Jump to content

Softbank - New Sprint - Discussion


linhpham2

Recommended Posts

Customers with low ARPU that Sprint didn't really mind losing.

 

That's just silly.  Sprint minds losing EVERY customer.  Keeping old customers is a lot cheaper than finding new ones.

 

You don't think those low ARPU legacy nextel users became higher ARPU sprint customers?  Sadly, instead of sticking with Sprint, they became higher ARPU AT&T or Verizon customers.

 

It's not like these customers had anywhere cheaper to go - I am surprised you feel that Sprint wouldn't mind losing customers that could be higher ARPU Sprint users.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's just silly.  Sprint minds losing EVERY customer.  Keeping old customers is a lot cheaper than finding new ones.

 

You don't think those low ARPU legacy nextel users became higher ARPU sprint customers?  Sadly, instead of sticking with Sprint, they became higher ARPU AT&T or Verizon customers.

 

It's not like these customers had anywhere cheaper to go - I am surprised you feel that Sprint wouldn't mind losing customers that could be higher ARPU Sprint users.

 

I know some of the customer left because they felt they were treated poorly during the migration. I disagree but this is what I am hearing from some guys around here who went to Verizon after the shutdown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's just silly.  Sprint minds losing EVERY customer.  Keeping old customers is a lot cheaper than finding new ones.

 

You don't think those low ARPU legacy nextel users became higher ARPU sprint customers?  Sadly, instead of sticking with Sprint, they became higher ARPU AT&T or Verizon customers.

 

It's not like these customers had anywhere cheaper to go - I am surprised you feel that Sprint wouldn't mind losing customers that could be higher ARPU Sprint users.

It's not silly, you're silly! Losses were expected and planned for. The recapture rate was made as high as possible through offers to existing customers and active customer support. I can safely say they don't mind because they knew it was coming, planned for it, expected it, did everything they could to negate it. When they only got a small recapture rate, well, it's not like they wringed their hands over it and cried over lost low-ARPU Nextel subs. They instead focused on growth and moved forward.

 

So yeah. Of course they mind, but they don't really mind. Hesse has said it in the past couple quarters earnings calls. It's just not a huge deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not silly, you're silly! Losses were expected and planned for. The recapture rate was made as high as possible through offers to existing customers and active customer support. I can safely say they don't mind because they knew it was coming, planned for it, expected it, did everything they could to negate it. When they only got a small recapture rate, well, it's not like they wringed their hands over it and cried over lost low-ARPU Nextel subs. They instead focused on growth and moved forward.

 

So yeah. Of course they mind, but they don't really mind. Hesse has said it in the past couple quarters earnings calls. It's just not a huge deal.

 

Yeah, I know what you mean.

 

It's impossible to recapture every iDEN subscriber but it still is cheaper keeping these very loyal (lazy?) customers.  I would suspect that once they've moved to AT&T or Verizon, they'll never move back.

 

Obviously, it's all said and done at this point but any customer who stuck with nextel till the last day will probably stick with whatever carrier they moved to for the foreseeable future, making them very attractive subs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I know what you mean.

 

It's impossible to recapture every iDEN subscriber but it still is cheaper keeping these very loyal (lazy?) customers.  I would suspect that once they've moved to AT&T or Verizon, they'll never move back.

 

Obviously, it's all said and done at this point but any customer who stuck with nextel till the last day will probably stick with whatever carrier they moved to for the foreseeable future, making them very attractive subs.

I somewhat disagree with the loyalty statement. Mostly because these customers were loyal to Nextel, and nothing else. Many, many of them simply didn't want change. So while I agree that they likely won't move again, I'd say it's more from general stubbornness than anything else. Going off of anecdotal experience dealing with Nextel subs. I could give you quite the "stereotype"...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put it this way. The customer is not always right, and it is often better to dispose of disgruntled customers than to continue to serve them. Let them go be another business' potential problem.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the last time Sprint gets to blame Nextel

Not exactly. Recovering from surgery after having the Nextel tumor removed takes time, and the tumor is still to blame for the pain of recovery.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was a good writeup on the earnings call.  One interesting nugget noted.

