Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I recall Günther answering during his Reddit AMA:

 

"We are controlling 800 MHz power to meet regulatory requirements."

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Sprint/comments/5ipysj/2nd_ama_here_we_come/dba3sdn/

 

Perhaps this is what he's referring to?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would this allow Sprint to launch 5x5 MHz b26 in areas of Ohio that are in the Inez...

 

Inez is in Texas, not Ohio.  And there is no basement at The Alamo.

 

faa1a8c536c6728c1b2ebe21f3bbfd32.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recall Günther answering during his Reddit AMA:

 

"We are controlling 800 MHz power to meet regulatory requirements."

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Sprint/comments/5ipysj/2nd_ama_here_we_come/dba3sdn/

 

Perhaps this is what he's referring to?

Really wish they could push it further, 800 isn't much better than B41/B25 realistically at least in my findings.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really wish they could push it further, 800 isn't much better than B41/B25 realistically at least in my findings.

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Perhaps this new FCC rule will enable Sprint to do that?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Inez is in Texas, not Ohio. And there is no basement at The Alamo.

 

faa1a8c536c6728c1b2ebe21f3bbfd32.jpg

 

AJ

being serious though.....thoughts on the article and the restrictions on b26 in Ohio and other regions?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really wish they could push it further, 800 isn't much better than B41/B25 realistically at least in my findings.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

Coverage wise, B26 is much better than B25, and way better than B41. All depends on how the site is configured though. 

 

For example, along some highway coverage here in Missouri, there are places where B25 would drop out completely, but B26 will hold a signal at -105dBm or better along the whole stretch. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know more about these "revised power rules"? Will they allow an increase in power levels outside of the IBEZ? And what effect will they have in IBEZ regions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coverage wise, B26 is much better than B25, and way better than B41. All depends on how the site is configured though.

 

For example, along some highway coverage here in Missouri, there are places where B25 would drop out completely, but B26 will hold a signal at -105dBm or better along the whole stretch.

I don't disagree with that, in fact I've actually experienced B26 at -98 when B25 drops, although I think it would be fair to say that B26 does not perform that well a significant amount of the time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree with that, in fact I've actually experienced B26 at -98 when B25 drops, although I think it would be fair to say that B26 does not perform that well a significant amount of the time.

 

Again, has to do with how each site is configured, downtilt angles and power levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, has to do with how each site is configured, downtilt angles and power levels.

How much will this new FCC Rule enable Sprint to boost power levels for 800 MHz?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coverage wise, B26 is much better than B25, and way better than B41. All depends on how the site is configured though. 

 

For example, along some highway coverage here in Missouri, there are places where B25 would drop out completely, but B26 will hold a signal at -105dBm or better along the whole stretch. 

Theoretically yes, in my experience no. B26 is always about ~5 dBm stronger than B25 and maybe ~3 dBm stronger than B41, yes B41 has better coverage here than B25. I'm hoping with the new rules they can turn the power up on B26 to make 800MHz what it should be. Even at ~120 dBm B26 works better than 3G at ~100dBm, even with the pings being relatively the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congrats to JWMaloney!!!

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Sprint/comments/60y90u/sprint_coverage_map_updated_32117/dfbjfwj/

 

"We've looked at that view and we are incorporating ideas from it into the next major refresh of our coverage map. There are back-end updates required before we can launch new features such as full screen view that we're currently working on first. Bottom line, it's not going to launch as fast as we'd all like, but it's definitely in the works."

 

Bravo!

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theoretically yes, in my experience no. B26 is always about ~5 dBm stronger than B25 and maybe ~3 dBm stronger than B41, yes B41 has better coverage here than B25. I'm hoping with the new rules they can turn the power up on B26 to make 800MHz what it should be. Even at ~120 dBm B26 works better than 3G at ~100dBm, even with the pings being relatively the same.

Something is up in your market then. B26 coverage is about -10 dbm better in San Antonio and Houston and about -12 to -13 dBm better in the boonies in Texas.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congrats to JWMaloney!!!

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Sprint/comments/60y90u/sprint_coverage_map_updated_32117/dfbjfwj/

 

"We've looked at that view and we are incorporating ideas from it into the next major refresh of our coverage map. There are back-end updates required before we can launch new features such as full screen view that we're currently working on first. Bottom line, it's not going to launch as fast as we'd all like, but it's definitely in the works."

 

Bravo!

That's cute. You can literally open my map right now and press F11 to get a "full screen view" if you want to. Not sure what they would need to change on the backend.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theoretically yes, in my experience no. B26 is always about ~5 dBm stronger than B25 and maybe ~3 dBm stronger than B41, yes B41 has better coverage here than B25. I'm hoping with the new rules they can turn the power up on B26 to make 800MHz what it should be. Even at ~120 dBm B26 works better than 3G at ~100dBm, even with the pings being relatively the same.

The rules aren't what's limiting Sprint's B26 coverage, it's Sprint's sites' configurations. I have been to places where B26 is at -120 and 3G is at -106 or only 1x800 is available. Better B26 range is definitely doable, Sprint just hadn't done it in many areas.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rules aren't what's limiting Sprint's B26 coverage, it's Sprint's sites' configurations. I have been to places where B26 is at -120 and 3G is at -106 or only 1x800 is available. Better B26 range is definitely doable, Sprint just hadn't done it in many areas.

CDMA EVDO signal at - 106 RSSI is basically at the edge of service which is pretty much equivalent in terms of badness when converted to RSRP. So not a good example.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CDMA EVDO signal at - 106 RSSI is basically at the edge of service which is pretty much equivalent in terms of badness when converted to RSRP. So not a good example.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

This example was intended to be contrasted with many cases in which B26 is at -120 when 3G is closer to -97 or -98.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This example was intended to be contrasted with many cases in which B26 is at -120 when 3G is closer to -97 or -98.

Still not good. Anywhere around -100 RSSI is pretty much at the edge of CDMA service. A good cdma signal is around - 80s to low 90s.

 

Mid to high 90s RSSI is pretty much equivalent to around - 110s for RSRP which would be an extremely weak LTE signal.

 

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please also make an effort to type oEut proper sentences.

Jesus Christ. Yes. This. I have seen some of the most egregious instances of horrific grammar on this site. And here I thought one of the common threads we all shared was above average intelligence.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And here I thought one of the common threads we all shared was above average intelligence.

 

No.  But all of our women are strong, and all of our men are good looking.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...