Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Colorado Market (Denver/Colo Springs/Fort Collins/Pueblo/Grand Jct)


Craig

Recommended Posts

I notice that many of the sites Denver metro have been switching to EVDO on the weekends. What's up with that?

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

This has been going on downtown for quite some time.  On any given day a site could be EVDO or eHRPD.  My phone bounces between the two all day every day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has been going on downtown for quite some time.  On any given day a site could be EVDO or eHRPD.  My phone bounces between the two all day every day.

 

I wouldn't pay much attention to it.  My phones do it as well even in areas with 3G/4G sites, one phone might say eHRPD and the other says EVDO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is not adding any additional sites as part of Network Vision specifically. They are always adding sites, as planned out in the last several years. Sometimes in step with Network Vision, sometimes not. 1 or 2 new sites go online each month across the country. So it's possible they may add a site here or there, but no massive expansion is planned for the foreseeable future.

 

When Sprint finalizes it Band 41 nationwide expansion plans, you may see more Sprint sites popping up filling in holes and expanding to recently built up areas.

I was wonfering this myself because I have seen a loy of tower work here in pueblo. Not sure if they are even sprint towers but ive noticed at least 3 or 4 new sites. I even noticed an old enterprise rental sign turned into what looks something like a site.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take a picture of one or two of them when they are done.  We might be able to figure out which network they belong to. 

 

I was wonfering this myself because I have seen a loy of tower work here in pueblo. Not sure if they are even sprint towers but ive noticed at least 3 or 4 new sites. I even noticed an old enterprise rental sign turned into what looks something like a site.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A man who had 2 sprint towers on his land got angry because of two late $800 payments, so he got a tractor and some cables, then he toppled the two towers. Caused $600,000+ damage.

 

This knocked out the planned 4g upgrade between Fort Collins and Grand Junction Colorado. Speeds have dropped quite a bit.... sometimes near dialup.

 

 

Also heard there was a plan to speed up some western towns in early October, but that this will slip back to Spring 2014.

 

This new bit deserves some additional input.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A man who had 2 sprint towers on his land got angry because of two late $800 payments, so he got a tractor and some cables, then he toppled the two towers. Caused $600,000+ damage.

 

This knocked out the planned 4g upgrade between Fort Collins and Grand Junction Colorado. Speeds have dropped quite a bit.... sometimes near dialup.

 

 

Also heard there was a plan to speed up some western towns in early October, but that this will slip back to Spring 2014.

 

This new bit deserves some additional input.

Source?

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A man who had 2 sprint towers on his land got angry because of two late $800 payments, so he got a tractor and some cables, then he toppled the two towers. Caused $600,000+ damage.

 

This knocked out the planned 4g upgrade between Fort Collins and Grand Junction Colorado. Speeds have dropped quite a bit.... sometimes near dialup.

 

 

Also heard there was a plan to speed up some western towns in early October, but that this will slip back to Spring 2014.

 

This new bit deserves some additional input.

If this actually happened it seems to me there would be some report of it on a news site somewhere. I've done a quick search on Google and haven't come up with anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A man who had 2 sprint towers on his land got angry because of two late $800 payments, so he got a tractor and some cables, then he toppled the two towers. Caused $600,000+ damage.

 

This knocked out the planned 4g upgrade between Fort Collins and Grand Junction Colorado. Speeds have dropped quite a bit.... sometimes near dialup.

 

 

Also heard there was a plan to speed up some western towns in early October, but that this will slip back to Spring 2014.

 

This new bit deserves some additional input.

 

This sounds like some sort of an urban legend type thing. 

 

First of all, in order to have *two* towers, this guy would have to have a lot of land. If he did knock them down, it would most certainly have made the news.

 

Second, there's no way it would affect the rest of the NV upgrade plans, let alone as far away as Grand Junction. If it was a microwave chain, it could affect a couple of sites, but not more than a couple given the terrain. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sounds like some sort of an urban legend type thing. 

 

First of all, in order to have *two* towers, this guy would have to have a lot of land. If he did knock them down, it would most certainly have made the news.

 

Second, there's no way it would affect the rest of the NV upgrade plans, let alone as far away as Grand Junction. If it was a microwave chain, it could affect a couple of sites, but not more than a couple given the terrain. 

Personally I REALLY hope this is true.  I realize it would suck for a lot of Sprint customers, but let's be real honest about this, how awesome would that be?  I'm going to start asking all the farmers around me with towers on their land if they are getting late payments from the provider and if, by some act of the immaculate, they would let me knock those towers over with a tractor.

