Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 3


linhpham2

Recommended Posts

If they would have just released 25 models of tri-band phones and updated 39,000 sites with all the bands last week this wouldn't be an issue! (Thinking harder about it -- what *IS* better to have first the device or the network??? chicken or egg)... This will be my last post on the issue -- but you really got me thinking about what is the better way to 'have it'...

 

I would prefer to have the device first.  That way, the very moment service is live in my area, I can use it.  And that's the way Sprint does it.  However, logisitically, this period is the absolute earliest that Sprint Dualband and Triband LTE devices could hit the market.  

 

So I definitely would not want them to wait to convert the Clearwire WiMax network to TD-LTE until devices were available.  I'm glad they could get a start on it before the devices versus waiting.  But I definitely would not want them to wait until the entire network is upgraded for them to sell the devices.

 

Robert

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can be the best damn RF performer in the world but you will stuck using that one lane highway for the 2 years you have it and that nice 10 lane interstate is staring at you and you can't use it. No thanks. Then to further rub it in you can't use the 800LTE either.

Yeah, which is why unless the tri-band phones out there turn out to be pitiful, I'll be looking outside the Sammy stable.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

I don't think any serious user should consider buying the Sprint Note 3 unless they were going to get a Sprint Triband hotspot to pair it with.  Network usability trumps all other phone features, including screen size. :imo:

 

Robert

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think any serious user should consider buying the Sprint Note 3 unless they were going to get a Sprint Triband hotspot to pair it with. Network usability trumps all other phone features, including screen size. :imo:

 

Robert

Agree completely. No point if I can't get a reliable signal anywhere.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...so just get it done as fast as possible (device OR network).

 

That's something I think we all can agree.  And the Clearwire TD-LTE deployment is going way faster.  For obvious reasons.  It's roughly the same scope as Tmo's LTE upgrade.  Overlay, baby!

 

Robert

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's something I think we all can agree. And the Clearwire TD-LTE deployment is going way faster. For obvious reasons. It's roughly the same scope as Tmo's LTE upgrade. Overlay, baby!

 

Robert

Unless you don't have anything to overlay :(

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overlay, baby!

Yes, getting overlaid is good, very good.

 

Unless you don't have anything to overlay :(

I guess digiblur gets underlaid.

 

:P

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better than not getting laid ;)

 

Well, the prefix "under" is relative -- it could indicate zero.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sprint version Note 3 has finally cleared the FCC, can someone give us a rundown or an article like you guys have done on the front page for new phones like RF info, etc? Or in this thread if you have it now?

 

EDIT: The one thing I do love about my EVO LTE is that when I'm on a call I can still surf the web! My car broke down recently and I needed this to use GPS and some other stuff while waiting on a ten hour, lol, hold. :)

 

Thanks,

 

5th

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sprint version Note 3 has finally cleared the FCC, can someone give us a rundown or an article like you guys have done on the front page for new phones like RF info, etc? Or in this thread if you have it now?

 

EDIT: The one thing I do love about my EVO LTE is that when I'm on a call I can still surf the web! My car broke down recently and I needed this to use GPS and some other stuff while waiting on a ten hour, lol, hold. :)

 

Thanks,

 

5th

 

What do you want to know?  If you are looking to confirm triband LTE support for the Note 3, you will be disappointed.  The Note 3 will be single band LTE 1900 unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can be the best damn RF performer in the world but you will stuck using that one lane highway for the 2 years you have it and that nice 10 lane interstate is staring at you and you can't use it. No thanks. Then to further rub it in you can't use the 800LTE either.

Well at least interstate 1900 won't be as congested. All the cool kids with their fancy new toys will be on interstate 2600 and 800, they'll spend less and less time on i1900. So even though it's a one lane highway hopefully it'll move a little faster once more and more ppl use the other 2 freeways. :)

 

Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well at least interstate 1900 won't be as congested. All the cool kids with their fancy new toys will be on interstate 2600 and 800, they'll spend less and less time on i1900. So even though it's a one lane highway hopefully it'll move a little faster once more and more ppl use the other 2 freeways. :)

 

Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 4

 

I wouldn't say that.  There are still too many single band LTE 1900 phones out there so at least for the next 8 months or so it will still be congested.  Unless there is a huge flux of Wimax customers who have upgrades and flock to the LG G2, Nexus 5 and perhaps HTC One Max (assuming its triband) I wouldn't expect to see any difference in overall network balance of LTE 1900.  For a lot of Sprint customers that are not S4GRU members they will buy the Note 3 without knowing its not triband.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say that. There are still too many single band LTE 1900 phones out there so at least for the next 8 months or so it will still be congested. Unless there is a huge flux of Wimax customers who have upgrades and flock to the LG G2, Nexus 5 and perhaps HTC One Max (assuming its triband) I wouldn't expect to see any difference in overall network balance of LTE 1900. For a lot of Sprint customers that are not S4GRU members they will buy the Note 3 without knowing its not triband.

I'm just trying to look at the bright side here. Would've been huge for a triband gn3. For consumers and for the network. But oh well. I'm even glad the iPhone is at least dual band. Every little bit helps. Even if it means just one less phone streaming video on my sector, I'll take it. Every week should get better for the 1900ers. And who knows maybe by Christmas when all the new iPhones and Tribands are under the tree, all the 1900ers can enjoy streaming xmas logs with no issues. Including the gn3 adopters. Maybe. Doesn't solve indoor and fringe issues, but hey its something. No worse then the gn2 that people already love.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's for sure coming to sprint. We received something about it in our weekly news at work. There's not a date yet but Verizon has it listed as being released on 10/10 so I'd hope we're somewhere around there.

Did it have a model number?

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to keep lying to myself and say, the official Sprint variant hasn't been released by the FCC yet. That the version released supports Bands 0/1/10/25 for roaming purposes for Softbank users and that another variant is still in testing.

 

Was it not stated during the Q2 call that all smartphones going forward was going to support Band 26 with the unspoken iPhone not being detailed yet?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the way your thinking COZisback. If the note 3 wasn't at least dual band id be extremely disappointed. Really not wanting a htc or lg phone ever!

 

Sent from my rooted G Note 2 Using TapaTalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would the addition of tri-band do the thickness of the phone if anything? Heard a clueless store employee telling someone that it would make it thicker and that was why the N3 wasn't getting it.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the way your thinking COZisback. If the note 3 wasn't at least dual band id be extremely disappointed. Really not wanting a htc or lg phone ever!

 

Sent from my rooted G Note 2 Using TapaTalk 4 Beta

 

It's just my opinion, but I really don't believe the variant that's been released is Sprint. This may be why an announcement from Sprint hasn't occurred yet. I understand Sprint is not VZW in demands, but Sprint still has to buy the Note 3 from Samsung and if the device isn't up to par and direction of where Sprint is going, they don't have to buy it. They've said no to devices before. I personally believe Samsung has made a solid amount of money from Sprint so why not accommodate the network the provider supports. It looks bad when two users are getting two different experiences from the same provider from two different manufactures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the way your thinking COZisback. If the note 3 wasn't at least dual band id be extremely disappointed. Really not wanting a htc or lg phone ever!

 

Sent from my rooted G Note 2 Using TapaTalk 4 Beta

 

What is wrong with HTC or LG?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...