Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Telesales was always Filipino, and were usually well trained and understandable.

Probably because I had an employee account, tech support was always stateside, and CS was always someone with a southern twang. That didn't seem to help with solving problems a whole lot as it always seems to be their systems that are the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've called a few times in the past few weeks and the Cs reps all have a strong Phillipino accent. All very nice and easy to understand but likely not a us based call center.

 

I've had to call Sprint cancellations various times the past few months as I've shifted a number of lines over to other providers.  It's been a while since I've had to do that, and before I always dealt with US call centers for non technical matters I would consider "delicate" (eg, back when they had a "retentions" group).  Every one of my recent calls so far has been routed to that call center in the Philippines (assuming so). They really need to re-train those reps and/or use better directional/noise cancelling mics.   I understand the dialect they use, and the things you can hear them talk about in the background sometimes is not appropriate - IMHO. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always make sure I go into corporate owned sprint stores and not authorized resellers. That helps with the cs experience.

Personally I completely agree!

 

I only go to corporate owned stores. I have gotten the best service at corporate owned stores.

I think every customer service call I've had since I got a new account when I purchased the Aquos Crystal last October has been through an International Call Bank. If technical, I will eventually get handed back stateside.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

There is a special Executive Customer Service number. A friend told me about it a few years ago. All of those calls go to a call center in North Carolina.

 

I have always gotten great customer service from the call center in NC.

 

...Probably because I had an employee account, tech support was always stateside, and CS was always someone with a southern twang...

Yup...that is the Executive Customer Service group.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read that article too. The last paragraph made me think that even though market analysts can be easily biased (thinking of the 2008 recession) they were confident that Sprint and Softbank could pull off an 18 to 24 month phased deployment of their densification plan at $5 billion. 

Thats a lot of money to spend in under 2 years!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That means good stuff for areas like mine, rural central alabama. ...sell the stuff that doesn't propagate well in these areas and install more of the band 25 and 26....even better if they use funds to buy into the low-band auction next year. I am not sure but i think the difference in 600, 700 and 800 would be negligible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That means good stuff for areas like mine, rural central alabama. ...sell the stuff that doesn't propagate well in these areas and install more of the band 25 and 26....even better if they use funds to buy into the low-band auction next year. I am not sure but i think the difference in 600, 700 and 800 would be negligible.

Just because you feel your area doesn't need 2.5ghz spectrum. Doesn't mean that the company doesn't need it to survive. I strongly disagree with Sprint selling any of their 2.5ghz spectrum. Especially to a competitor that they compete directly against strengthening their competition.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because you feel your area doesn't need 2.5ghz spectrum. Doesn't mean that the company doesn't need it to survive. I strongly disagree with Sprint selling any of their 2.5ghz spectrum. Especially to a competitor that they compete directly against strengthening their competition.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

I agree indy is night and day betterafter 2.5 started rolling out here.
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's great, you live in a big city where 2.5 would fair well, but sprint serves more than just big cities, and if they do what some suggest, they will essentially be the cdma version of Tmo. If it doesn't work in my area, what's the point in having it? I will never benefit from 2.5 in my small town. ....it just won't work well here with the tower placement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because you feel your area doesn't need 2.5ghz spectrum. Doesn't mean that the company doesn't need it to survive. I strongly disagree with Sprint selling any of their 2.5ghz spectrum. Especially to a competitor that they compete directly against strengthening their competition.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

I completely agree with tybo. I don't understand why these writers and analysts keep saying Sprint could and/or should sell this spectrum, when once Sprint gets their network plans completed and has at least 15x15 or more of this deployed on all towers without Ericsson managing the network (a suspicion I discussed with someone here offline as to a possible reason for the issues I experienced), then things ought to start getting much much better for Sprint.

 

If Sprint were to deploy half of that spectrum everywhere, it would take full advantage of LTE Advanced, with a lot more spectrum available for capacity if they were able to take significant business away from AT&T and Verizon. So, to sell that spectrum, any of it actually, would be to sell its future away.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's great, you live in a big city where 2.5 would fair well, but sprint serves more than just big cities, and if they do what some suggest, they will essentially be the cdma version of Tmo. If it doesn't work in my area, what's the point in having it? I will never benefit from 2.5 in my small town. ....it just won't work well here with the tower placement.

I don't have band 41 in my city but after the experience in Los Angeles proper this past month, I think B41 is more important than ever. My phone 6 stuck to a weak B41 signal more than a weak B25 signal.  I was pulling 5 to 20 megs depending if I was on a clear tower or an ALU equipment at -115 to -125 rsrp.  I have to disagree. Once you experience it, it will change your perception of it. 

 

As for propagation, i found it to be very adequate.  The only times I really lost B41 was deep in my hotel.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's great, you live in a big city where 2.5 would fair well, but sprint serves more than just big cities, and if they do what some suggest, they will essentially be the cdma version of Tmo. If it doesn't work in my area, what's the point in having it? I will never benefit from 2.5 in my small town. ....it just won't work well here with the tower placement.

I live in a big city. Here in Jacksonville Florida ( the largest city in the United States geographically) we didn't have a great indoor experience until Sprint deployed LTE and CDMA in the 800mhz range. Also band 41 is a big help even though it's basically playing hotspot duty. With all three bands enabled Sprint can go toe to toe with any carrier in my city. The same can happen in your city.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's great, you live in a big city where 2.5 would fair well, but sprint serves more than just big cities, and if they do what some suggest, they will essentially be the cdma version of Tmo. If it doesn't work in my area, what's the point in having it? I will never benefit from 2.5 in my small town. ....it just won't work well here with the tower placement.

