Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Colorado Market (Denver/Colo Springs/Fort Collins/Pueblo/Grand Jct)


Craig

Recommended Posts

Will sprint lte go up ? I went to Castle Rock and lte was nice but bit slow. I was expecting 30 mb but only got 4 mbs sometimes it wen up to 10 mbs

what kind of signal are you getting?  I get a decent signal at my house and consistently it's between 7.5-15 mb, but typically sits right at 10.  My signal strength is usually around -100 dBm.  This is with the exact same phone as you have.  I will also say that I have noticed that the speeds definitely fluctuate.  I have seen slower speeds than what I am used to with a better signal, so there may be some question as to the quality of the signal as well affecting your speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will sprint lte go up ? I went to Castle Rock and lte was nice but bit slow. I was expecting 30 mb but only got 4 mbs sometimes it wen up to 10 mbs

 

Only in ideal conditions will you get 30Mbps. That is near the theoretical max speed of Sprint's network. 

 

Sprint advertises speeds of 6-8Mbps. Don't go around expecting 30Mbps. Once every single site is completed, you'll probably see speeds settling around 10Mbps in most places, with pockets of higher speeds. In reality, 4-6Mbps is fast enough for pretty much anything you'll need to do on your phone.

 

As posted above, signal strength plays into the speeds you will see. Speeds are highly dependent on your signal, if you have a weak signal, don't expect to see speeds higher than about 3 or 4Mbps. A moderate signal will yield speeds usually between 6 and 15Mbps. A strong signal will get you that 15+ speed. 

 

Note that if there is only one sites active in an area, speeds will not be representative of the final network since that site will be handling more users than normal. There is currently only one sites active in Castle Rock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tower in woodland park and the one south of woodland park colorado are not 1x800 active yet i drove up there and no 1x800 so im not sure why the map on s4gru says its complete if its not active yet? could someone tell me if im wrong or why is there no 1x800 yet on those two towers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tower in woodland park and the one south of woodland park colorado are not 1x800 active yet i drove up there and no 1x800 so im not sure why the map on s4gru says its complete if its not active yet? could someone tell me if im wrong or why is there no 1x800 yet on those two towers

Which PRL do you have on your phone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tower in woodland park and the one south of woodland park colorado are not 1x800 active yet i drove up there and no 1x800 so im not sure why the map on s4gru says its complete if its not active yet? could someone tell me if im wrong or why is there no 1x800 yet on those two towers

All the 800 sites along I-25 between Walsenburg and Denver were live for me yesterday. Your phone will not connect to 800 if it is on 1900. It will not even search for 800 until you lose 1900 service. Next time you are in range, do a PRL update. It won't actually change your PRL, but it will force your device to rescan starting with 800 first.

 

Also, another note. We don't have live site maps, we have accepted site maps. We get the data from Sprint when they accept a technology as complete for each site. Sometimes they go live before acceptance, during acceptance or after acceptance. It's just the way it is.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a few posts in the sites in the "report sites in progress" thread.  Definitely worth dropping a few dollars to get access to! :)

I will hopefully soon, I just have literally had no extra scratch lately!  That's what having a baby, and buying a house within a month of each other do to your finances...  :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are dozens of sites I've seen from Walsenburg up through Denver that have new panels/RRU's installed but not yet accepted. They do have their ass in gear. Please stop the blathering.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

As someone who lives in one of the most densely populated areas of Denver, I'm going to have to disagree with this. Sprint service is borderline unusable anytime there is a Rockies game or festival downtown. 

 

Only LTE signal I've picked up is cruising down to the Springs coming through Castle Rock. I'm hoping they light things up soon. Sprint is a far cry cheaper than Verizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As someone who lives in one of the most densely populated areas of Denver, I'm going to have to disagree with this. Sprint service is borderline unusable anytime there is a Rockies game or festival downtown. 

 

Only LTE signal I've picked up is cruising down to the Springs coming through Castle Rock. I'm hoping they light things up soon. Sprint is a far cry cheaper than Verizon.

 

It's OK that you're wrong.  How can you say you disagree with this statement that I made? "There are dozens of sites I've seen from Walsenburg up through Denver that have new panels/RRU's installed but not yet accepted."  It's true and verifiable.  I didn't say there was lots live.  But if you had a Sprint Triband LTE device, about 2/3 of the City of Denver is covered with Band 41 LTE.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As someone who lives in one of the most densely populated areas of Denver, I'm going to have to disagree with this. Sprint service is borderline unusable anytime there is a Rockies game or festival downtown. 

 

Only LTE signal I've picked up is cruising down to the Springs coming through Castle Rock. I'm hoping they light things up soon. Sprint is a far cry cheaper than Verizon.

