Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

That is unfortunate.

 

Part of the whole "simplification" process. This is all the reason I'm still on Framily. There is no option outside of Family Data Share to have a certain amount of data below Unlimited, and frankly, I just don't need much data most of the time.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part of the whole "simplification" process. This is all the reason I'm still on Framily. There is no option outside of Family Data Share to have a certain amount of data below Unlimited, and frankly, I just don't need much data most of the time.

Good point. There should have been a family version of this.

 

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Press release is live

 

http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/sprint-seeks-to-end-consumer-confusion-frustration-with-wireless-industrys-first-ever-all-in-pricing-plan.htm

 

 

 


Streaming video speeds will be limited to 600Kbps at all times, which may impact quality.

 

..."at all times" seems kind of concerning to me. :blink:

 

Does this really mean anything above 240p YouTube videos just don't have enough bandwidth to work?

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2853702?hl=en

 

I don't stream video often at all, but sometimes Disney Jr sure comes in handy...

Edited by joshuam
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint has way too many plans floating around. They need to be eliminated/consolidated. It seems like something new is coming out every few months, and everyone is stuck on some plan that doesn't exist anymore.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6

Well, they aren't going to get rid of old plans that people are still on. Sprint doesn't force people off plans. That would kill them.

 

Sprint doesn't really end plans. They just stop promoting them and focus on the new ones. That way, if someone wants an old plan, they can still get it or keep it. If they didn't do that, they'd be criticized for that too. Taking away plans that people still use and want is not a good idea.

 

It really is the best of both worlds. Why not keep old plans available while promoting and emphasizing the new plans?

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, they aren't going to get rid of old plans that people are still on. Sprint doesn't force people off plans. That would kill them.

 

Sprint doesn't really end plans. They just stop promoting them and focus on the new ones. That way, if someone wants an old plan, they can still get it or keep it. If they didn't do that, they'd be criticized for that too. Taking away plans that people still use and want is not a good idea. 

 

It really is the best of both worlds. Why not keep old plans available while promoting and emphasizing the new plans?

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk 

Well again this plan allin was around since the holidays i believe, but had international roaming, and teather but maybe not.

 

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This moderately concerns me. While I am not a heavy user (I top out at about 3gigs), I do like to be able to watch some videos (watch ESPN, etc) while out and about. I'm not sure if this will be possible limited to that speed.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, they aren't going to get rid of old plans that people are still on. Sprint doesn't force people off plans. That would kill them.

 

Sprint doesn't really end plans. They just stop promoting them and focus on the new ones. That way, if someone wants an old plan, they can still get it or keep it. If they didn't do that, they'd be criticized for that too. Taking away plans that people still use and want is not a good idea. 

 

It really is the best of both worlds. Why not keep old plans available while promoting and emphasizing the new plans?

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk 

It's getting to the point where the old terms are much better, giving me a sense of loyalty credit. For example, my roaming allowance is 300MB, and 800 Minutes.  I don't ever roam, but people get more roaming on older plans than on new plans.  The other issue with the new plans is that video throttling.  Sure, video streaming bogs the network down quite a bit, but with B41 coming live in more places and none of the competition throttling video this hard, I find it hard to justify.  Still, I'm unaffected since I'm on a great legacy plan. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion FWIW, and I’m not advocating using your phone to continuously steaming video on an unlimited data plan, but Sprint needs drop this 600 kpbs streaming restriction quick and in a hurry.  And here’s why.

 

I use my wife as an example of a real world Sprint user.  She is tech savvy but not a techie.  She knows how to use technology and just wants it to work.  What she looks for in technology is price, what you get, and whether it works. 

The price is great on this plan.  What you get is the thought of unlimited.  But if she tries to stream a Youtube video or play a cartoon for the kids at 600 kbps and its grainy, choppy, or having to continuously buffer, then she would be so p*ssed off.  I can hear the questions now:

 

Why are we paying for this unlimited data if we can’t use it?

 

Where did all this money go Sprint paid for all these network improvements if you can’t stream a video?

 

The typical Sprint customer is not a member of this site.  The typical Sprint customer doesn’t know/care about network congestion or data abuse.  The typical Sprint customer will not understand why they have unlimited data, showing LTE as a connection, and can’t stream video.  They will soon no longer be Sprint customers.

