Jump to content

All Sprint acquisition discussion (was "Japan's Softbank in talks for $12.8 bln Sprint stake")


kckid

Recommended Posts

OK, now that the deal is close to closing, what has Sprint gotten out of the deal? $5B which is not enough to finance the Clearwire deal and payoff Clearwire debt. So in essence, Sprint is not that much better off financially. Asset wise, yes, but debt wise no. I am slightly dissapointed. Will Softbank be able to finance further acquisitions?

 

I just don't see how Sprint will be able to finance $16B in capex from operations.  I guess I'm from Missouri. Show me!

 

They're banking a lot on "synergies". Especially lower equipment costs for handsets as well as network equipment by buying for both Japan and the U.S. operations. 

 

The 2nd quarter earnings report will be interesting to see on July 30.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're banking a lot on "synergies". Especially lower equipment costs for handsets as well as network equipment by buying for both Japan and the U.S. operations.

 

The 2nd quarter earnings report will be interesting to see on July 30.

The 2nd report will blow. They predicted 30-40% Nextel recapture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would the cost of additional backhaul possibly cause Sprint to transition to Sprintlink?

What timeframe would that be?

 

Sprint didn't transition SprintLink, that still exists. Not sure what you're asking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're banking a lot on "synergies". Especially lower equipment costs for handsets as well as network equipment by buying for both Japan and the U.S. operations. 

 

The 2nd quarter earnings report will be interesting to see on July 30.  

 

There might be some savings, a billion here and a billion there, but I don't see $8B for this year, let alone for next year as well. I will be watching the quarterly earnings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There might be some savings, a billion here and a billion there, but I don't see $8B for this year, let alone for next year as well. I will be watching the quarterly earnings.

"Synergies" is a buzzword analysts like to hear so Softbank obliged.

How much do you think vendor's margins are? Since ZTE and Huawei are out, Softy HAS to pick Samsung + Europeans for both Japan and America to get discounts and the afore four know this.

 

The $8bil/ year is OBVIOUSLY from Softbank.

 

It's gonna be another year until Sprint NV is done. Of course they're not gonna see huge revenue spike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Synergies" is a buzzword analysts like to hear so Softbank obliged. The $8bil/ year is OBVIOUSLY from Softbank. It's gonna be another year until Sprint NV is done. Of course they're not gonna see huge revenue spike.

 

Yes, analysts love to hear that, but synergies are the hardest to quantify and of course the hardest to realize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like lemmings, they'd jump off a cliff if you told them they'd find synergies there.

 

Yep, and of course nobody ever follows up to measure and verify those promised synergies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would Sprint ever transition its cell backhaul to Sprintlink?

 

They do that now. That's one of the coolest perks of being a Sprint corporate customer, the organic hooks into the MPLS core. Essentially, from a network standpoint, the wireless phones and wireline routers and equipment ride the same core, so they see each other as endpoints.

 

http://convergence.sprint.com/mobileintegration.aspx

 

All of Sprint's wireless traffic travels over the SL core, and only hands off to local sites where Sprint doesn't have last-mile service. For example, an office I've visited has a direct hook from the base station into the SL core.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would Sprint ever transition its cell backhaul to Sprintlink?

 

SprintLink is long haul fiber.  Tapping into that at each cell site would be like landing a 747 in my front yard to pick me up.  No, I have to get into my car and drive to the nearest major airport first, and that is akin to the metro fiber backhaul that is run to each cell site.  Then, the backhaul traffic is transferred to SprintLink for the long haul.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They do that now. That's one of the coolest perks of being a Sprint corporate customer, the organic hooks into the MPLS core. Essentially, from a network standpoint, the wireless phones and wireline routers and equipment ride the same core, so they see each other as endpoints.

 

http://convergence.sprint.com/mobileintegration.aspx

 

All of Sprint's wireless traffic travels over the SL core, and only hands off to local sites where Sprint doesn't have last-mile service. For example, an office I've visited has a direct hook from the base station into the SL core.

In that case, I meant the last-mile service. Is it possible it might be cost effective for Sprint in the future to do its own last-mile service?