 

I can back Robert up there, when I was in Denver two weeks ago, I saw a good number of sites with NV gear installed. Many many more have been installed since then. If you were a sponsor, you could see just how many it is. Though I'm sure it slowed a bit with all the rain and flooding this past week. Data was not terrible for me, and I was all over the place. I was able to stream CNN Live on my phone on just 3G from north Denver through Broomfield into Boulder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's OK that you're wrong.  How can you say you disagree with this statement that I made? "There are dozens of sites I've seen from Walsenburg up through Denver that have new panels/RRU's installed but not yet accepted."  It's true and verifiable.  I didn't say there was lots live.  But if you had a Sprint Triband LTE device, about 2/3 of the City of Denver is covered with Band 41 LTE.

 

Robert

 

Not the part I was talking about, nice presumption though. This is what I was disagreeing with:

 

 

They do have their ass in gear.

 

 

But, continue to assume you know what I was intending when talking about your response. Clearly, I am "wrong."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not the part I was talking about, nice presumption though. This is what I was disagreeing with:

 

 

But, continue to assume you know what I was intending when talking about your response. Clearly, I am "wrong."

 

Maybe you should only quote the part you intend to disagree with instead of quoting the whole part about multiple sites being updated. Next time, quote only what you are disagreeing with as you just did above and then you won't have to try and save face while being a tool and back peddling. 

 

I saw nothing wrong with Robert's reply since you took the entire post and quoted it, in effect saying that everything in the post was a lie. Instead of getting all defensive, try to look at your posts before you hit the submit button. 

 

Back on topic, hopefully now that the rains are gone and things are starting to dry out, the inspectors can get out and start looking at some of those NV sites that are, in fact updated with the gear since they do, after all have their ar$ses in gear. 

 

Edit: Your phone seems to be the issue. It's a known LTE dud, so there is another of your problems.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, I'm new to this site so forgive me if I ask a silly question...does anyone think its a bad idea to port from at&t to Sprint? I'm thinking about getting the 5S on Friday, and I keep reading that its missing band 41 of LTE. Is that a cause for concern? I really enjoy my LTE with at&t, but I would like unlimited data with Sprint. Does anyone know how Sprints network is in the 80016 zip code of Aurora not too far from Southlands mall? I live close to where Gun Club and Aurora Parkway meet.

 

 

 

Sent from my RM-915_nam_usa_228 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, I'm new to this site so forgive me if I ask a silly question...does anyone think its a bad idea to port from at&t to Sprint? I'm thinking about getting the 5S on Friday, and I keep reading that its missing band 41 of LTE. Is that a cause for concern? I really enjoy my LTE with at&t, but I would like unlimited data with Sprint. Does anyone know how Sprints network is in the 80016 zip code of Aurora not too far from Southlands mall? I live close to where Gun Club and Aurora Parkway meet.

 

 

 

Sent from my RM-915_nam_usa_228 using Tapatalk

 

Yes it's a big mistake. Denver, Colorado is a clearwire Phase 1 priority market with more than a hundred TD-LTE Band 41 sites live and active whereas Sprint Band 25/26 LTE (PCS & SMR) are still fairly limited and have lower speeds than what a fully upgraded TD-LTE site can spew out. 

 

Anyone in a clearwire wimax market absolutely should get a triband device no matter what to take advantage of the TD-LTE network that is being rapidly deployed all across the nation over existing wimax sites. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why, but I'm set on the 5S. Well I would luv a Nokia Lumia Windows Phone device but it doesn't look like that will be coming to Sprint...are there no plans to add bands 25/26 LTE to the Denver area? At least within the next 6 months?

 

 

 

Sent from my RM-915_nam_usa_228 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why, but I'm set on the 5S. Well I would luv a Nokia Lumia Windows Phone device but it doesn't look like that will be coming to Sprint...are there no plans to add bands 25/26 LTE to the Denver area? At least within the next 6 months?

 

 

 

Sent from my RM-915_nam_usa_228 using Tapatalk

 

There is but TD-LTE will be long completed and live throughout the Denver area before Band 25/26 becomes ubiquitous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why, but I'm set on the 5S. Well I would luv a Nokia Lumia Windows Phone device but it doesn't look like that will be coming to Sprint...are there no plans to add bands 25/26 LTE to the Denver area? At least within the next 6 months?

 

 

 

Sent from my RM-915_nam_usa_228 using Tapatalk

They are currently adding Band 25 around Denver. There are only about 3-4 sites live now. Mostly around DIA. There will be approximately 20-30 live in the next 3 months, and maybe 70-100 in 6 months.

 

They are also starting to add Band 26 to sites in the Denver area in the next few months. But within 6 months, they will probably only have two dozen live.

 

So if those timelines work for you, then Sprint may be a viable option. If you need widespread LTE coverage, then you need a Band 41 device or you may want to ride it out with ATT.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would band 41 be accessible on the iPhone 5S though a software update? Or is it just completely missing from the hardware?

 

I'm not even sure Sprint is a good carrier in my zip code of 80016. When I checked the network.sprint.com website, they didn't seem to have too many towers where I live.

 

 

 

Sent from my RM-915_nam_usa_228 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is but TD-LTE will be long completed and live throughout the Denver area before Band 25/26 becomes ubiquitous.

