Jump to content

Softbank - New Sprint - Discussion


linhpham2

Recommended Posts

Maybe T-Mobile is extremely smart, negotiate another awesome breakup fee and collect another billion in cash to build out their new A block spectrum once the merger faces too many regulatory hurdles to clear.

Not going to happen. Sprint can't afford to give a competitor an advantage like that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, you are nuts.  VZN would love the deal because they would target PCS and/or AWS.

 

Son is going to make an offer for T-Mobile purely for the subs and marketing.

 

I am sure Son sees the potential of Sprint+T-Mobile to offer the scale needed to take on VZN/AT&T and prevent a price war blowing up between S/TMUS - Win-Win for Son.

 

I don't think this is good for consumers because we'll be basically left with two choices - AT&T/VZN or Sprint.  Sprint will always be priced JUST below AT&T/VZN (which are priced right on top of each other).

 

That will become the status quo and the recent spat of price wars, plan innovations, etc will abruptly end.  So, VZN and AT&T will continue their 40+% margins and Sprint will be happy in 3rd place at 35% margins.

 

Bottom line, a merger would be a huge lose for consumers which makes me really wonder what they'll have to do to get the DOJ to approve it.

 

Maybe T-Mobile is extremely smart, negotiate another awesome breakup fee and collect another billion in cash to build out their new A block spectrum once the merger faces too many regulatory hurdles to clear.

 

I'm sure T-Mo's existing plan has NO future and will only increase the debt load. At the end of the day, they are targeting customers who are traditionally fickle and will jump ship if they don't get what is promised. In the sense of the urban customer base, that's what Boost Mobile is for. What's their strategy for years 2-5?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not going to happen. Sprint can't afford to give a competitor an advantage like that.

 

For Son - it's a risk/reward scenario.  I suspect that they'll be confident they can get the deal done before moving forward - likely with some significant spectrum divests and other accommodations to the DOJ (similar to how US AIR and AA just gave away a bunch of gates at Dulles and LGA).

 

I'm sure T-Mo's existing plan has NO future and will only increase the debt load. At the end of the day, they are targeting customers who are traditionally fickle and will jump ship if they don't get what is promised. In the sense of the urban customer base, that's what Boost Mobile is for. What's their strategy for years 2-5?

 

Deval - what you are saying goes against what reality is.

 

Churn and margins are improving, not decreasing.  They're becoming a more valuable carrier with the actions they've taken.  This is likely causing Son to be ticked off, as it is jacking up the acquisition cost of T-Mobile.  Deutsche Telekom was just bragging about how T-Mobile is back to the level at which AT&T tried to acquire them.

 

Given the current market, I suspect Son is trying to move quickly in a rising rate environment combined with a company that is growing its enterprise value rather quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not going to happen. Sprint can't afford to give a competitor an advantage like that.

 

Well, SoftBank would be paying any break up fee.

 

But I agree.  Past history does not guarantee future results.  Far too many magentans think that -- because of the failed AT&T-T-Mobile proceedings -- the FCC and/or DoJ will also block a potential Sprint-T-Mobile, and T-Mobile will snooker another big break up fee.  No, that was all due to AT&T hubris in believing that it could ramrod through approval of the merger.  The circumstances surrounding this proposed acquisition are very different.

 

AJ

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deval - what you are saying goes against what reality is.

 

Churn and margins are improving, not decreasing.  They're becoming a more valuable carrier with the actions they've taken.  This is likely causing Son to be ticked off, as it is jacking up the acquisition cost of T-Mobile.  Deutsche Telekom was just bragging about how T-Mobile is back to the level at which AT&T tried to acquire them.

 

Given the current market, I suspect Son is trying to move quickly in a rising rate environment combined with a company that is growing its enterprise value rather quickly.

 

I'm all for their changes, but I really want to see how it looks a year from now. In terms of finance, as their numbers speak for themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Churn and margins are improving, not decreasing.

 

I am still not buying it.  If T-Mobile persists, these cut rate strategies will come home to roost in due time.  A peak now will turn into a trough later, as people pile onto the T-Mobile network, then get a taste of its diminishing returns and coverage limitations.

 

If I am wrong, I give up -- I am done with this industry.  I will either drop all cellphone service or just blindly go along with the rest of the VZW, AT&T, and T-Mobile cattle.

 

AJ

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am still not buying it.  If T-Mobile persists, these cut rate strategies will come home to roost in due time.  A peak now will turn into a trough later, as people pile onto the T-Mobile network, then get a taste of its diminishing returns and coverage limitations.

 

If I am wrong, I give up -- I am done with this industry.  I will either drop all cellphone service or just blindly go along with the rest of the VZW, AT&T, and T-Mobile cattle.

 

AJ

 

 

That is one of the more interesting questions that only time will answer.  I am sure we are not the only ones wondering if T-Mobile's churn is going to escalate when they are xfering subs from substantially larger carriers with substantially larger coverage footprints - TBD one that.

