Jump to content

Sprint To Trial Fixed Wireless Service With Dish


marioc21

Recommended Posts

It's going to be 81° here this weekend. I hope these winter months prove to be a boon for us here in the south for continued rollouts.

 

I didn't mean to say that everywhere in the US will be halted for B41 LTE deployment.  Certainly southern states are not going to be affected by snow or in-climate weather and will continue with B41 LTE deployment.  But I still think its too aggressive for every single Clearwire site to be upgraded to B41 LTE by end of Spring 2014.  I expect some delays as Softbank/Sprint begin shifting resources and funding for new fires that may arise.

 

Perfect example is this eCSFB issue which now turns out to be a high priority and has caused Sprint to shift focus on upgrading more 1x/3G on LTE sites instead of continuing to build out more LTE in these markets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you already don't have service with 1900mhz LTE this will do you no good either.If the were to go with 800mhz LTE now your cooking with peanut oil.

Au contraire. Fixed wireless is a much different animal. Antenna gain and uplink power can be greatly increased. Comparison to mobile handset reception is spurious.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Au contraire. Fixed wireless is a much different animal. Antenna gain and uplink power can be greatly increased. Comparison to mobile handset reception is spurious.

 

AJ

Understood I my case I'm already running a 1900mhz grid antenna with 21dbi gain, and cyfre amp and come spring when leave's come on I loss service.That's with a u770 usb device. Everything but the airlink from tower to my antenna is wired. Verizon will not even come to my house to set me up with their fixed system and that's 700mhz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phase 2 complete by Spring? The last I heard, Phase 2 was to be complete by December 2014.

 

Robert

?

 

We taking the green and pink pins here? Maybe I'm confused. I though the plan was to have the current WiMax overlay done by Spring. Or maybe I need to go reread. Been a crazy couple of weeks.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint and Dish have only told us they are trialing fixed service in Corpus Christi, TX, I make no assumptions about this ever being a nationwide offering.  Making that assumption and then immediately assuming or wondering if Sprint can meet that goal is presumptuous. 

 

If I were to guess, Sprint is using this little exercise to trial the cooperative, working relationship that can be established with Dish as much as it is trialing the actual deployment and customer experience.  Delivering fixed wireless access isn't nearly as challenging as mobile access, so its silly to assume they are doing this "to see if it works".  Rather, Ergen-network has a reputation for being solely self interested and dumping/killing anything which doesn't meet his expected profit margins, no matter what contractual obligations or promises he has made.   If Dish can conduct itself properly through the exercise, Sprint gains confidence that it won't get stiffed in a network hosting deal.  Further, by creating an ally in Dish and growing a relationship, Sprint *may* avoid ending up having to battle Ergen for Tmo, should that ever happen.  Smart move, Sprint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Understood I my case I'm already running a 1900mhz grid antenna with 21dbi gain, and cyfre amp and come spring when leave's come on I loss service.That's with a u770 usb device. Everything but the airlink from tower to my antenna is wired. Verizon will not even come to my house to set me up with their fixed system and that's 700mhz.

 

That is an interesting setup you have there.  But do understand that you are talking about a fixed installation on a mobile wireless network.  That is different from a fixed installation on a fixed wireless network.  The link budgets are calculated differently.  And fixed wireless, like wired broadband, may not be available at some addresses.  However, that does not indicate that if no mobile LTE 1900 is usable, then no fixed TD-LTE 2600 will be usable at that location.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NV 1.0 is nearing completion. Whatever. This is just a negative platitude. If you're here just to troll, you will lose your privelleges. It's getting to the point that every one of your posts is a Sprint bash. That would make you a troll.

 

If you don't like Sprint, why do you hang out in Sprint forums? We can help correct your course if you're lost.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

This is a typical Gary Forsee move.  Keep dabbing into everything at the same time but never finish anything.

 

Pretty much laid it out solid.I hate it when people talk bad about sprint. If you hate them so much, sell your device and pay the ETF. End of story.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is an interesting setup you have there.  But do understand that you are talking about a fixed installation on a mobile wireless network.  That is different from a fixed installation on a fixed wireless network.  The link budgets are calculated differently.  And fixed wireless, like wired broadband, may not be available at some addresses.  However, that does not indicate that if no mobile LTE 1900 is usable, then no fixed TD-LTE 2600 will be usable at that location.

 

AJ

True

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been a firm believer that EBS/BRS are better suited to fixed broadband. In fact I had Sprint broadband on that frequency in the early 2000's. Now granted Sprint had only one fixed broadband antenna in my area to cover 100,000 people. But it was OK, better than DSL which was non-existant at the time and cable which wanted $10,000 to cross a 5 lane highway and cover our 5 story building.

 

and BTW I'm all for the T-Mobile/Sprint combo as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else curious if the fcc will look at this and think that they cant allow a sprint, tmobile, dish merger and may use this as a reason to block the merger? Edit-i am referring to the supposed sprint buyout of tmobile. Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

I would have no problem whatever to see a Dish/Sprint joint venture taking advantage of EBS/BRS for fixed broadband/OTT video/Internet radio, telematics, etc. Let Sprint/T-Mobile use the more traditional mobile frequencies for mobile broadband.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope they're planning to utilize 8x8 MIMO for this. That could offer up to 300 Mbps for each 20 MHz carrier per sector.

Sprint mention 150 Mbps with Sprint Spark.  Not sure how you double that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint mention 150 Mbps with Sprint Spark. Not sure how you double that.

More MIMO antennas. Not currently possible in something as small as a smartphone. But more easily done in fixed wireless equipment.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint mention 150 Mbps with Sprint Spark. Not sure how you double that.

2x2 MIMO (the current handset limitation) can do around 80mbps, 4x4 MIMO (probably in tablets soon) can do roughly double, and then 8x8 (really reasonable only in fixed modems) should be able to double it again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am excited to hear of all of these deals and talks about Sprint partnering and providing access to different providers. These are the kinds of headlines that can keep Sprint in the light and hopefully represent a strong and innovative footprint in the industry.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be surprised if it is unlimited though. With the number of ISP's that have gone with monthly caps, I would be surprised if they allowed an all you can eat approach for a wireless solution. But it should be far more generous than Verizon LTE ISP.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

Like 100G soft cap clear did before?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have no problem whatever to see a Dish/Sprint joint venture taking advantage of EBS/BRS for fixed broadband/OTT video/Internet radio, telematics, etc. Let Sprint/T-Mobile use the more traditional mobile frequencies for mobile broadband.

 

You mean un-do the clear acquire?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly are Dish's spectrum holdings

 

Not entirely sure how correct I am but I think they have 6MHz of unpaired spectrum, 700MHz E block 722-728 MHz across something like 95% of markets and 40 MHz of AWS 4 spectrum, paired 2000-2020MHz and 2180-2200MHz. To be honest I got a little lost over exactly how much of it they could use due to possible interference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...