Edited by AppleFanBoy
  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion FWIW, and I’m not advocating using your phone to continuously steaming video on an unlimited data plan, but Sprint needs drop this 600 kpbs streaming restriction quick and in a hurry. And here’s why.

 

I use my wife as an example of a real world Sprint user. She is tech savvy but not a techie. She knows how to use technology and just wants it to work. What she looks for in technology is price, what you get, and whether it works.

The price is great on this plan. What you get is the thought of unlimited. But if she tries to stream a Youtube video or play a cartoon for the kids at 600 kbps and its grainy, choppy, or having to continuously buffer, then she would be so p*ssed off. I can hear the questions now:

 

Why are we paying for this unlimited data if we can’t use it?

 

Where did all this money go Sprint paid for all these network improvements if you can’t stream a video?

 

The typical Sprint customer is not a member of this site. The typical Sprint customer doesn’t know/care about network congestion or data abuse. The typical Sprint customer will not understand why they have unlimited data, showing LTE as a connection, and can’t stream video. They will soon no longer be Sprint customers.

Great point. If TMO has a more fragile network with about the same subscribers as Sprint. And sprint has the best technology deployed of any carrier... why can i stream youtube videos, or stream a podcast with them. But about 1/4 of the time doing the same action with sprint makesme want to throw the phone [emoji12]

 

And i get it thats not every ones experience here, but in the real world it seems that way.

 

 

Oh and shared between two phones our monthly useage on any carrier tops out at 14gb typical near 9gb so i dont feel we are data hogs.

 

 

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same here.  Entire family is still on an old ED1500 plan.  Averaging across all 4 lines, we each consume 5-6gb per month.

 

Much of that data is streaming kids video (disney, youtube, etc) when we are out and about or camping where wifi is not available.  If that data was limited to 600 kbps, it would absolutely be painful.

 

I am a bigger fan of throttling back at times of heavy tower loading for ALL users rather than the absolute 600 kbps limit that appears to be in place for these 'new' plans.   What a joke.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion FWIW, and I’m not advocating using your phone to continuously steaming video on an unlimited data plan, but Sprint needs drop this 600 kpbs streaming restriction quick and in a hurry. And here’s why.

 

I use my wife as an example of a real world Sprint user. She is tech savvy but not a techie. She knows how to use technology and just wants it to work. What she looks for in technology is price, what you get, and whether it works.

The price is great on this plan. What you get is the thought of unlimited. But if she tries to stream a Youtube video or play a cartoon for the kids at 600 kbps and its grainy, choppy, or having to continuously buffer, then she would be so p*ssed off. I can hear the questions now:

 

Why are we paying for this unlimited data if we can’t use it?

 

Where did all this money go Sprint paid for all these network improvements if you can’t stream a video?

 

The typical Sprint customer is not a member of this site. The typical Sprint customer doesn’t know/care about network congestion or data abuse. The typical Sprint customer will not understand why they have unlimited data, showing LTE as a connection, and can’t stream video. They will soon no longer be Sprint customers.

I fully agree. Sprint should just drop that 600kbps for video. Besides the way that most people are now they will be looking for wifi anyways. I think the plan is nice but if sprint wants clean up their image and not being named the trash carrier that 600kbps has to go. People only judge by what they see.

 

These new plans are enticing but when reading the terms I just can't let go of my legacy plan at all even if it is $10 more.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's getting to the point where the old terms are much better, giving me a sense of loyalty credit. For example, my roaming allowance is 300MB, and 800 Minutes. I don't ever roam, but people get more roaming on older plans than on new plans. The other issue with the new plans is that video throttling. Sure, video streaming bogs the network down quite a bit, but with B41 coming live in more places and none of the competition throttling video this hard, I find it hard to justify. Still, I'm unaffected since I'm on a great legacy plan.

Exactly. That's why you're probably glad they don't get rid of old plans, right?

 

Using Tapatalk on Nexus 6

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. That's why you're probably glad they don't get rid of old plans, right?