 

That is bullshit to say you will "never benefit."  You clearly misunderstand the tiered nature of tri band deployment.

 

Many small towns are becoming rural ghettos.  Those left behind often lack access to good wired broadband or are unable to afford it.  As such, those small town people can be some of the largest consumers of wireless data.

 

If not now, every small town that Sprint serves needs band 41 deployed in the future.  Get those in range of band 41 off of band 25 and band 26.  Free up band 25 and band 26 for those people on the outskirts of town and on the highways.

 

That is the tiered nature of tri band deployment.

 

AJ

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an aside but on a related note, several of the earliest sites to receive band 41 deployment in the Kansas market were at exceedingly rural service areas and truck stops where long haul truckers often park overnight along I-70 and the Kansas Turnpike.

 

Think about it...

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Band 41 on Sprint worked very well on the few places it showed up for me when I had Sprint. Unfortunately though, I mostly experienced slow speeds on the other bands most of the time.

 

However, I have no doubt once Sprint gets band 41 out everywhere powered up on most towers and away from Ericsson's poor management, things will get a lot better for Sprint. So these mentions in the media of Sprint selling b41 spectrum is really stupid.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So with the nearest tower being 6.9 miles away, what exactly will band 41 do for me aside from being really nice when i walk around walmart? I'd benefit much more from band 26 LTE....but I'm curious with what's been said here about band 41 being 3 to 5 miles depending on adjustment. ...how will that do me any good at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So with the nearest tower being 6.9 miles away, what exactly will band 41 do for me aside from being really nice when i walk around walmart? I'd benefit much more from band 26 LTE....but I'm curious with what's been said here about band 41 being 3 to 5 miles depending on adjustment. ...how will that do me any good at all?

Have you ever thought what happens to band 25/26 when devices are getting shunted off band 25/26 to 41?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So with the nearest tower being 6.9 miles away, what exactly will band 41 do for me aside from being really nice when i walk around walmart? I'd benefit much more from band 26 LTE....but I'm curious with what's been said here about band 41 being 3 to 5 miles depending on adjustment. ...how will that do me any good at all?

What happens when there's 10,000 other people that lives within range of that site and thinks like you?

 

You'll have all those people on band 25/26 when the people closer to the tower which you say is near the Walmart that can be offloaded onto band 41.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being in a town of less than 5000 people, most who don't use sprint because they think it still sucks, I'm not seeing any slow down on 25/26 and 25 has been deployed here for 2 years. I still have 15mb downloads on 25 after 2 years of it being here. There are only 3 towers in a 25 mile radius around me, we aren't talking a large suburb here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So with the nearest tower being 6.9 miles away, what exactly will band 41 do for me aside from being really nice when i walk around walmart? I'd benefit much more from band 26 LTE....but I'm curious with what's been said here about band 41 being 3 to 5 miles depending on adjustment. ...how will that do me any good at all?

So if it does not benefit you in your home, then you don't think Sprint should do it? Every person who within B41 range in your sector will only improve your B25/26 experience. Sprint should put B41 everywhere, if it can afford it.

 

Also, B41 works better in rural areas where they crank up the power. It will cover about 75%-80% as far as B25. And with beamforming you can get to 100%. Sprint should rock B41 as far as they can afford.

 

Using Tapatalk on Nexus 6

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if it does not benefit you in your home, then you don't think Sprint should do it? Every person who within B41 range in your sector will only improve your B25/26 experience. Sprint should put B41 everywhere, if it can afford it.

 

Also, B41 works better in rural areas where they crank up the power. It will cover about 75%-80% as far as B25. And with beamforming you can get to 100%. Sprint should rock B41 as far as they can afford.

 

Using Tapatalk on Nexus 6

I hope you get a source for the B41 revised rollout.  Also, looks like this site may become quite active again once B41 starts going into full throttle.  :tu:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being in a town of less than 5000 people, most who don't use sprint because they think it still sucks, I'm not seeing any slow down on 25/26 and 25 has been deployed here for 2 years. I still have 15mb downloads on 25 after 2 years of it being here. There are only 3 towers in a 25 mile radius around me, we aren't talking a large suburb here

I grew up in rural WV (not as rural now and in Shentel's market!) and I agree that 25/26 is more than sufficient for a town of 5000 where maybe Sprint has 10-25% of the market. This is what Shentel is thinking according to their last earning call...B41 for the areas that need it but dual B25's + a B26 should be sufficient until the market grows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that's the case then I'm all for it, i guess it'll be wait and see how it works if they deploy it here. I live where there is a chunk of GMO towers, so seeing anything soon is. ..likely not in the stars for me. You guys know i don't bash sprint, and i gladly hand them a nice piece of change each month for my 5 phones and 3 tablets. ....i just want to get as much of a good experience as someone who lives in bham or Montgomery. It gets old when companies like my DSL provider, who is the only broadband provider in my area, happily refuses to give us decent service for the high price they charge...i want to be able to enjoy my cell service in the same manner as i would if i could get fios or charter Cable. Anyone who lives / has lived rurally knows what I'm saying. Seems like we are the last to get the decent stuff, which in turn causes slight resentment for some things that we wait on getting. I never had much resentment for sprint, i just would like them to bring some density to my area. There is a large swath of white in central alabama right where i am.

I've been waiting on a tower that has been live since Feb to be optimized so i can hopefully get rid of the airave I've had since 2008. Anxiety sucks

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
    • Looks like a great place for for FWA. Many apartment dwellers only have one overpriced choice.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...