 

 

I want to lock myself into unlimited data, before it is no longer offered. Sounds like it may be a painful transition tho.

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my RM-915_nam_usa_228 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would band 41 be accessible on the iPhone 5S though a software update? Or is it just completely missing from the hardware?

 

I'm not even sure Sprint is a good carrier in my zip code of 80016. When I checked the network.sprint.com website, they didn't seem to have too many towers where I live.

 

 

 

Sent from my RM-915_nam_usa_228 using Tapatalk

 

It would be a hardware limitation, so it will never see LTE 41.

 

Look at Sensorly.com (or the app) for good real-world coverage maps. Also, Sprint does have a trial period. You could always sign up and see how the service is where you need it. Not sure how porting works if you were to decide to go back to ATT, though.

 

I believe Sprint stated not too long ago that they were not going to drop unlimited data in the foreseeable future. I'm thinking a few years at minimum. They will probably see how their subscriber base is after NV 2.0 and how their network is holding up and evaluate it then. 

Edited by Craig
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, I'm new to this site so forgive me if I ask a silly question...does anyone think its a bad idea to port from at&t to Sprint? I'm thinking about getting the 5S on Friday, and I keep reading that its missing band 41 of LTE. Is that a cause for concern? I really enjoy my LTE with at&t, but I would like unlimited data with Sprint. Does anyone know how Sprints network is in the 80016 zip code of Aurora not too far from Southlands mall? I live close to where Gun Club and Aurora Parkway meet.

 

 

 

Sent from my RM-915_nam_usa_228 using Tapatalk

I just moved north from the 80015 area code.  Voice coverage is great, but don't expect great things as far as data coverage goes.  3g speeds rarely get to 1 Mbps, 4G in my experience has been non-existent.  While I don't live down there, I still visit folks down there fairly regularly.  I would say that I get as many hits as most people in this forum, with a few hits of 4G that nobody else seems to be getting, and I have never even had a slight flicker of 4G in that area of town.

If it's network speeds you are concerned about, Spring may not be your best option for a while yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This site is built but not live. eNB 41150 is still live. eNB 41188 is decommissioned but as far as I can tell the site at 200 West 55th is not built yet. This site is live gNB 1346302. This site is live gNB 1092074 This site is live gNB 1371671 This site is live gNB 1371860 — — — — — Sprint eNB 6156 -> T-Mobile gNB 1349260 Sprint eNB Unknown -> T-Mobile gNB 1325016 — — — — — Bonus T-Mobile 5G small cell, gNB 1348688 in Queens:  
    • FTTH JVs are city by city as well, so it's not going to really be sector by sector. It sounds like TMo wants to be able to sell everyone home broadband, but if that requires building additional infrastructure that infra will take the form of FTTH builds rather than mobile densification. Which involves tradeoffs, but the product is better than e.g. what AT&T is doing for me right now, which is offering only Internet Air in an area where they have 100/20 DSL available but not (yet) fiber.
    • Hopefully they do not wait until these sectors get so overloaded that they start getting nasty reviews and people abandon them. Getting fiber coverage to the area of a overloaded sector can take a year or more. I also question if this can all be managed.  Lots of sectors all over the country can get congested fairly quick.  Lots of work and money to get fiber installed and there goes the profitability on the venture.
    • MoffetNathanson Conference This is a conference where the CFO talks telecom financial analysts so obviously it takes a return on investment approach.  Broadly T-Mobile divides there world into top 100 markets (60%) and small town/rural (40%). They ultimately want to have at least 1/3 market share in rural. They also look at demographics like 50+ and Hispanic.  Reputation is now starting to help them with CIOs.  Did mention c-band buildout beginning in major cities as well as continued band migration to 5g. IMO they may become more aggressive at offering 5g phones to LTE holdover and 5g users without VoNR at a future date. mmWave not discussed. Price increases not discussed iirc. Did mention spectrum purchases from speculators. $9 billion all goes through same ROI process. FWA is down to hexagonal patterns by sector of fallow spectrum. Fiber JVs will go where sectors are overloaded.
    • I am lucky to be served by an excellent fiber ISP and that is the only reason I haven't tried TMOs FWA. Once you go fiber, it is REALLY hard to go back. The choice of sub-10ms ping times is a very artificial bucket, FWA will seldom get much below 10ms ping times but fiber regularly gets me 1-3ms ping times. Basically, at around those times, the speed of light and the distance you are from the server become the limiting factors. As an aside, my internet provider, ZiplyFiber, has been awesome. They peer like crazy at all the major IX in the area and, as a result, you end up with what essentially amounts to direct fiber connections to the vast majority of major data sources. While it isn't sexy, it makes my 1Gb/1Gb connection load pages significantly faster than my works 10Gb/10Gb connection. On the "sexy" side, they are also fastest ISP in the nation. They offer up to 50Gb/50Gb via a direct fiber connection to the router, albeit for an eye watering $900/mo.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...