Jump to content

Current Sprint PRLs


halcyoncmdr

Recommended Posts

If anyone knows, out of curiosity, which roam indicator corresponds to what in Sprint's PRLs (eg. Sprint, Extended, Roaming etc.)?  The ones I see mostly are 0, 1, 160, 162 and there are also a few 228s...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were you able to analyze changes in the new 5x054 series yet? Thx!

 

Sorry, have had a hectic week (web server problems, which are on-going) and had completely forgotten. 

 

I'll post some details a little later, but the biggest changes seem to be the addition of a number of "negative" records.  My quick research on the topic means these are networks that the phone IS NOT allowed to roam on.  Looks like this is primarily international operators (Some I can't identify, plus Bell, Nortel, Telus, Newtel, MT Mobility, IslandTel, SaskTel, Aliant Telecom, Hong Kong Telecom, China Telecom, Portatel Del Sureste, Comcel, Telecomunicaciones del Golfo, Operadora Unefon).

 

- Trip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll post some details a little later, but the biggest changes seem to be the addition of a number of "negative" records.  My quick research on the topic means these are networks that the phone IS NOT allowed to roam on.  Looks like this is primarily international operators (Some I can't identify, plus Bell, Nortel, Telus, Newtel, MT Mobility, IslandTel, SaskTel, Aliant Telecom, Hong Kong Telecom, China Telecom, Portatel Del Sureste, Comcel, Telecomunicaciones del Golfo, Operadora Unefon).

 

In the past, Sprint typically did not NEG certain SIDs, though VZW frequently did.

 

Looking at the list above, I think many/all of those operators are traitors who have switched over to the 3GPP side.  They still may operate skeleton CDMA2000 networks, though.  That could be the reason for the NEG tags.  Sprint now supports various levels of LTE/W-CDMA/GSM international roaming.  The NEG tags could ensure that the roaming does not fall on the barebones legacy CDMA2000 networks instead.

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the past, Sprint typically did not NEG certain SIDs, though VZW frequently did.

 

Looking at the list above, I think many/all of those operators are traitors who have switched over to the 3GPP side. They still may operate skeleton CDMA2000 networks, though. That could be the reason for the NEG tags. Sprint now supports various levels of LTE/W-CDMA/GSM international roaming. The NEG tags could ensure that the roaming does not fall on the barebones legacy CDMA2000 networks instead.

 

AJ

I was aware that sprint didn't allow international LTE roaming in any countries?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was aware that sprint didn't allow international LTE roaming in any countries?

 

Beep, beep, beep.

 

I am sorry, but you did not pose your response in the proper form of a question.

 

Mr. Connery, you have the board.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beep, beep, beep.

 

I am sorry, but you did not pose your response in the proper form of a question.

 

Mr. Connery, you have the board.

 

AJ

 

Let me try - when did Sprint start offering international LTE roaming?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beep, beep, beep.

 

I am sorry, but you did not pose your response in the proper form of a question.

 

Mr. Connery, you have the board.

 

AJ

I'll take Swords for 500 please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beep, beep, beep.

 

I am sorry, but you did not pose your response in the proper form of a question.

 

Mr. Connery, you have the board.

 

AJ

How's this:

Does sprint offer international LTE roaming?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I thought but AJ made it seem otherwise...

I mean they COULD roam on LTE. But for throttled speeds it doesn't really make sense.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean they COULD roam on LTE. But for throttled speeds it doesn't really make sense.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P

LTE roaming would help with with edge of cell ping as well as unthrottled data (open world/global roaming with high speed pass).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trip Ill have some more SCP files ready for you first thing tomorrow morning. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry, have had a hectic week (web server problems, which are on-going) and had completely forgotten. 

 

I'll post some details a little later, but the biggest changes seem to be the addition of a number of "negative" records.  My quick research on the topic means these are networks that the phone IS NOT allowed to roam on.  Looks like this is primarily international operators (Some I can't identify, plus Bell, Nortel, Telus, Newtel, MT Mobility, IslandTel, SaskTel, Aliant Telecom, Hong Kong Telecom, China Telecom, Portatel Del Sureste, Comcel, Telecomunicaciones del Golfo, Operadora Unefon).

 

- Trip

 

With a mandatory PRL coming up by the end of July for a number of markets (presumably for better LTE refarming since these areas are seeing spectrum swaps), have you noticed any changes in channels being checked?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With a mandatory PRL coming up by the end of July for a number of markets (presumably for better LTE refarming since these areas are seeing spectrum swaps), have you noticed any changes in channels being checked?

 

Yes.  Something PRL this way comes.  I received this message yesterday from Republic Wireless:

 

Important phone update required.

Our networks are undergoing changes that require a software update on your phone. These changes will impact both voice and data coverage starting July 1, 2016. To continue receiving the best coverage available, please update your Preferred Roaming List (PRL) to the latest version by taking the following steps on your Republic Wireless phone associated with the following phone number(s): (XXX) XXX-XXXX

 

Standard band class 1 CDMA2000 channel assignments all are xxx0 or xxx5.  In other words, they end in 0 or 5

I am awaiting some non xxx0 and non xxx5 band class 1 channel assignments in the PRL -- to reduce the 0.625 MHz guard bands and help enable 10 MHz FDD second carriers in PCS A/B block 30 MHz (15 MHz FDD) markets.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/tds-telecom-to-launch-mobile-service-via-nctc-s-mvno Surprising given merger.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...