Jump to content

S4GRU Members Average Monthly Data Usage (with Poll)


Arysyn

S4GRU Members Average Monthly Data Usage  

207 members have voted

  1. 1. Your Average Monthly Data Usage, is



Recommended Posts

I should have clarified that I offload to Wifi whenever I'm home as well. I usually travel Mon-Thurs for work each week with limited wifi availability. I have two weeks at home this upcoming billing cycle, so it will be interesting to see usage for this next one. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have three lines, we typically go to 5 GB or less altogether. I cut us down to 8 GB shared when I realized the only months when we went over that (max 10.3 GB ) were when I was downloading custom roms over LTE. If I just don't do that we can save a ton of money. At one point we were paying close to $200 a month for three lines, now it's down to $115

Edited by djw39
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding of the poll -- though this was not explicitly stated -- is that it is intended to assess data usage per line, not per account, not per person across multiple lines/accounts.  Arysyn, is that correct?  If so, I am afraid that the poll now contains a contaminated data set.  Some users answered per line; others answered in total.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding of the poll -- though this was not explicitly stated -- is that it is intended to assess data usage per line, not per account, not per person across multiple lines/accounts.  Arysyn, is that correct?  If so, I am afraid that the poll now contains a contaminated data set.  Some users answered per line; others answered in total.

 

AJ

I answered based on my personal line.  Of all lines, we average between 20-30GBs a month, on a 6-line account.  I do believe that some have answered with entire account usage, instead of per line usage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding of the poll -- though this was not explicitly stated -- is that it is intended to assess data usage per line, not per account, not per person across multiple lines/accounts.  Arysyn, is that correct?  If so, I am afraid that the poll now contains a contaminated data set.  Some users answered per line; others answered in total.

 

AJ

 

AJ is correct. I meant this to be per individual, as I'm assuming not everyone has a family plan.

 

I'm very anti- multiple line "shared" data plans, as it can cause conflict in groups where some people go over their pre-arranged data consumption agreements. I'm in favor of a streamlined individual plan where people get more data for less money, rather than relying on buckets of shared data for value. Ever since Verizon took the initiative to eliminate individual plans with unlimited data, the pricing of individual lines has skyrocketed, all with the exception of Sprint, which is something I wholeheartedly respect Sprint for leading the way on forward standing strongly behind truly wonderful individual plan pricing. Even their shared data packages are worthwhile for individuals, if they need the tethering, but don't want to be forced into data sharing.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, the polled data set may have been polluted by some unintended responses about total data, not per line data.  But that is at least partly the fault of ambiguous instructions in the opening post.  Regardless, the data set may be large enough now that any spurious entries will not alter the overall trends.  So, I will leave this graphic for viewing, then follow up with some analysis tomorrow.

 

2ur57oj.png

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason I wasn't more specific about this in the initial post, is that I thought the title as pretty self explanatory, being the monthly usage, not monthly plan, members have. Nor did I indicate anything about group usage.

 

However, it seems most people understood what I meant. If anyone has a criticism towards me not being specific enough, then stop complaining about my posts being too long or novel-like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason I wasn't more specific about this in the initial post, is that I thought the title as pretty self explanatory, being the monthly usage, not monthly plan, members have. Nor did I indicate anything about group usage.

Actualy the Title isn't that self explanatory as you claim.
The title states "S4GRU members Average Monthly Data Usage" 
That can be viewed as per line or per account. Plus your intial post states "This poll post here is that I'm hoping will help start a discussion of data usage habits and such, while it also would be interesting to see how much data Sprint gets through its network from people on this site." That to me is not asking data per line but how much data (thereby indicating all data from all lines) from the account holder going through Sprint.

 

As for this statement...

However, it seems most people understood what I meant. If anyone has a criticism towards me not being specific enough, then stop complaining about my posts being too long or novel-like.

 

One does not have to have long (novel-like) posts to outlined their points or agenda. A simple paragraph can spell out the specific details in this case. As for complaints about long posts, these are mainly from fellow members. Staff then intervenes and followup on them.    

 

TS

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone has a criticism towards me not being specific enough, then stop complaining about my posts being too long or novel-like.

There is a difference between a concise post and a long post with irrelevant fluff.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a difference between a concise post and a long post with irrelevant fluff.

