Jump to content

Shentel / Sprint LTE - (was ntelos - West & N&W Virginia)


marioc21

Recommended Posts

This is indeed great news, but, yeah, the timing will be everything. Where's the best place to put our ear to the ground for updates, I wonder.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

. . . any Sprint LTE device will work once they are given access.

"once they are given access" being the key phrase here. I hope it doesn't take long!!

 

Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey there guys, I heard the good news today, so I decided to confirm a few facts for a friend on nTelos. I've attached the photo, but it seems that to use 4G you'll need to 1) Get a SIM card from the store and 2) Change your plan to the nControl plan. Also, I saw nTelos is using Band 2 for it's deployment while Sprint devices use Band 25. It looks like phones with either band can access both networks given that the current batch of nTelos/Sprint 4G phones are almost exclusively Band 25, while the nTelos network is actually Band 2.

 

Xc2trR5.png?1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey there guys, I heard the good news today, so I decided to confirm a few facts for a friend on nTelos. I've attached the photo, but it seems that to use 4G you'll need to 1) Get a SIM card from the store and 2) Change your plan to the nControl plan. Also, I saw nTelos is using Band 2 for it's deployment while Sprint devices use Band 25. It looks like phones with either band can access both networks given that the current batch of nTelos/Sprint 4G phones are almost exclusively Band 25, while the nTelos network is actually Band 2.

 

 

 

You use nTelos?

 

Sprint devices will be able to use any Band 2 LTE that has been deployed since Band 2 is incorporated in Band 25. Only a network update will be needed, no changes on devices or swaps in SIM cards. 

 

For nTelso, I don't know. But I would assume if you use nTelos, you would already have access to any LTE deployed. Not sure why a SIM swap or plan change would be required. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You use nTelos?

 

Sprint devices will be able to use any Band 2 LTE that has been deployed since Band 2 is incorporated in Band 25. Only a network update will be needed, no changes on devices or swaps in SIM cards. 

 

For nTelso, I don't know. But I would assume if you use nTelos, you would already have access to any LTE deployed. Not sure why a SIM swap or plan change would be required. 

Right, I wasn't saying there were need to be a swap on the SIM or change, I was just putting the dots together regarding the interoperability :) . I have a friend with nTelos whose phone/network I have access to very often, so that's why I wanted to check if it was ready to connect to LTE as some smaller carrier would ship the CDMA phones w/o a SIM card before their LTE deployment simply because it wasn't necessary. It looks like you will need to go out and get a SIM from the store or have it activated, and thus (according to the sales rep), change your plan to be "4G compatible"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even the iphone 5s/c supports band 2 according to apples website, Honestly I would worry about this when it happens. We all know that ntelos drags there feet. I am shocked that sprint actually signed a new contract with them, I can only figure that they got a really good deal. Only because ntelos would lose so much money if they lost this contract.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even the iphone 5s/c supports band 2 according to apples website, Honestly I would worry about this when it happens. We all know that ntelos drags there feet. I am shocked that sprint actually signed a new contract with them, I can only figure that they got a really good deal. Only because ntelos would lose so much money if they lost this contract.

I think Sprint just doesn't want the work involved in building a network here. It's easier to threaten little nTelos into speeding things up and allow us to use their network.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

nTelos is probably going to drag their feet letting Sprint users on their LTE network. :-(

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

I doubt it. They need to monetize that new LTE network. They only get paid by Sprint for usage on it.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt it. They need to monetize that new LTE network. They only get paid by Sprint for usage on it.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

It's also a reciprocal LTE roaming deal. Imagine Sprint wouldn't let nTelos customers roam on 4g until ntelos let sprint customers do so.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's sad it's taken this long to even hear something about LTE in our area. As soon as I leave the nTelos markets I have LTE service. Almost everywhere I go... My parents live in rural Michigan and I had LTE there. I'm in Smokey Mountains and I have LTE service here. Crazy....

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This waiting game is killing me. If they could just say something else about it or give us some kind of time frame. They've announced it and said it's a done deal, I don't see why it's so hard to authorize us all for network use. ):

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've asked this before, but now that a deal has been struck, how much of a priority do you think Morgantown is, considering the college of 30,000+ students?

I've wondered this too and I'd have to think it would be a top priority in both sprint and ntelos eyes. Its one of the largest markets they serve and considering sprint/ntelos is the only provider left in Morgantown that does not offer LTE you would think they'd want to stay competitive. That being said, nothing they've ever done makes me believe my wishes will come true. I'd like to see it turn on soon but I'm not holding my breath.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wondering if HD Voice will be implemented here as well since I see no mention of it in the powerpoints.  Robert, do you have any knowledge on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wondering if HD Voice will be implemented here as well since I see no mention of it in the powerpoints. Robert, do you have any knowledge on this?

I don't have the answers you seek. It's a great question though. Wondering myself.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This question would just as well apply to C'ville/UVA

And Blacksburg too.

 

That said I get the feeling that nTelos generally goes after the "townie" population rather than students; these days most students are on their parents' plan from a major carrier. At least in Blacksburg they didn't seem to market themselves to students much. So really the lack of LTE affects the wholesale side in college towns more than nTelos' retail operation.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Giving them until 2017 doesn't bode well for timely completion, in my eyes. Does Sprint have much recourse until after 2017 if nTelos hasn't done anything? Sprint has done much more work in a shorter period of time, I don't see why two states couldn't be done in a more aggressive timeframe, other than that I know nTelos doesn't have much money and will probably have contractors take their sweet time due to how little they can afford to pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are quite conservative financially. They figure they might outlast Sprint just like their last national carrier, so they do not want to be stuck with debt. Don't forget even Verizon does not have more than half of its people using LTE (they still have dumb phones or only Wi-Fi tablets)

 

sent by tapatalk from my LS-980 (G2)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we know where they have "launched" LTE yet for their current customers?  Is it still Beckley, Bluefield, Waynesboro, Staunton or something like that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we know where they have "launched" LTE yet for their current customers? Is it still Beckley, Bluefield, Waynesboro, Staunton or something like that?

Yes still only those 4 markets.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...