Jump to content

Sprint to join Rural Operators Roaming Hub (CCA and RRPP thread)


marioc21

Recommended Posts

I would love LTE roaming on USCC in New Hampshire this summer!

 

Yeah I'm waiting for that day...  LTE roaming here in Wisconsin would pretty much make it so there is LTE everywhere.  Just hoping they do something with the roaming data caps for everyone in the hub. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love LTE roaming on USCC in New Hampshire this summer!

You stole the words out of my mouth.. I hate that Sprint has no coverage (not only LTE.. they just don't have any sites at all) north of Concord except along 93 and in downtown Laconia, and has no plans to expand. I can't believe the complete lack if coverage around Winnipesaukee while the Big Two and USCC have it fully blanketed.

 

I don't blame Sprint for not wanting to pay to expand into a seasonal vacation area that isn't likely to significantly boost their subscriber base, but the limited 1X we can access certainly doesn't convince anyone to not consider alternatives. Providing a reasonable roaming option would be fantastic. There are plenty of Sprint customers from MA and Southern NH that are up there regularly.

 

I don't need unlimited 10mb/s, just provide something usable for light internet use and not sucking my battery down while it works its tail off looking for signal that isn't there.

 

-Mike

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick Question, in future when roaming on lte would u still have the spark icon. Considering it can't differentiate between sprint bands now

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk

I believe Android has a separate icon call out for Roaming LTE. Unless Sprint saves the Spark icon over that too, you probably will know when you're LTE roaming. But the best way would be to watch Signal Check Pro.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think that Sprint would want to differentiate Native LTE with roaming LTE in hopes that a customer would be less inclined to go batshit crazy pulling heavy roaming data. I tend to be pretty light with use whenever I notice the roaming triangle on my phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's treated native, then I don't expect any roaming indicators.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think that Sprint would want to differentiate Native LTE with roaming LTE in hopes that a customer would be less inclined to go batshit crazy pulling heavy roaming data. I tend to be pretty light with use whenever I notice the roaming triangle on my phone.

Yes but the problem with that is that it still scares customers. My mom to this day will not make a call while roaming no matter how much I tell her it won't effect her Bill unless she goes crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but the problem with that is that it still scares customers. My mom to this day will not make a call while roaming no matter how much I tell her it won't effect her Bill unless she goes crazy.

 

My eyes get stuck up in the air when someone on Verizon tells me they're afraid of being charged for roaming, and I tell them a million times that Verizon's domestic roaming is all you can eat with no added cost. 

 

I can't imagine how non-techie Sprint users must feel. Most of the time I'll see roaming turned off on their phones. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I can't imagine how non-techie Sprint users must feel. Most of the time I'll see roaming turned off on their phones. 

 

It saves battery life quite lot if roaming is disabled on a Sprint phone.

Edited by JoeJoeJoe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It saves battery life quite lot if roaming is disabled on a Sprint phone.

Yeah back before all the NV 3G upgrades were complete I'd disable it so I didn't flip back and forth between native and roaming constantly. Now since I had to turn it on last when I left native coverage, I've just left it on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any new news of when things will take off for this? or if they are planning some sort of announcement in the future for when the companys will coincide? i travel back home to south dakota often where James Valley Communications is. it would be great to use my phone there without having to worry about data roaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any new news of when things will take off for this? or if they are planning some sort of announcement in the future for when the companys will coincide? i travel back home to south dakota often where James Valley Communications is. it would be great to use my phone there without having to worry about data roaming.

2025

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

anyone know a real timeframe for this yet. or has it been pretty quiet?

 

Sprint plans to add 700mhz to select smartphones starting next year.  We will probably learn more soon but I won't be surprised if we get more info late this year or early next year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's always next year with sprint. They need to stop with their obsession with T-Mobile and get on this or expand their network. Just seems like they take forever to get stuff done

 

It was only announced a month ago.... 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTEiRA participants cannot participate in the Sprint program due to exclusivity clauses in the deal. And C Spire Wireless does not offer/sell service in Georgia. It does, however, sell and operate service in Memphis, Mobile, and Pensacola.

What if a carrier is listed as being a member of LTEiRA but doesn't actually have any sort of LTE (Just 1x and EVDO) on their network? And uses their own (AWS) spectrum + Sprint's PCS stuff? And if they already have a full native bilateral roaming agreement with Sprint? (Talking specifically about Carolina West.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if a carrier is listed as being a member of LTEiRA but doesn't actually have any sort of LTE (Just 1x and EVDO) on their network? And uses their own (AWS) spectrum + Sprint's PCS stuff? And if they already have a full native bilateral roaming agreement with Sprint? (Talking specifically about Carolina West.)

Still no. While LTEiRA doesn't prevent roaming deals, it definitely prevents SRA-style deals. That's why Pioneer Telephone left the SRA for LTEiRA not too long ago.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTEiRA participants cannot participate in the Sprint program due to exclusivity clauses in the deal.

 

Cough, VZW Trojan horse, cough...

 

AJ

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

New news on this topic: http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/sprint-to-expand-4g-lte-roaming-through-12-new-agreements-with-carriers-covering-a-population-of-over-34-million.htm?view_id=10517

 

Unfortunately, no news about USCC LTE roaming...  Oh well...  Glad to see there is working being done with smaller carriers though.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...