 

Using Tapatalk on Nexus 6

 

I pay $45 for Unlimited on Framily. I'm riding it as long as the ship will sail. I could in theory pay $65 for what new customers are paying $80 for. :rasp:

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

600kbps streaming is not going to be popular. It is basically saying it's an unlimited plan without streaming.

My fear with it is new customers. People who have been considering Sprint for awhile and want to make the jump to Sprint unlimited because they can't currently stream anything. Sales people are not going to tell them about streaming limitations. They are just going to be unhappy when it doesn't work or work well. And when they find out after the fact why, it's going to hurt Sprint's image with these new customers. They will feel duped.

600kbps is too low. But if Sprint has to set it to such a Draconian level, it really illustrates what wide open unlimited is doing to its network.  Unlimited is officially on life support.

Using Tapatalk on Nexus 6

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dropping the 600kbs *possible* throttle would be idiotic. However sprint could word it quite a bit better.

 

Something more like:

"At Sprint we are reserving the right to potentially limit the ability to stream video to <whatever resolution the throttle is 'rated'> on our new value oriented plans. This right is reserved to keep our newly renovated network in peak performance for all our users and should not be utilized in everyday scenarios."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. That's why you're probably glad they don't get rid of old plans, right?

 

Using Tapatalk on Nexus 6

Do you think when Sprint stops offering unlimited data, that legacy plans will also be affected?  That's my concern.  I have a feeling that Sprint will follow AT&T's stance.  Try to get customers off unlimited, but still offer it on upgrades for long-term customers that are grandfathered in.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

600kbps streaming is not going to be popular. It is basically saying it's an unlimited plan without streaming.

 

My fear with it is new customers. People who have been considering Sprint for awhile and want to make the jump to Sprint unlimited because they can't currently stream anything. Sales people are not going to tell them about streaming limitations. They are just going to be unhappy when it doesn't work or work well. And when they find out after the fact why, it's going to hurt Sprint's image with these new customers. They will feel duped.

 

600kbps is too low. But if Sprint has to set it to such a Draconian level, it really illustrates what wide open unlimited is doing to its network. Unlimited is officially on life support.

 

Using Tapatalk on Nexus 6

Except its not an issue yet on tmo, nor the other networks. I dont think every - heck even 20% of sprint users consume more than 7gb a month.

 

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think when Sprint stops offering unlimited data, that legacy plans will also be affected?  That's my concern.  I have a feeling that Sprint will follow AT&T's stance.  Try to get customers off unlimited, but still offer it on upgrades for long-term customers that are grandfathered in.

 

That could very well happen.  Nothing like that has ever happened at Sprint before to my knowledge.  So it would be unprecedented.  But hey, it's possible.  Marcelo is going to take Sprint to #1 or #2 in performance.  And he isn't going to allow streamers, or at least new customer streamers, to stop them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That could very well happen. Nothing like that has ever happened at Sprint before to my knowledge. So it would be unprecedented. But hey, it's possible. Marcelo is going to take Sprint to #1 or #2 in performance. And he isn't going to allow streamers, or at least new customer streamers, to stop them.

Well if it can't handle streaming

 

- better change the new add

 

- not going to be number 2 or 1

 

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if it can't handle streaming

 

- better change the new add

 

- not going to be number 2 or 1

 

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

 

What do you mean?  Testing by RootMetrics and OOKLA do not check streaming speeds, just download/upload speeds.  Sprint could be ranked #1 in performance and have 600kbps streaming limitations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you mean? Testing by RootMetrics and OOKLA do not check streaming speeds, just download/upload speeds. Sprint could be ranked #1 in performance and have 600kbps streaming limitations.

Lol okay i missed that key verbiage....

 

Have a nice day

 

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's getting to the point where the old terms are much better, giving me a sense of loyalty credit.

 

The other issue with the new plans is that video throttling.  Sure, video streaming bogs the network down quite a bit, but with B41 coming live in more places and none of the competition throttling video this hard, I find it hard to justify.  Still, I'm unaffected since I'm on a great legacy plan. 

 

I wouldn't be so quick to assume that the legacy plans are unaffected.

 

And even if legacy plans aren't effected today, I wouldn't be quick to assume that will continue indefinitely.

 

Previous "network load reduction" changes have sometimes hit legacy plans (such as the double compressing of images).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...