Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Phoenix Market (including Flagstaff, Prescott)


MaxPower

Recommended Posts

I live about a block from a Sprint tower and everyday this week there has been 1-3 trucks out there working on it, hope they are putting up some NV :D btw Im in Avondale, Avondale Blvd & Mcdowell

 

Good to hear the upgrades are expanding out to far West Phoenix. There's been a lot in central Phx, but the West has been sparse. Although, I saw some reports and pictures of NV work being done in Surprise in the Sponsor section of S4GRU. Are you in Goodyear, then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im very close to Goodyear. I saw a post here saying that they are going as far west as Buckeye and those were some of the first permits pulled for the valley. If I see those guys working on the tower tomorrow I will stop and talk to them and see if they can give me any insight :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

No LTE sites completed in PHX market yet. Just 3G upgrades so far. The sites with LTE upgrades accepted will change to yellow (to denote 3G/4G accepted). I'm thinking the first site is within 10-20 days by my guess.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Really>? Are you sure? Cause its looking kind of bleak for Phoenix... Seattle is all rip roaring with 4G already and phoenix had a headstart...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really>? Are you sure? Cause its looking kind of bleak for Phoenix... Seattle is all rip roaring with 4G already and phoenix had a headstart...

 

Seattle and Phoenix has different vendors with different methods of doing things.

 

Seattle is a Samsung market whose contractor tends to bring up 4G upgrades first and then 3G upgrades up in clusters. Pheonix is an Alcatel-Lucent market who brings up 3G upgrades first and then 4G upgrades. That and backhaul for seattle was most likely easier to acquire. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle and Phoenix has different vendors with different methods of doing things.

 

Seattle is a Samsung market whose contractor tends to bring up 4G upgrades first and then 3G upgrades up in clusters. Pheonix is an Alcatel-Lucent market who brings up 3G upgrades first and then 4G upgrades. That and backhaul for seattle was most likely easier to acquire. 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Who changed this thread title to include Lake Havasu? Lake Havasu is in the Las Vegas market. Tsk, tsk.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in Phoenix back in April and data was kind of pathetic. I was thinking "I bet it'll be way better when I come back here at the end of July". I'm going back next week and by the looks of this forum it hasn't changed much. It still sucks in Sacramento too so I feel your pain. At least we have 4G starting to light in a couple towns close to us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alcatel Lucent is the bain of my existence. Their deployment style irks me to no end. Light up Arizona with LTE, already!

 

Insert your favorite French jokes here:

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alcatel Lucent is the bain of my existence. Their deployment style irks me to no end. Light up Arizona with LTE, already! Insert your favorite French jokes here: Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

HAHA! No kidding!

In comparison to other markets, its it safe to say that AZ has had the most accepted sites without seeing any LTE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HAHA! No kidding!

In comparison to other markets, its it safe to say that AZ has had the most accepted sites without seeing any LTE?

I don't know. It sure seems that way.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HAHA! No kidding!

In comparison to other markets, its it safe to say that AZ has had the most accepted sites without seeing any LTE?

I would think so at least full build sites if u dont count like iowa. Even SLC got at least 1 LTE site and i know they started after phx and tucson

 

Sent from my Motorola Photon 4G using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole Phoenix thing eludes me to no end. How can Alcatel Lucent be pulling this off without p***ing off Sprint in the worst way. I just don't get this one bit. :scratch:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I have had an open ticket with Sprint Customer Care for the last few weeks due to signal quality issues at my work location downtown (Central & Washington in Phoenix).  Here is the information that I received from Sprint regarding the issues:


 


On July 18:  "We have marked that area for our engineers to look into this issue.  We are working on a tower in this area and this should be closed out shortly."


 


Today Sprint Customer Care says "I show at your billing address we will be adding 4G LTE within 3 to 6 months and the same timeframe applies for the downtown Phoenix location."


 


So if you convert 3 to 6 months in "Sprint time" to realtime, we should see 4G LTE in the Valley in 3-6 years.


 


I told them to leave the ticket open so that I can refer back to it in 3 months for all of my complaints for not having 4G lit up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So I have had an open ticket with Sprint Customer Care for the last few weeks due to signal quality issues at my work location downtown (Central & Washington in Phoenix).  Here is the information that I received from Sprint regarding the issues:

 

On July 18:  "We have marked that area for our engineers to look into this issue.  We are working on a tower in this area and this should be closed out shortly."

 

Today Sprint Customer Care says "I show at your billing address we will be adding 4G LTE within 3 to 6 months and the same timeframe applies for the downtown Phoenix location."

 

So if you convert 3 to 6 months in "Sprint time" to realtime, we should see 4G LTE in the Valley in 3-6 years.

 

I told them to leave the ticket open so that I can refer back to it in 3 months for all of my complaints for not having 4G lit up.  

 

ROFL ..... 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I was in Phoenix for the last couple of days and things actually seem a little better there. The same office I visited in Chandler, AZ where I had almost no 3G data back in April has improved. I speed tested around 450-500kbps there this time.  Also I was in constant roaming at my aunts house in Waddell, AZ in April (tiny town just northwest of Phoenix) and now I was getting 2-3 bars of Sprint service and about the same 450kbps on 3G.  In Phoenix itself I drove around to the mall and a few other places. Nothing mind blowing but I did manage a few speed tests that were just over 1mbps.  Certainly tolerable speeds. I still say you guys will see LTE before we do in Sacramento.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been following the Phoenix market for a while and I really feel bad for you guys.  I'm sure things have improved with all of the 3g upgrades, but that must be frustrating to see all that and no LTE.  I'm heading down there for some interviews in a couple weeks and I will keep my eyes peeled in my travels for any indications of backhaul being installed at any sites I will pass by.  I'm wishing you guys the best down there!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After lunch today, I was out in the parking lot and was texting my son-in-law when I got an error that the text did not go through. I noticed my signal bars were non-existent. I figured they were working on the tower or something. I launched SignalCheck Pro to see if I had any signal at all. Nothing. I went on about my work when I got an alert the I had not heard before. I looked at my phone and SignalCheck Pro showed I had 1XRTT 800! Of course I was in the middle of a task and couldn't get a screen shot. It was that way for only a minute or two and the next time I checked it was back to eHRPD.  

hopefully things are moving...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After lunch today, I was out in the parking lot and was texting my son-in-law when I got an error that the text did not go through. I noticed my signal bars were non-existent. I figured they were working on the tower or something. I launched SignalCheck Pro to see if I had any signal at all. Nothing. I went on about my work when I got an alert the I had not heard before. I looked at my phone and SignalCheck Pro showed I had 1XRTT 800! Of course I was in the middle of a task and couldn't get a screen shot. It was that way for only a minute or two and the next time I checked it was back to eHRPD.

hopefully things are moving...

You were probably on both and you lost the Evdo connection so it showed the 1x connection as being used for data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
    • Yeah both of those instances were on my AT&T s22 ultra. Seems ro be working as intended today in latest release.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...