Jump to content

Sprint to join Rural Operators Roaming Hub (CCA and RRPP thread)


marioc21

Recommended Posts

I would love LTE roaming on USCC in New Hampshire this summer!

 

Yeah I'm waiting for that day...  LTE roaming here in Wisconsin would pretty much make it so there is LTE everywhere.  Just hoping they do something with the roaming data caps for everyone in the hub. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love LTE roaming on USCC in New Hampshire this summer!

You stole the words out of my mouth.. I hate that Sprint has no coverage (not only LTE.. they just don't have any sites at all) north of Concord except along 93 and in downtown Laconia, and has no plans to expand. I can't believe the complete lack if coverage around Winnipesaukee while the Big Two and USCC have it fully blanketed.

 

I don't blame Sprint for not wanting to pay to expand into a seasonal vacation area that isn't likely to significantly boost their subscriber base, but the limited 1X we can access certainly doesn't convince anyone to not consider alternatives. Providing a reasonable roaming option would be fantastic. There are plenty of Sprint customers from MA and Southern NH that are up there regularly.

 

I don't need unlimited 10mb/s, just provide something usable for light internet use and not sucking my battery down while it works its tail off looking for signal that isn't there.

 

-Mike

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick Question, in future when roaming on lte would u still have the spark icon. Considering it can't differentiate between sprint bands now

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk

I believe Android has a separate icon call out for Roaming LTE. Unless Sprint saves the Spark icon over that too, you probably will know when you're LTE roaming. But the best way would be to watch Signal Check Pro.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think that Sprint would want to differentiate Native LTE with roaming LTE in hopes that a customer would be less inclined to go batshit crazy pulling heavy roaming data. I tend to be pretty light with use whenever I notice the roaming triangle on my phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's treated native, then I don't expect any roaming indicators.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think that Sprint would want to differentiate Native LTE with roaming LTE in hopes that a customer would be less inclined to go batshit crazy pulling heavy roaming data. I tend to be pretty light with use whenever I notice the roaming triangle on my phone.

Yes but the problem with that is that it still scares customers. My mom to this day will not make a call while roaming no matter how much I tell her it won't effect her Bill unless she goes crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but the problem with that is that it still scares customers. My mom to this day will not make a call while roaming no matter how much I tell her it won't effect her Bill unless she goes crazy.

 

My eyes get stuck up in the air when someone on Verizon tells me they're afraid of being charged for roaming, and I tell them a million times that Verizon's domestic roaming is all you can eat with no added cost. 

 

I can't imagine how non-techie Sprint users must feel. Most of the time I'll see roaming turned off on their phones. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I can't imagine how non-techie Sprint users must feel. Most of the time I'll see roaming turned off on their phones. 

 

It saves battery life quite lot if roaming is disabled on a Sprint phone.

Edited by JoeJoeJoe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It saves battery life quite lot if roaming is disabled on a Sprint phone.

Yeah back before all the NV 3G upgrades were complete I'd disable it so I didn't flip back and forth between native and roaming constantly. Now since I had to turn it on last when I left native coverage, I've just left it on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any new news of when things will take off for this? or if they are planning some sort of announcement in the future for when the companys will coincide? i travel back home to south dakota often where James Valley Communications is. it would be great to use my phone there without having to worry about data roaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any new news of when things will take off for this? or if they are planning some sort of announcement in the future for when the companys will coincide? i travel back home to south dakota often where James Valley Communications is. it would be great to use my phone there without having to worry about data roaming.

2025

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

anyone know a real timeframe for this yet. or has it been pretty quiet?

 

Sprint plans to add 700mhz to select smartphones starting next year.  We will probably learn more soon but I won't be surprised if we get more info late this year or early next year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's always next year with sprint. They need to stop with their obsession with T-Mobile and get on this or expand their network. Just seems like they take forever to get stuff done

 

It was only announced a month ago.... 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTEiRA participants cannot participate in the Sprint program due to exclusivity clauses in the deal. And C Spire Wireless does not offer/sell service in Georgia. It does, however, sell and operate service in Memphis, Mobile, and Pensacola.

What if a carrier is listed as being a member of LTEiRA but doesn't actually have any sort of LTE (Just 1x and EVDO) on their network? And uses their own (AWS) spectrum + Sprint's PCS stuff? And if they already have a full native bilateral roaming agreement with Sprint? (Talking specifically about Carolina West.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if a carrier is listed as being a member of LTEiRA but doesn't actually have any sort of LTE (Just 1x and EVDO) on their network? And uses their own (AWS) spectrum + Sprint's PCS stuff? And if they already have a full native bilateral roaming agreement with Sprint? (Talking specifically about Carolina West.)

Still no. While LTEiRA doesn't prevent roaming deals, it definitely prevents SRA-style deals. That's why Pioneer Telephone left the SRA for LTEiRA not too long ago.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTEiRA participants cannot participate in the Sprint program due to exclusivity clauses in the deal.

 

Cough, VZW Trojan horse, cough...

 

AJ

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

New news on this topic: http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/sprint-to-expand-4g-lte-roaming-through-12-new-agreements-with-carriers-covering-a-population-of-over-34-million.htm?view_id=10517

 

Unfortunately, no news about USCC LTE roaming...  Oh well...  Glad to see there is working being done with smaller carriers though.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...