Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, finally some news.  Looks like Sprint and NTelos finally agreed on a new deal.  The new extension will go through 2022.  

 

Highlights:

 

  • nTelos remains exclusive provider to Sprint in current territory.
  • Sprint customers gain access to nTelos LTE network.
  • nTelos will gain access to Sprint 800, 1900 & 2500 spectrum.
  • nTelos will continue buildout of its 4g network throughout its territory according to Sprint's Network modernization program.
  • nTelos says the network improvements will be substantially complete by May 2017

 

A conference call will be held at 8am ET.

 

Sprint's Press Release:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/sprint-ntelos-extend-strategic-network-100100325.html

 

nTelos' Press Release:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ntelos-holdings-corp-host-conference-100200833.html

 

Call is here: http://ir.ntelos.com/CorporateProfile.aspx?iid=4110676

  • Like 11
Posted

The conference call is going on now.  Will post any additional information.

  • Like 2
Posted

Other items:

 

nTelos will gain access to Sprint's device and equipment relationships.  Let's them offer a greater range of devices.

nTelos will buildout on top of its existing equipment.  Not rip and replace.

nTelos will use equipment from shared network vendors.

Posted

Good news. I wonder how long before those nTelos sites that are already live with LTE are accessible to Sprint customers...

Posted

Wow, it will take them 3 years. Surprised by that.

3 years to complete the additional LTE bands, like Band 26 and 41. That doesn't surprise me. nTelos is a rather small company. However, nTelos' existing LTE network should open up to Sprint customers soon.

 

We will likely see their B26/B41 additions start coming online in 10-12 months. And it will steadily progress to 2017.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Posted

Good news. I wonder how long before those nTelos sites that are already live with LTE are accessible to Sprint customers...

You would think it would be imminent. Like less than 30 days. They likely have already worker out the physical network details. It's probably why there is a Sprint LTE Sensorly track NW of Charleston WV. I'm hoping for our Sprint customers in this region it's soon!

 

:fingers:

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Posted

You would think it would be imminent. Like less than 30 days. They likely have already worker out the physical network details. It's probably why there is a Sprint LTE Sensorly track NW of Charleston WV. I'm hoping for our Sprint customers in this region it's soon!

 

:fingers:

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

2 questions:

 

First, what frequencies are nTelos using for their LTE? I know that they have their own spectrum & I thought I had read that they were using 700MHz for LTE. From what I am reading here, is sprint doing a spectrum sharing deal with this too?

 

Secondly, if nTelos does not provide the coverage or reliability that sprint expects, could sprint overbuild in the area or buy out nTelos in the future? I have never had a good experience anywhere in WV in cities or along major highways, so I don't really trust them to do better now.

Posted

So who else is left? Cspire?

A cspire relationship that brings sprint customers cspire managed LTE would corode cspire's competetive advantage in its home turf as cspire struggles to keep up with the big 2 and instead finds itself competing with the little 2 more and more. Cspire has only slightly more LTE deployed in its mainstay, MS, than Sprint. Perhaps revenue from sprint and the rural carrier alliance helps pay for a full PCS buildout? They initially budgeted for a 700mhz buildout. The biggest complaint from cspire customers continues to concern their legacy data speeds which is **ding ding ding** a friendly coincidence as they are only competing based on the availability of unlimited, not price.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Posted

2 questions:

First, what frequencies are nTelos using for their LTE? I know that they have their own spectrum & I thought I had read that they were using 700MHz for LTE. From what I am reading here, is sprint doing a spectrum sharing deal with this too?

Secondly, if nTelos does not provide the coverage or reliability that sprint expects, could sprint overbuild in the area or buy out nTelos in the future? I have never had a good experience anywhere in WV in cities or along major highways, so I don't really trust them to do better now.

http://ir.ntelos.com/ShowFile.aspx?KeyFile=23743792&Format=HTML&Output=HTML

Not sure all of ntelos spectrum but it looks shared 800/1900/2500 ntelos and sprint spectrum. Not sure how much added spectrum ntelos will add.

 

Sprint can build towers but they have to ask ntelos to build the tower first. If ntelos says no sprint can build a tower. Ntelos also has the build the network in a reasonable time. Not sure what is a reasonable time means though.

Posted

Now we wait for USCC and other regionals like C-Spire... :)

 

This --- I know USCC has been deploying 850 LTE over their 700 LTE sites for iPhone support, so the compatibility is there.  I would absolutely love to hear an announcement about the LTE deal between these two.  It would vastly improve the coverage in my area. 

 

Southern Wisconsin is pretty much a USCC stronghold too, so I doubt USCC customers would use any of Sprint's bandwidth here.  Would be a win, win situation for me. :D

Posted

Yeah! But, cautious optimism being exercised here. Lots of "ifs" involved.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

Posted

nTelos will use equipment from shared network vendors.

Shared? does nTelos use vendors that Sprint does not?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was it like only 1.2MB?  I had a tiny one last night but no date change as I was already on November here.
    • Nov 1 play system system update.
    • A new apartment building in my neighborhood is getting a 4G/5G DAS installed. No idea if it's going to be carrier agnostic or if it's going to be just for one carrier. The antennas they are using cover the full range of spectrum from 600MHz-4.9GHz so no telling by equipment alone. I noticed a ton of Cat6E ethernet being run in the garage a couple of days back and then I saw a guy running the ethernet through the ceiling yesterday and didn't think to ask what for until I noticed this antenna this morning mounted on a wall outside near the ramp but with nothing connected to it at the moment.     The garage attendant told me that the phones that are provided to them by the parking management company are on Verizon and they're the only carrier without coverage down there so the building management told them that they're "installing something to fix it". So as far as I know, this will work on Verizon but I'm curious to see who else will get a boost too. — — — — — Without exaggerating, I have mapped a new at least one new small cell on my way to work every day this week. I don't know who the regional network managers for NYC and Boston are, but other cities need to take a page from their book about small cell buildouts. And it's not just upgrades of existing small cells, it's new ones too. Not to mention pings near 10ms on all of them.
    • Yep, 562.51MB December 1 sec patch just found here tonight as well. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...