Jump to content

Galaxy S22 thread


PythonFanPA

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, mdob07 said:

Thanks, I'll try to clean it later. I've tried different charger and different cables and still have the issue. I can tell a difference plugging in the same cable on my AT&T S22 Ultra vs my T-Mobile S22 Ultra. AT&T feels much looser. 

Loose connections for me have often meant lint.  While you would think compressed air or a paper clip would work, my best results have come from using the sharp end of a safety pin. Rarely have I needed to replace the charging port.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

Update is out for T-Mobile Locked.

 

I guess the last few months' trend of unlocked getting them first is over....I've been checking almost daily the last 7-10 days and nothing yet here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PythonFanPA said:

 

I guess the last few months' trend of unlocked getting them first is over....I've been checking almost daily the last 7-10 days and nothing yet here.

I guess there was nothing special T-Mo needed to shoehorn in on this one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

S22+  Unlocked update was finally released today:

 

Galaxy S22+ (SM-S906U1)


Build Number : S906U1UEU2CWE8
Android version : T(Android 13)
Release Date : 2023-06-26
Security patch level : 2023-06-01
• Software and Terms & Conditions Update
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: This update includes revised Terms & Conditions for your device, including the Dispute Resolution Agreement with arbitration terms. For more information, review https://www.samsung.com/us/support/legal/mobile/.
By clicking “Install now,” by scheduling your install, or by continuing to use your device after installation, you agree to these revised Terms & Conditions.
• Stability and reliability
Device behavior has been improved.
• Security
The device is protected with improved security.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/26/2023 at 6:16 PM, PythonFanPA said:

S22+  Unlocked update was finally released today:

 

Galaxy S22+ (SM-S906U1)


Build Number : S906U1UEU2CWE8
Android version : T(Android 13)
Release Date : 2023-06-26
Security patch level : 2023-06-01
• Software and Terms & Conditions Update
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: This update includes revised Terms & Conditions for your device, including the Dispute Resolution Agreement with arbitration terms. For more information, review https://www.samsung.com/us/support/legal/mobile/.
By clicking “Install now,” by scheduling your install, or by continuing to use your device after installation, you agree to these revised Terms & Conditions.
• Stability and reliability
Device behavior has been improved.
• Security
The device is protected with improved security.

This update broke proper reporting of non-standalone 5g in SCP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

How so? On my locked TMO S22U, SCP still shows the limited amount of info that it always has for NSA.

This phone has factory unlocked firmware with T-Mobile and Verizon network, S22U1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jreuschl said:

July update out for locked. From S22 Reddits I think the unlocked is out in the last few days too.

Don't forget to install the Play Store updates after installing the July Security update. Seems like, at least on my phone, this recent update freed up a couple of additional Play Store updates as well. The first one was 10MB and the second was 39MB, with the second one bringing my Play Store revision up to June 2023. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/6/2023 at 7:27 AM, jreuschl said:

July update out for locked. From S22 Reddits I think the unlocked is out in the last few days too.

Was able to download/install on unlocked last night as well 👍

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/6/2023 at 12:39 PM, PedroDaGr8 said:

Don't forget to install the Play Store updates after installing the July Security update. Seems like, at least on my phone, this recent update freed up a couple of additional Play Store updates as well. The first one was 10MB and the second was 39MB, with the second one bringing my Play Store revision up to June 2023. 

I wonder if thats what broke my smart irrigation controls.

Disconnected me and wouldnt load up the app... had to do a few updates/off/on cycles, and then it finally worked

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
1 hour ago, PedroDaGr8 said:

OK, one thing this update added was a VoNR toggle under Settings--> Connections-->Mobile Networks.

Looks like TMO is making it official. 

not on the S23 Ultra for some reason.  i do see that i am unable to enable 2G mode anymore, not sure if this is a recent change or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Oddly the unlocked version is strange for GPlay System updates.  Finally picked up one tonight, restarted.....and it's still reflecting July 1.

 

Which, I've seen that behavior before, but after the locked version mention of an August update, I expected to finally see it here as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...