 

 

Steve Elfman, president of network operations at Sprint, gave a hint of that long-term strategy when he noted during the call that Sprint now plans to deploy Clearwire's 2. 5 GHz spectrum on all 38,000 of its planned Network Vision cell sites and even more sites than that in a nationwide rollout. Previously, Sprint had said it would use Clearwire's spectrum as a "hotspot" LTE network to offload traffic in urban markets. Now, it appears Clearwire's spectrum will become a much more integral part of Sprint's long-term plans to boost overall capacity on its network. The expanded deployment of Clearwire's spectrum will continue through next year. Clearwire commands around 160 MHz of spectrum in the top 100 markets. 
 

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-loses-2m-subs-and-16b-nextel-shutdown-plans-nationwide-25-ghz-lte-ne/2013-07-30

 

 

The earnings call recording and presentation materials are here if anyone is interested: http://investors.sprint.com/CorporateProfile.aspx?iid=4057219

 

Edit: Sorry, didn't realize this was already posted in another thread.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was a good writeup on the earnings call.  One interesting nugget noted.

 

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-loses-2m-subs-and-16b-nextel-shutdown-plans-nationwide-25-ghz-lte-ne/2013-07-30

 

 

The earnings call recording and presentation materials are here if anyone is interested: http://investors.sprint.com/CorporateProfile.aspx?iid=4057219

 

Edit: Sorry, didn't realize this was already posted in another thread.

 

Will they keep most of Clearwire's sites that are not co-located with Sprint?  Sounds like it they they planning for 38000 sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will they keep most of Clearwire's sites that are not co-located with Sprint? Sounds like it they they planning for 38000 sites.

I didn't listen to the call, but from the writeups I've seen so far, it sounds like they are keeping all Clearwire sites that are not colocated or redundant. They said they would even add additional infill sites with TDD-LTE 2600 where needed between Sprint NV sites. It turns out all the TD-LTE rumors were true.

 

Although I will be a believer when they show up to my rural New Mexico site and install TD-LTE 2600. :)

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't listen to the call, but from the writeups I've seen so far, it sounds like they are keeping all Clearwire sites that are not colocated or redundant. They said they would even add additional infill sites with TDD-LTE 2600 where needed between Sprint NV sites. It turns out all the TD-LTE rumors were true. Although I will be a believer when they show up to my rural New Mexico site and install TD-LTE 2600. :) Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

Sprint looks to be a monster network! What will the total count be? over 50000 sites?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint looks to be a monster network! What will the total count be? over 50000 sites?

At least 8000 new sprint sites as approximately 40% of clearwire sites are colocated with sprint.

 

Sent from my SPH-D710

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint looks to be a monster network! What will the total count be? over 50000 sites?

You will never get caught up on sleep...

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't listen to the call, but from the writeups I've seen so far, it sounds like they are keeping all Clearwire sites that are not colocated or redundant. They said they would even add additional infill sites with TDD-LTE 2600 where needed between Sprint NV sites. It turns out all the TD-LTE rumors were true.

 

Neal thinks that TD-LTE 2600 will be the primary roaming band between Sprint and SoftBank, since SoftBank has the equivalent of BRS/EBS 2600 MHz spectrum in Japan.  Lots of infill sites will be required to make that TD-LTE 2600 overlay more consistent here in the US.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neal thinks that TD-LTE 2600 will be the primary roaming band between Sprint and SoftBank, since SoftBank has the equivalent of BRS/EBS 2600 MHz spectrum in Japan. Lots of infill sites will be required to make that TD-LTE 2600 overlay more consistent here in the US.

 

AJ

Are they gonna target contiguous TD everywhere they have PCS sites? Even on the sites along interstate?

 

I really don't think roaming costs are the reason Softy wants to have ubiquitous TD coverage.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did the earnings call mention anything about expansion? I am still wondering what Masayoshi Son meant about matching Verizon's high speed coverage.

They're not gonna announce "we're gonna buy us cellular, Cspire, ntelos" on a conference call.

 

Do you have an article quoting him about matching Verizon's coverage?

I'd like to see that quote.

Edited by asdf190
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did the earnings call mention anything about expansion? I am still wondering what Masayoshi Son meant about matching Verizon's high speed coverage. 

Obviously, he's talking about beating VZW in the Speed/Area ratio. Just need to be faster in enough places to say "We've got more megabyte/miles than VZW!"

 

:P

 

(I feel like AJ is rubbing off on me)

 

Edit: Wait, it's Megabits/second * 1/miles so it's really Megabits per second-mile. guh.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...