 

In the meantime, relavent to Softbank/Sprint - it definitely changes the valuation of T-Mobile today, impacting what Son will offer.  That's how this all comes together.

 

Son, at that point, can do what he did in Japan - KDDI and NTT vs. Softbank  or in the USA AT&T and VZN vs. SprintSon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know Nextel employed the same strategy before getting acquired by Sprint. It's called pump and dump. They pumped their rolls with Boost people, knowing full well they could not accomodate them all in their network, falied to deploy the infamous 6:1 codec widely, etc, etc. I firmly believe that is exactly what's happening right now. They want to be bought out and they are pumping their value up.

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remain very excited by Son and his legacy of success. Whether he gets Tmo or not, hes has zero love or responsibility towards the sprint of old that would influence future decisions. Im going to go ahead and predict that we get either a NEW LOGO and branding or a NEW NAME altogether by 2015 regardless of mergers or acquisitions.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know Nextel employed the same strategy before getting acquired by Sprint. It's called pump and dump. They pumped their rolls with Boost people, knowing full well they could not accomodate them all in their network, falied to deploy the infamous 6:1 codec widely, etc, etc. I firmly believe that is exactly what's happening right now. They want to be bought out and they are pumping their value up.

 

And Bingo was his name...

 

Edit:

 

As an aside, I was reading Verizon's earnings call transcript and Fran Shammo pretty much summed up what I've been thinking since the start of this uncarrier stuff.

 

http://seekingalpha.com/article/1957221-verizon-communications-management-discusses-q4-2013-results-earnings-call-transcript

 

 

First off, let me just reiterate the fact that I know there has been a lot of questions around a price war and if you really look at what’s going on really what’s the shift of pricing is between service and equipment and really when you do the math, there really isn’t much of a price decrease here. It’s just a shift of how that’s marketed into the consumer market.

 

People are falling all over themselves ball washing John Legere like he's the second coming when in reality all he's doing is running a game of three-card monte.

  • Like 16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright guys, lets not make this into another T-Mobile thread...

 

:P

 

-Anthony

It's so easy to turn it into one though. General topics has been plagued with magenta. We need an antivirus before our blood changes color and our cheeks turn magenta colored. Next thing you know we will all shrink in size and be dancing around Legerre at his expos.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be insane to see those Softbank style commercials here in the States with a Sprint dog named "Sparky". Perhaps he will go into space as well. Sprint could be the first to create a 4G network on the moon.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the "change" that is making any inroads in the industry is the shift from a subsidized model to a non-subsidized. It will force customers to be smarter and more careful with their devices, because "they" will be paying for it. The money per month, downpayment, etc. is coming out of their pocket, so the state of the device is top of mind.

 

If I could get the newest phone whenever I want, and pay a per-month charge for it, I would do it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the "change" that is making any inroads in the industry is the shift from a subsidized model to a non-subsidized. It will force customers to be smarter and more careful with their devices, because "they" will be paying for it.

 

You mean these phones do not cost $200?  WTF, I want my $200 phone!

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be insane to see those Softbank style commercials here in the States with a Sprint dog named "Sparky". Perhaps he will go into space as well. Sprint could be the first to create a 4G network on the moon.

Hell yes. Sprint, make it happen. Also make a commercial where Otosan makes a cameo.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reminds me of those funny old Taco Bell commercial where the dog passes the TV that has Jeopardy and he gives the answer.

 

Otosan is sitting there watching a T-Mobile commercial and he blurbs out "Bullshit" or "baloney" (due to censors) and turns to Sparky and start a conversation about Framily, Now, etc.

 

Otosan and Sparky. the possibilities are endless. Come on Son make it so.  :D

 

TS

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can just see you chasing Sprint store reps now, exactly like this (except perhaps without the bike):

 

Speaking of which, when are we going over to your grandma's house for dinner?  Of course, I hope that you are picking up the check.

 

Oh, wait, wrong John Cusack 80s movie...

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean these phones do not cost $200?  WTF, I want my $200 phone!

 

;)

 

AJ

 

Yep, just had a long discussion at work about the last 14 years of wireless industry that I've been a part of, and how it has all been a subsidized model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, just had a long discussion at work about the last 14 years of wireless industry that I've been a part of, and how it has all been a subsidized model.

I've only been apart of it for 3 years but man is it changing. Its about to be real interesting when the subsidies are gone.

 

Sent from tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, just had a long discussion at work about the last 14 years of wireless industry that I've been a part of, and how it has all been a subsidized model.

 

And now the MVNO's are going.... "wait!?!  that's what we do, just charge the service cost and not the service+device rolled into one!"  I think it's great except for all the programs that are further gouging the customers with financing their devices but hey if people are stupid then why not, it's their choice to pay for it or finance it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...