This story has given hope to all grown men hoping to appease their inner adolescent.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So. I am a tech working hands on with the rollout. Because of NDAs and job security issues I will have to keep most of the details on the vague side. Needless to say this equipment is very, very fast. Unfortunately, the rollout is not going as speedy as planned. I can assure you that I have been to every corner of this fine state to personally see the equipment. It is EVERYWHERE. Based on some inside info on rollout expect Grand Junction and CoSprings to go live a lot faster than Denver will. Ohh, and 800LTE is already in the pipe. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

    The man who told me this owns a MVNO cell phone and repair shop.  I know he is very competent.

 

No reason to spin a story. 

 

please note:  the speeds off the near tower which were 500-800 last July have dropped to 14-35 kbps upload, pings near 800, and uploads usually below 50 and often zero.  I personally know the new Samsung 4G equipment was installed in August, but "netvision" is not ready.

 

Sprint service says our "tower issues" for 5 towers nearby will be fixed about November 11th, and speed upgraded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joke's over. Please stop wasting our time. No reason to think you're spinning the story, just no reason to think it is anything BUT a story. This man, he may be very competent in cell phone repair, but that does not mean that he doesn't spread stories to get a rise out of people such as yourself. Seems to have worked in this case. I know plenty of very competent people that love to embellish the truth or even exercise their creativity with total fabrications. Provide some kind of documentation, or please, cease talking about this "incident" that, until proven otherwise, never happened. 

If you were a sponsor, you could see that yes, there are a large number of sites known to be "in progress" around the Denver area, and CO in general. Most still don't have the "netvision" (Network Vision) turned on yet for various reasons, mostly hypothesized to be related to backhaul delays. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the tall tales aside, northern colorado springs is going through some data woes, just like I had in San Antonio when they were upgrading sites. Intermittant connection issues and such. I remember those were resolved once the site was done with testing and fully online. Getting some dropped calls too, but again, nothing major.

 

Sent from my GT-P7310 using Tapatalk 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This site is built but not live. eNB 41150 is still live. eNB 41188 is decommissioned but as far as I can tell the site at 200 West 55th is not built yet. This site is live gNB 1346302. This site is live gNB 1092074 This site is live gNB 1371671 This site is live gNB 1371860 — — — — — Sprint eNB 6156 -> T-Mobile gNB 1349260 Sprint eNB Unknown -> T-Mobile gNB 1325016 — — — — — Bonus T-Mobile 5G small cell, gNB 1348688 in Queens:  
    • FTTH JVs are city by city as well, so it's not going to really be sector by sector. It sounds like TMo wants to be able to sell everyone home broadband, but if that requires building additional infrastructure that infra will take the form of FTTH builds rather than mobile densification. Which involves tradeoffs, but the product is better than e.g. what AT&T is doing for me right now, which is offering only Internet Air in an area where they have 100/20 DSL available but not (yet) fiber.
    • Hopefully they do not wait until these sectors get so overloaded that they start getting nasty reviews and people abandon them. Getting fiber coverage to the area of a overloaded sector can take a year or more. I also question if this can all be managed.  Lots of sectors all over the country can get congested fairly quick.  Lots of work and money to get fiber installed and there goes the profitability on the venture.
    • MoffetNathanson Conference This is a conference where the CFO talks telecom financial analysts so obviously it takes a return on investment approach.  Broadly T-Mobile divides there world into top 100 markets (60%) and small town/rural (40%). They ultimately want to have at least 1/3 market share in rural. They also look at demographics like 50+ and Hispanic.  Reputation is now starting to help them with CIOs.  Did mention c-band buildout beginning in major cities as well as continued band migration to 5g. IMO they may become more aggressive at offering 5g phones to LTE holdover and 5g users without VoNR at a future date. mmWave not discussed. Price increases not discussed iirc. Did mention spectrum purchases from speculators. $9 billion all goes through same ROI process. FWA is down to hexagonal patterns by sector of fallow spectrum. Fiber JVs will go where sectors are overloaded.
    • I am lucky to be served by an excellent fiber ISP and that is the only reason I haven't tried TMOs FWA. Once you go fiber, it is REALLY hard to go back. The choice of sub-10ms ping times is a very artificial bucket, FWA will seldom get much below 10ms ping times but fiber regularly gets me 1-3ms ping times. Basically, at around those times, the speed of light and the distance you are from the server become the limiting factors. As an aside, my internet provider, ZiplyFiber, has been awesome. They peer like crazy at all the major IX in the area and, as a result, you end up with what essentially amounts to direct fiber connections to the vast majority of major data sources. While it isn't sexy, it makes my 1Gb/1Gb connection load pages significantly faster than my works 10Gb/10Gb connection. On the "sexy" side, they are also fastest ISP in the nation. They offer up to 50Gb/50Gb via a direct fiber connection to the router, albeit for an eye watering $900/mo.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...