 

I'm not even talking about then selling it to other guys on the same tower but simply because of its own backhaul costs. SINCE (I believe) Softy's only option for differentiation is TD-LTE to 150mil+, their backhaul needs will skyrocket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Synergies" is a buzzword analysts like to hear so Softbank obliged. How much do you think vendor's margins are? Since ZTE and Huawei are out, Softy HAS to pick Samsung + Europeans for both Japan and America to get discounts and the afore four know this. The $8bil/ year is OBVIOUSLY from Softbank. It's gonna be another year until Sprint NV is done. Of course they're not gonna see huge revenue spike.

 

No necessarily.  The last three quarters Sprint has spent approximately $1.4 billion, $1.9 billion and $1.8 billion on CapEx.  That's rate of about $6 - $7 billion per year in CapEx.  Now that the Nextel bleeding is done with they might be able to increase revenue enough to cover the additional $1-$2 a year they need.  If not then Softbank might have to infuse some capital into Sprint.  But it won't be $16 billion. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that case, I meant the last-mile service. Is it possible it might be cost effective for Sprint in the future to do its own last-mile service?

 

I'm not even talking about then selling it to other guys on the same tower but simply because of its own backhaul costs. SINCE (I believe) Softy's only option for differentiation is TD-LTE to 150mil+, their backhaul needs will skyrocket.

 

I doubt it, putting in fiber on every city block in NYC would cost more than it is worth. It's cheaper to lease fiber.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt it, putting in fiber on every city block in NYC would cost more than it is worth. It's cheaper to lease fiber.

 

Although Mayor Bloomberg already pushed an initiative to have every NYC block covered with fiber by 2020. He has Optimum, Verizon, and TWC on their toes with this one. My school in SoHo is only now getting FiOS and Verizon is starting to deploy fiber in my area, or at least I think so because I am seeing more Verizon trucks in my neighborhood. Optimum has LightPath available and they have 101Mbps service at my home already, where they can run the fiber into your business or home rather than the coaxial cable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although Mayor Bloomberg already pushed an initiative to have every NYC block covered with fiber by 2020. He has Optimum, Verizon, and TWC on their toes with this one. My school in SoHo is only now getting FiOS and Verizon is starting to deploy fiber in my area, or at least I think so because I am seeing more Verizon trucks in my neighborhood. Optimum has LightPath available and they have 101Mbps service at my home already, where they can run the fiber into your business or home rather than the coaxial cable.

 

Yeah too bad in places like Queens, where Verizon stopped putting in FiOS, and the buildings won't allow it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 2nd report will blow. They predicted 30-40% Nextel recapture.

Hopefully this will be offset by some of those us cellular customers in the midwest!

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No necessarily.  The last three quarters Sprint has spent approximately $1.4 billion, $1.9 billion and $1.8 billion on CapEx.  That's rate of about $6 - $7 billion per year in CapEx.  Now that the Nextel bleeding is done with they might be able to increase revenue enough to cover the additional $1-$2 a year they need.  If not then Softbank might have to infuse some capital into Sprint.  But it won't be $16 billion. 

 

That was borrowed money that Sprint was spending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see your point now: the $6-7bil per year Sprint has been spending is borrowed money and they can't keep borrowing $6-7bil a year at reasonable rates.

 Yes, it was financed by the vendors themselves.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see your point now: the $6-7bil per year Sprint has been spending is borrowed money and they can't keep borrowing $6-7bil a year at reasonable rates.

Actually, they can keep borrowing at even better rates than any other US telecom now. This is due to softbank being able to borrow on the Japanese bond market at EXTREMELY favorable rates. Even with their recent downgrade to junk status they still come out ahead on any borrowed monies than the competition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, they can keep borrowing at even better rates than any other US telecom now. This is due to softbank being able to borrow on the Japanese bond market at EXTREMELY favorable rates. Even with their recent downgrade to junk status they still come out ahead on any borrowed monies than the competition. 

They said the cap expend will come from Sprint not Softbank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...