Jump to content

Shentel / Sprint LTE - (was ntelos - West & N&W Virginia)


marioc21

Recommended Posts

you lucky i am in roanoke va and i get 0.10up and 0.50down consenstly

You do realize that's the speed of Tmo 2G, right? So that's the max you ever would have. At least on Sprint 3G, you can get up to 2.65Mbps. And you can get LTE when you travel. Whereas if you use Tmo 2G, that's all you'd have even when you travel into Tmo LTE coverage.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize that's the speed of Tmo 2G, right? So that's the max you ever would have. At least on Sprint 3G, you can get up to 2.65Mbps. And you can get LTE when you travel. Whereas if you use Tmo 2G, that's all you'd have even when you travel into Tmo LTE coverage.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

Such coverage.. very wow.

 

PYDIhPM.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks that [rpberly better than what im getting right now tho which is 0.50up and 0.10 with sprint and ty for all the help im googling 2g speeds now

That's all you would get on 2G. If that. 2G is slow slow slow. I don't think you're getting it.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do get with everyone saying, it just when i bought my iphone 5s i bought me an warrenty with it squaretrade, and also spoke with an sprint service rep, they told me it can be unlocked they just dont know how to do it, but the code is 000000

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do get with everyone saying, it just when i bought my iphone 5s i bought me an warrenty with it squaretrade, and also spoke with an sprint service rep, they told me it can be unlocked they just dont know how to do it, but the code is 000000

 

 

 

Specifically, devices manufactured with a SIM slot within the past three years (including, but not limited to, all Apple iPhone devices), cannot be unlocked to accept a different domestic carrier's SIM for use on another domestic carrier's network. Sprint has no technological process available to do this. In accordance with Sprint's voluntary commitment contained within CTIA's Consumer Code for Wireless Service (“Unlocking Commitment”), Sprint is working to ensure that all devices developed and launched on or after February 11, 2015 are capable of being unlocked domestically

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

nexus 5?

 

sent by tapatalk from my LS-980 (G2)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nexus 5?

 

sent by tapatalk from my LS-980 (G2)

 

Inherently unlocked. An exception to that rule. The difference being it was manufactured by Google, for Google, rather than being manufactured specifically for Sprint like all other devices.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So any news on the actual topic of this thread?

 

Not that I know of. I believe more info will come out once CCA goes into full force as Ntelos was clearly seen on the screen of carriers that participate in the CCA . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NTelos to host Q1 2014 Earnings Call on May 7th at 10am ET. 

 

Details:

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ntelos-host-conference-call-may-200500930.html

 

Maybe there will finally be some news.  But don't hold your breath. 

 

Is there a way to listen into the earnings call live? Should have RTFL!

What better way to spend the last day of classes!

Edited by anthonyrinaldi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just listened to the call. No comment on any negotiation with Sprint. No mention of CCA AT ALL. When asked about Sprint looking at sites for their own infrastructure in the market, nTelos indicated it was not happening.

 

This pretty much tears it. I'll be gone if there isn't light at the end of the tunnel by when I can get an iPhone 6. It is inexcusable the way Sprint ignores this market. AT&T switched on LTE here officially yesterday. 

 

I have big worries nTelos is a part of the CCA according to Sprint entirely due to the existing 3G agreement. 

Edited by Jimmy James
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just listened to the call. No comment on any negotiation with Sprint. No mention of CCA AT ALL. When asked about Sprint looking at sites for their own infrastructure in the market, nTelos indicated it was not happening.

 

This pretty much tears it. I'll be gone if there isn't light at the end of the tunnel by when I can get an iPhone 6. It is inexcusable the way Sprint ignores this market. AT&T switched on LTE here officially yesterday. 

 

 

I can't blame you for leaving, but is Sprint really ignoring the market? It's not even an actual Sprint market. Sprint can't do anything about it, other than threaten to cut ties with nTelos and leave Sprint subscribers there with no network, or overbuild. Both of which would be even more disruptive than what is currently happening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would at least like to know what exactly is holding it all back... It sucks how in the dark we are about it. They announce the whole CCA deal but nothing really followed yet.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't blame you for leaving, but is Sprint really ignoring the market? It's not even an actual Sprint market. Sprint can't do anything about it, other than threaten to cut ties with nTelos and leave Sprint subscribers there with no network, or overbuild. Both of which would be even more disruptive than what is currently happening. 

 

Until I found this site, absolutely nothing Sprint ever said in any way disclosed to me the situation in this market. They certainly sold me services for years as though they they existed here. I'm hardly their only subscriber in the area.

 

I don't think overbuilding would be more disruptive. They have a 3G contract with nTelos. At least then there would be evidence of a light at the end of a tunnel. As it is, I have absolutely no idea if I re-up with Sprint what would conceivably be different at the end of 2 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We canceled my wife's line with Sprint and went with nTelos. Ignorant to pay more money plus 'premium data charge' for LTE service we'll never get.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

Yes, it is much smarter to buy service from a company who actually has service in your area. Glad you're no longer ignorant. Best of luck to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still curious what, if anything, this really means for those of us Sprint customers in nTelos land

 

Another question: if my family jumps ship for another carrier, are our Sprint phones now worthless?

 

Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was at the Yankees vs Tigers game today and besides being a terrible day to have good seats, T-Mobile had great speeds via the stadium's DAS. I consistently saw 500-600Mbps on 5G and on LTE I got upwards of 200Mbps. I noticed that the stadiums DAS is broadcasting 140MHz n41 while macros that surround the stadium are at 80MHz. 
    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...