Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts



I’m not shocked at that. When news broke that they were planning to let go of boost I immediately thought, “boost could be player #4.” They already have millions of subs as is. Then it kills the argument of less choice. Downside is we’ll now have a smaller player at a “disadvantage” that Sprint and T-Mobile are complaining about currently.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Personally, I agree [emoji106]

My thoughts are if the DOJ are going to absolutely require Sprint and T-Mobile to help create another 4th Carrier, the Sprint should give up Boost Mobile and Virgin Mobile and T-Mobile should give up Metro. Then all three of the Pre-Paid brands can merge under one of the names. And The New T-Mobile can allow the new 4th Carrier to be a Pre-Paid brand and freely Roam on its New T-Mobile network.

Another possible option would be for Sprint and T-Mobile to sell all of their Pre-Paid brands to US Cellular or Comcast or Dish and one of those could become the 4th Carrier.

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No debt with Boost unlike Sprint
Exactly unlike Sprint which is encumbered with astronomical amounts a debt which is unfortunate. Boost doesn't have any debt so they could build out a network unencumbered. I'm still going to see what happens before I have any final thoughts.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was against this merger from the beginning. And now, after seeing that Sprint & T-Mobile are willing to divest spectrum, I'm more against it than ever before. Hacking apart 2 companies to make 2 more makes absolutely no sense. T-Mobile and Sprint have way too much debt now, and they will have even more after the merger. At this point, the FCC should withdraw their approval, the DOJ should sue to stop it, and the 2 companies should just go another route. There are plenty of other companies that have plenty of money and can afford to absorb the debt load of either company.

Otherwise, if Sprint & T-Mobile are allowed to merge, prices will have to be raised to astronomical proportions just to afford the monthly debt payments, and even then, The New T-Mobile could still fail, the new 4th carrier could still fail, and where would we be? 2 nationwide cellular carriers! This show from Legere and Claure needs to stop! It's gone off the deep end!

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint & T-Mobile will not be divesting any spectrum, not when Dish has plenty of spectrum. As I explained before Dish can be an MVNO of Sprint/T-Mobile and Sprint-Tmobile can host Dish's 600Mhz and AWS-3 holding right away. While they're at it they can also host Comcast's 600Mhz.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint & T-Mobile will not be divesting any spectrum, not when Dish has plenty of spectrum. As I explained before Dish can be an MVNO of Sprint/T-Mobile and Sprint-Tmobile can host Dish's 600Mhz and AWS-3 holding right away. While they're at it they can also host Comcast's 600Mhz.
I hope not. They need all the spectrum. Tmobile is getting a congested network now. If they have to give some up how will he network handle Sprint Customers on it?

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint & T-Mobile will not be divesting any spectrum, not when Dish has plenty of spectrum. As I explained before Dish can be an MVNO of Sprint/T-Mobile and Sprint-Tmobile can host Dish's 600Mhz and AWS-3 holding right away. While they're at it they can also host Comcast's 600Mhz.
Then the government should compel dish to sell the spectrum. Because those backwards morons aren't even using it.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then the government should compel dish to sell the spectrum. Because those backwards morons aren't even using it.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Totally Agree [emoji106]

Or since Dish has some much wireless spectrum, then maybe they should be given Boost Mobile and be pushed into being the new 4th Carrier

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally Agree [emoji106]

Or since Dish has some much wireless spectrum, then maybe they should be given Boost Mobile and be pushed into being the new 4th Carrier

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Yes they should. They should make dish cough up all its low-band spectrum. To help the carrier be competitive.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites




That, and I know l'll get flack here

But just imagine what Ray Nevelle could do with Sprints spectrum.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If dish will be made to cough up all its spectrum that it's hogging then then Sprint will be in a better position

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, danlodish345 said:

If dish will be made to cough up all its spectrum that it's hogging then then Sprint will be in a better position

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
 

Sprint doesn't have the money to buy Dish's spectrum at auction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint doesn't have the money to buy Dish's spectrum at auction.
Well maybe petition the government to have dish fork over the spectrum. Make them do a wireless version of eminent domain on dishes behind.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, danlodish345 said:

Well maybe petition the government to have dish fork over the spectrum. Make them do a wireless version of eminent domain on dishes behind.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
 

There's no way they would just give Sprint Dish's spectrum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no way they would just give Sprint Dish's spectrum. 
Well what the FCC could also do is revoke their licenses to the spectrum. That would force this to give it up.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If dish will be made to cough up all its spectrum that it's hogging then then Sprint will be in a better position

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk




I think you missed my Point


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites




I think you missed my Point


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What was your point? I'm also a bit drunk at the moment so I kind of miss everybody's point unfortunately.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, danlodish345 said:

Well what the FCC could also do is revoke their licenses to the spectrum. That would force this to give it up.

Yeah, then it would go to auction in which Sprint would have no money to participate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, then it would go to auction in which Sprint would have no money to participate. 
Well the FCC somehow has to make dish cough up that spectrum

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that Dish can even be brought into this. Yes, it seems insane to make Sprint and T-Mobile divest spectrum when Dish has so much, but let's not pretend that the current FCC and DOJ have any interest in things that would benefit CONSUMERS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, danlodish345 said:

Well the FCC somehow has to make dish cough up that spectrum

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
 

That's what the deadline is for. If they don't use enough of it buy the deadline then their licenses get revoked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what the deadline is for. If they don't use enough of it buy the deadline then their licenses get revoked. 
I wish that would happen

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, danlodish345 said:

I wish that would happen

From https://makespectrumgreatagain.com/:

Quote

If DISH doesn’t provide reliable coverage and service to 70% of the population in each of 176 geographic areas by March 7, 2020, then its licenses automatically terminate. The spectrum itself doesn’t go away, of course; the FCC will just re-auction it,

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...