Jump to content

Sprint and NTelos Announce Extension of Strategic Alliance

marioc21

By marioc21
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

marioc21 Member Level: eHRPD

marioc21

Posted
Posted

Well, finally some news.  Looks like Sprint and NTelos finally agreed on a new deal.  The new extension will go through 2022.  

 

Highlights:

 

  • nTelos remains exclusive provider to Sprint in current territory.
  • Sprint customers gain access to nTelos LTE network.
  • nTelos will gain access to Sprint 800, 1900 & 2500 spectrum.
  • nTelos will continue buildout of its 4g network throughout its territory according to Sprint's Network modernization program.
  • nTelos says the network improvements will be substantially complete by May 2017

 

A conference call will be held at 8am ET.

 

Sprint's Press Release:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/sprint-ntelos-extend-strategic-network-100100325.html

 

nTelos' Press Release:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ntelos-holdings-corp-host-conference-100200833.html

 

Call is here: http://ir.ntelos.com/CorporateProfile.aspx?iid=4110676

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites
marioc21 Member Level: eHRPD

marioc21

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Other items:

 

nTelos will gain access to Sprint's device and equipment relationships.  Let's them offer a greater range of devices.

nTelos will buildout on top of its existing equipment.  Not rip and replace.

nTelos will use equipment from shared network vendors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

Wow, it will take them 3 years. Surprised by that.

3 years to complete the additional LTE bands, like Band 26 and 41. That doesn't surprise me. nTelos is a rather small company. However, nTelos' existing LTE network should open up to Sprint customers soon.

 

We will likely see their B26/B41 additions start coming online in 10-12 months. And it will steadily progress to 2017.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

Good news. I wonder how long before those nTelos sites that are already live with LTE are accessible to Sprint customers...

You would think it would be imminent. Like less than 30 days. They likely have already worker out the physical network details. It's probably why there is a Sprint LTE Sensorly track NW of Charleston WV. I'm hoping for our Sprint customers in this region it's soon!

 

:fingers:

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Josh Member Level: 3G EVDO

Josh

Posted
Posted

You would think it would be imminent. Like less than 30 days. They likely have already worker out the physical network details. It's probably why there is a Sprint LTE Sensorly track NW of Charleston WV. I'm hoping for our Sprint customers in this region it's soon!

 

:fingers:

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

2 questions:

 

First, what frequencies are nTelos using for their LTE? I know that they have their own spectrum & I thought I had read that they were using 700MHz for LTE. From what I am reading here, is sprint doing a spectrum sharing deal with this too?

 

Secondly, if nTelos does not provide the coverage or reliability that sprint expects, could sprint overbuild in the area or buy out nTelos in the future? I have never had a good experience anywhere in WV in cities or along major highways, so I don't really trust them to do better now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JeffDTD Member Level: 4G WiMax

JeffDTD

Posted
Posted

So who else is left? Cspire?

A cspire relationship that brings sprint customers cspire managed LTE would corode cspire's competetive advantage in its home turf as cspire struggles to keep up with the big 2 and instead finds itself competing with the little 2 more and more. Cspire has only slightly more LTE deployed in its mainstay, MS, than Sprint. Perhaps revenue from sprint and the rural carrier alliance helps pay for a full PCS buildout? They initially budgeted for a 700mhz buildout. The biggest complaint from cspire customers continues to concern their legacy data speeds which is **ding ding ding** a friendly coincidence as they are only competing based on the availability of unlimited, not price.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Flompholph Member Level: 4G WiMax

Flompholph

Posted
Posted

2 questions:

First, what frequencies are nTelos using for their LTE? I know that they have their own spectrum & I thought I had read that they were using 700MHz for LTE. From what I am reading here, is sprint doing a spectrum sharing deal with this too?

Secondly, if nTelos does not provide the coverage or reliability that sprint expects, could sprint overbuild in the area or buy out nTelos in the future? I have never had a good experience anywhere in WV in cities or along major highways, so I don't really trust them to do better now.

http://ir.ntelos.com/ShowFile.aspx?KeyFile=23743792&Format=HTML&Output=HTML

Not sure all of ntelos spectrum but it looks shared 800/1900/2500 ntelos and sprint spectrum. Not sure how much added spectrum ntelos will add.

 

Sprint can build towers but they have to ask ntelos to build the tower first. If ntelos says no sprint can build a tower. Ntelos also has the build the network in a reasonable time. Not sure what is a reasonable time means though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
uecker87 Member Level: eHRPD

uecker87

Posted
Posted

Now we wait for USCC and other regionals like C-Spire... :)

 

This --- I know USCC has been deploying 850 LTE over their 700 LTE sites for iPhone support, so the compatibility is there.  I would absolutely love to hear an announcement about the LTE deal between these two.  It would vastly improve the coverage in my area. 

 

Southern Wisconsin is pretty much a USCC stronghold too, so I doubt USCC customers would use any of Sprint's bandwidth here.  Would be a win, win situation for me. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Paynefanbro
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • schmidtj
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By schmidtj · Posted

      5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • RedSpark
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By RedSpark · Posted

      Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • dkyeager
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • RedSpark
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By RedSpark · Posted

      Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...