Jump to content

New Sprint Plans...Unlimited, My Way, My All-In


Paynefanbro

Recommended Posts

Sprint announced them from Samsung and LG that's how he knows tri bad is coming thisbyear

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/tri-band-4g-lte-mobile-broadband-devices-to-bring-sprint-customers-stronger-in-building-coverage-and-better-network-performance.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you guys think about Sprints new My Way feature. I think that its Sprint's way of saying we might get rid of Unlimited :( I hope im wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the rude awakening will more likely be from the degraded in-building and network performance.

 

 

How do you know triband phones are coming this fall?

And why is it a rude awakening? Is Sprint lying to them regarding the bands the phones work on?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then it should be a lot higher than 283 million since Verizon covers 298 million with LTE (and probably more with voice).

 

Verizon’s 4G network now covers 298 million people and covers 95 percent of the U.S. population.

 

http://gigaom.com/2013/06/27/verizon-wraps-up-lte-rollout-plans-all-voip-phone-launch-for-late-2014/

 

That 298 million people cover is for Verizon along with their roaming partners. Just like Sprint has Shentel and many other partners. When you are on Shentel's network with a Sprint phone it will not show you as roaming, but you are truly on a network built by Shentel. Verizon does the same thing. Now I do not know if Sprint has roaming agreements with the same wireless providers as Verizon, I'm guessing no, so that is why there could be the difference. This means we can roam on Verizon, since Sprint has a Verizon roaming agreement, but Sprint users probably cannot roam on to some of Verizon's partners. Likewise when Verizon customers are on those partner networks, it will not show up as roaming. Did I get this right at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on the FAQ it is clear that there will still be a choice between plans:

Posted Image

Well, that answers the question for me! Thanks for posting it. I'm sure the detractors will have an explanation for that too.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

If it's true, great! When it comes to wireless companies I prefer to take the expect the worst, hope for the best type mentality. And that's the last I have to say about that.

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's true, great! When it comes to wireless companies I prefer to take the expect the worst, hope for the best type mentality. And that's the last I have to say about that.

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

I understand why you'd feel that way. I just have a hard time grasping pessimism. Believing the worst even without evidence of it is hard for me.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm talking about users coming from Cellular 850 networks though.

Again, that's not different from current Sprint LTE users.

 

The network is getting built so someone had to get screwed. It's not as if Sprint could afford to say "Thank you for your interest but network is over capacity. We're gonna hold off on new adds until NV is done and triband LTE is available"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint should have waited until tri-band phones came out before announcing new plans. Even if they entice some from ATT/VZW, they are going to get a rude awakening when finding out their new phone doesn't work on 800 or 2500 LTE coming within the next year.

 

Major timing error by Sprint. Why did they have to rush out this plan now? Tri-band phones are coming this fall.

Is there really ever an error in providing more options and choices in plans for the consumer? I think this is just a little bit ridiculous.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's dumb that they are going to throttle for video, especially since all the new devices are full hd and need a decent bandwidth.

No. They reserve the right to throttle down to 1Mbps on devices if they feel they need to for network performance only for the people who choose this plan. No one is affected except for those who chose to be.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And as a result we can no longer be considered "Truly Unlimited."

 

No. They reserve the right to throttle down to 1Mbps on devices if they feel they need to for network performance only for the people who choose this plan. No one is affected except for those who chose to be.

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd bet, they used to advertise 230 million covered on the Sprint network and 280 with roaming.

 

That must have been quite some time ago. They advertised 274 million POPs for the Sprint network and 276 million POPs for the Nextel network for the longest time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh, then maybe the number they currently show on the site is without roaming.

 

 

That must have been quite some time ago. They advertised 274 million POPs for the Sprint network and 276 million POPs for the Nextel network for the longest time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no expert on plans (been on sero forever) but are people really complaining that these new unlimited plans are more expensive then the limited minute plans that are currently available? the unlimited family plan currently offered is way more expensive then this option.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no expert on plans (been on sero forever) but are people really complaining that these new unlimited plans are more expensive then the limited minute plans that are currently available? the unlimited family plan currently offered is way more expensive then this option.

 

Correct but all providers will now be automatically upselling you to unlimited voice just to increase revenue. Most people I know would never have a use for unlimited minutes to a land line.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And as a result we can no longer be considered "Truly Unlimited."

My patience is really starting to wear thin. This is a bullshit post. If they sell any plans that are not truly unlimited and offer them as additional choices to consumers, then they are no longer truly unlimited? Go push your platitudes somewhere else. I require you to stick to the facts here.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

274 native?

 

That's what they claimed. Obviously I have no way if they were telling the truth or not, but yeah that's it said or at least used to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan Hesse talked specifically about throttling in the "Truly Unlimited" commercials, I'm simply pointing out it's no longer so. I didn't say there were no longer any other plan options.

 


 

My patience is really starting to wear thin. This is a bullshit post. If they sell any plans that are not truly unlimited and offer them as additional choices to consumers, then they are no longer truly unlimited? Go push your platitudes somewhere else. I require you to stick to the facts here.

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what they claimed. Obviously I have no way if they were telling the truth or not, but yeah that's it said or at least used to say.

Yay! That means that they're gonna expand LTE to the same number, right? If they're covering 274 with voice TODAY that means its all with PCS. Sure, some may be affiliates but I've read (here) that they're also upgrading to NV, right?

 

If they're gonna expand LTE PCS to 274 mil, that's HUGE. Remember how ATT said they were only gonna do 250 mil and that was with 700 MHz!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yay! That means that they're gonna expand LTE to the same number, right? If they're covering 274 with voice TODAY that means its all with PCS. Sure, some may be affiliates but I've read (here) that they're also upgrading to NV, right? If they're gonna expand LTE PCS to 274 mil, that's HUGE. Remember how ATT said they were only gonna do 250 mil and that was with 700 MHz!

 

Some affiliates are... lets say... more troubling then others. Shentel is on the ball with their deployment but swiftel, ntelos, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...