Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

To what part of the bill is the employer discount applied to on these unlimited plans?

 

This new plan is non-discountable.

Unlimited My Way has the discount applied to the Data portion only.

Everything Data has the discount applied to the entire price, if I recall correctly....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If no one else gets around to it, I'll show my math later but...

 

Switching to the new $150 UL plan from my ED1500 with 4 lines and new phones would cost me aprox $300 more over the next 2 year cycle. 

 

I used the current pricing on the LG G4 for the comparison and I currently have a 23% discount. Your milage may vary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I notice on the announcement it said that it included sprint global roaming. Does this mean if I switched to this plan I can't use open world. Even though I had to reset my iPhone to get it working and then do it again when I got back to the states, once it was working it was pretty awesome to have access to 3G service while traveling abroad. Thanks

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I notice on the announcement it said that it included sprint global roaming. Does this mean if I switched to this plan I can't use open world. Even though I had to reset my iPhone to get it working and then do it again when I got back to the states, once it was working it was pretty awesome to have access to 3G service while traveling abroad. Thanks

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

My interpretation is that it's enabled by default, whereas when it was initially announced you had to manually add it to your plan.

 

I doubt this would prevent you from removing it to add open world, but I could be wrong... Or they may change open world to be stackable with global roaming (ie not have to remove it first).

 

For what it's worth, I haven't been able to log into Sprint for the last hour. I keep getting bad gateway saying that the proxy received an invalid response from an upstream server. Site upgrades I'm guessing... But you'd think they'd do this at night like most companies...

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My interpretation is that it's enabled by default, whereas when it was initially announced you had to manually add it to your plan.

 

I doubt this would prevent you from removing it to add open world, but I could be wrong... Or they may change open world to be stackable with global roaming (ie not have to remove it first).

 

For what it's worth, I haven't been able to log into Sprint for the last hour. I keep getting bad gateway saying that the proxy received an invalid response from an upstream server. Site upgrades I'm guessing... But you'd think they'd do this at night like most companies...

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

 

Are you using Firefox? I have that problem all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think one thing is going unnoticed with this new pricing.  The price for 1 line is going up again to $75 from $70.

Yep, according to their website, the price for a single unlimited plan is now $75

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My question is how do we really know?

Sprint confirms they are the fastest? Tmo confirms they are the fastest......

Tmo was 38 how was sprints 23 and Tmo last?

Tmo barely edged out sprint in their test and now Tmo is last?

Makes u go hmmmmmmmmmmmm

 

Good for sprint, wouldn't surprise me if vzw and att find Data to suggest they were the fastest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My question is how do we really know?

Sprint confirms they are the fastest? Tmo confirms they are the fastest......

Tmo was 38 how was sprints 23 and Tmo last?

Tmo barely edged out sprint in their test and now Tmo is last?

Makes u go hmmmmmmmmmmmm

 

Good for sprint, wouldn't surprise me if vzw and att find Data to suggest they were the fastest

Who cares. The point is they provided usable service. If they are both claiming, it must mean: one, that it is close and two they are using different measures.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marcelo tweeted Sprint average speed nationwide for the past 14 days is 20MB highest among the 4 carriers and 40 MB in Florida! Hopefully part of these claims are true.

I saw this as well. If it is 100 % true.. it would be very impressive!

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know if this was posted before, but here is the link to the Superbowl DAS results Marcelo tweeted.

http://dasgroupprofessionals.com/?p=587

 

 

 

i think portion speaks louder...   Sprint users passed the least amount data.  compared to the big two, huge difference.  the sprint network should have been faster by 3x

 

 

 

  • AT&T –  5.2 Terabytes
  • Sprint – 1.6 Terabytes
  • T-Mobile – 2.1 Terabytes
  • Verizon –  7 Terabytes
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marcelo tweeted Sprint average speed nationwide for the past 14 days is 20MB highest among the 4 carriers and 40 MB in Florida! Hopefully part of these claims are true.

Probably in areas where only Sprint offers B41. Similarly like how Sprint said they're the fastest nationwide from Nelson studies.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think portion speaks louder... Sprint users passed the least amount data. compared to the big two, huge difference. the sprint network should have been faster by 3x

 

 

 

 

  • AT&T – 5.2 Terabytes[/size]
  • Sprint – 1.6 Terabytes[/size]
  • T-Mobile – 2.1 Terabytes[/size]
  • Verizon – 7 Terabytes[/size]
I dont think it's that simple.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think it's that simple.

 

 

agreed

 

but neither are the speed claims... 

 

 

it would be better leveraged if we knew how many devices connected by each carrier.  (maybe even brown down by cluster... maybe more Sprint users in one portion of the arena?)... along with a breakdown of hourly usage -- over played with the throughput and speed logs from above.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...