 

None of my posts have been irrelevant. A concise post is fine when one figures they can put enough detail in a short amount of space. Although considering my history with people asking me question after question when I've tried to be concise, I've preferred to be more detailed in the beginning, so less questions or worse, false assumptions made about what I said because I didn't give enough detail to something I've said when I tried to be concise to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Actualy the Title isn't that self explanatory as you claim.
The title states "S4GRU members Average Monthly Data Usage" 
That can be viewed as per line or per account. Plus your intial post states "This poll post here is that I'm hoping will help start a discussion of data usage habits and such, while it also would be interesting to see how much data Sprint gets through its network from people on this site." That to me is not asking data per line but how much data (thereby indicating all data from all lines) from the account holder going through Sprint.

 

As for this statement...
 

One does not have to have long (novel-like) posts to outlined their points or agenda. A simple paragraph can spell out the specific details in this case. As for complaints about long posts, these are mainly from fellow members. Staff then intervenes and followup on them.    

 

TS

 

 

My title couldn't possibly imply to the account holder, in the state of multiple people in their account, as again, not everyone has multiple lines, nor does everyone on S4GRU have other members here on the site on their accounts. As far as I know, everyone here has their own accounts separate from each other. Anyone who isn't a member here, does not qualify for the poll. Only S4GRU members do. So rationally speaking, one line of usage from each member, key word here still is usage, not total amount of data purchased or used by others on the account.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll go see if I can find how much. I'm positive I use a lot.

 

From January and back, I was through straight talk.

 

I thought I used a lot in a month. I use 10-15 Gb because of Speedtest.net but I don't live in an area with a lot of Sprint coverage. I only have 1xRTT most of the time. I would love to have Spark while in my house I would use it all the time. BUT Dang 141 GB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to answer the poll, but my response would be flawed since LTE in my neck of the woods is still somewhat spotty and unreliable so I am on wifi most of the time (work & home) thankfully. Anyway I am a firm believer in offloading to wifi whenever I can as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My title couldn't possibly imply to the account holder, in the state of multiple people in their account, as again, not everyone has multiple lines, nor does everyone on S4GRU have other members here on the site on their accounts. As far as I know, everyone here has their own accounts separate from each other. Anyone who isn't a member here, does not qualify for the poll. Only S4GRU members do. So rationally speaking, one line of usage from each member, key word here still is usage, not total amount of data purchased or used by others on the account.  

 

I am sorry, Arysyn, but twospirits is right.  Your title and instructions are vague.  Additionally, you are making assumptions about S4GRU members that are incorrect.

 

A large number of members here have multiple lines or devices -- personal, business, tablet, hotspot, etc.  Furthermore, some of them have multiple lines on Sprint and other providers -- or have no Sprint service at all.  For example, our very own Robert answered with usage from his AT&T and/or VZW lines.  Because it is not Sprint, should that have been excluded from the poll?  It was not explicitly stated so.

 

So, your title and instructions have holes.  Do not take it personally.  Just admit that your intentions and directions do not fully match up.  We can always run the poll again, and likely most of the same membership would participate.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I stand by my wording regarding the individual vs the whole account issue, AJ does have a good point regarding I should have clarified a distinction between how much data is used as a whole with Sprint in contrast as a whole altogether Monthly, regardless of carrier, which I hadn't taken into consideration, that I can definitely understand the confusion on. I apologize for that.

 

I'm interested in monthly usage altogether, considering my recent posts regarding my interests in a financially reasonable per GB rate plan as a feasible alternative to unlimited plans. Although it also is interesting to know about Sprint usage as this is a Sprint information site. I think it is a good idea to have separate polls for both, and perhaps one for monthly plan purchases as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I typically use 3-5GB on my cellular iPad. On my iPhone I only use about 500MB of my monthly 5GB plan - the rest gets "banked". (Goes towards my fixed-installation LTE CPE at home)

 

I didn't participate in the poll since I'm outside the U.S. and don't want to skew the results.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got 4 lines with Sprint, 3 of which average about 2 to 4 GB/month each. The 4th line is a tablet, and averages about 1GB/Mo. About 10GB/Mo combined.  I've got a 40BG shared plan (with hotspot) and am paying only $146/month.  Win/Win: Good price, no worries.  :tu:

 

Edit: Arysyn, see how concise, yet complete that was? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • My understanding is the MNO carriers are the one who have objected to the use of cell phones in commercial planes.  I understand that it ties down too many cell phones at once, thus I can not see this changing. Private pilots have been using cellphones in planes for many decades. Far fewer phones at a lower altitude.
    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...