC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in LA yesterday and I noticed that my iPhone 6s dropped a lot of times into 3G even within LTE areas that should have great coverage. I saw this as well at LAX (Terminal 3) where I was stuck on 1x for some time. LA needs more sites and B26 ugently.

It's why I had to leave them, same thing in the South Bay (San Jose). I just don't understand it. LA really just needs more sites, I don't think B26 will fix the problems, it will just end up overloaded.

 

PS. This isn't a bashing post, I want Sprint to be awesome because their plans offer good value and good competition is awesome. I just don't get how it's still so bad. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some fastback action in LA

rYto38C.jpg

 

Do you happen to know if Crown Castle owns the site, or the City of Los Angeles?  There was a vault for the site that was marked "Crown Castle".

 

Owned by the city and long termed lease by Crown Castle who in turn leases it out to generally Verizon at the moment.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint service on the Metro Red and Purple lines is coming in 2-3 months. Verizon service just launched.

 

https://www.metro.net/news/simple_pr/cell-service-now-available-verizon-customers-metro/

 

The (mostly) peace and quiet I enjoy on the subway will soon be coming to an end...  :(

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Owned by the city and long termed lease by Crown Castle who in turn leases it out to generally Verizon at the moment.

I have a request in with the City for a list of the SmartPole site locations, so it will be interesting to see if any of them would be useful to Sprint, or if they were solely placed with Verizon in mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's why I had to leave them, same thing in the South Bay (San Jose). I just don't understand it. LA really just needs more sites, I don't think B26 will fix the problems, it will just end up overloaded.

 

PS. This isn't a bashing post, I want Sprint to be awesome because their plans offer good value and good competition is awesome. I just don't get how it's still so bad.

 

Band 26 will actually solve most of the coverage gaps as it does travel further in distance. Yes it will be overloaded but that's why they're rolling out small cells to densify it. They'll be fine when band 26 is cleared for rollout

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The (mostly) peace and quiet I enjoy on the subway will soon be coming to an end...  :(

 

 

It's definitely not as bad as you think. In NYC there is currently a project to bring cellular service to our 400+ stations which have been service-less since its inception in the mid-late 19th Century. People don't really take advantage of the new service unless they're just trying to make a quick call while waiting for the train. Pretty much everyone understands how awkward it is to have a phone conversation on the train.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's definitely not as bad as you think. In NYC there is currently a project to bring cellular service to our 400+ stations which have been service-less since its inception in the mid-late 19th Century. People don't really take advantage of the new service unless they're just trying to make a quick call while waiting for the train. Pretty much everyone understands how awkward it is to have a phone conversation on the train.

 

I wish I could say that Angelinos could possibly have this kind of respect for their fellow riders, but that is sadly not the case. Tons of people have no problem making loud calls on the light-rail trains that run above ground (and thus have cell service). The only thing that stops them is when those trains occasionally have to go through an underground tunnel. Maybe that attitude will change since underground cell service is a comparatively precious commodity, but I'm skeptical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might not look like it, but all of these sites have LTE. Sponsors can get the details in the "Report Sites in Progress" thread.

 

QUpxs3Nm.jpg

5k4VOILm.jpg

obkFLJdm.jpg

rBiqufqm.jpg

maOFkfTm.jpg

 

 

Are these small cells in LA ? Exact location ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are these small cells in LA ? Exact location ?

 

 

I posted the exact locations in the thread below, but you have to be a sponsor to get access:

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/3369-report-in-progress-sites-here/?p=477729

 

Generally, you can find these type of sites in the hilly terrain surrounding the city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted the exact locations in the thread below, but you have to be a sponsor to get access:

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/3369-report-in-progress-sites-here/?p=477729

 

Generally, you can find these type of sites in the hilly terrain surrounding the city.

Nice work! There are 5 of these type of sites on Carbon Canyon Road, I'll be checking up on them this weekend for any progress. The site near Carbon Canyon Regional Park in Brea is B25 and B41 active now since the last map update.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...