Jump to content

Samsung GS4 SPH-L720T [TRI-BAND] (was "Sprint GS4 with Tri-Band support this Fall Official Thread")


Ascertion

Recommended Posts

Figured since I read a post from Robert confirming this, I figured we should make a thread about it and compile all of the information we find.  Anyone think it'll have the Snapdragon 800 in it?  If there's really an S4 w/ Tri-band support, I'll definitely hold out for it.  

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet it will be the Galaxy S 4 Active.

 

It wouldn't make too much sense to have two of nearly the exact same phone floating around that are indistinguishable except by model number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet it will be the Galaxy S 4 Active.

Oh, is that actually leaked all over the internet now? Our Samsung rep mentioned the S4 Active was coming soon, and said it was "super secret"... that was a few weeks ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, is that actually leaked all over the internet now? Our Samsung rep mentioned the S4 Active was coming soon, and said it was "super secret"... that was a few weeks ago.

No, I just drew it out of you!

 

The AT&T version has been confirmed but not a Sprint variant....... Until now  :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I just drew it out of you!

 

The AT&T version has been confirmed but not a Sprint variant.

Well, I can neither confirm nor deny a Sprint variant for sure... because he just mentioned that it was in development. Never actually said we were going to get it. So, uh, yeah! Plausible deniability. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are hilarious! When the Galaxy S 2 dropped on at&t and then the LTE version dropped, the Skyrocket (LTE enabled S2) was only a small bit larger than the S2. Looking thru the specs though, they didn't downsize the camera, which I don't expect them to with the Tri-Band Sprint LTE version of the S4. The active is for people who need a rugged device and have a habit of dropping their phones, or work in 'phone hazardous' conditions. I expect the Tri-Band S4 to be a small speed bump to the S4. But then again, this is just my crazy opinion. :wacko:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got told that, as the Tri-Band S4 gets produced, it will start replacing the original S4 in inventory as it gets rolled out, and nobody will see a difference in packaging, etc. Somehow, this seems like a phenomenally bad idea. I also don't think it's true, as this was "water cooler" talk. Take it with a bucket of salt.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got told that, as the Tri-Band S4 gets produced, it will start replacing the original S4 in inventory as it gets rolled out, and nobody will see a difference in packaging, etc. Somehow, this seems like a phenomenally bad idea. I also don't think it's true, as this was "water cooler" talk. Take it with a bucket of salt.

 

That's practically what T-mobile did. Start emptying their HSPA+ only GS3's quietly when their LTE GS3's started appearing. Didn't turn out that bad for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

No, I just drew it out of you!

 

The AT&T version has been confirmed but not a Sprint variant.

 

 

Well, I can neither confirm nor deny a Sprint variant for sure... because he just mentioned that it was in development. Never actually said we were going to get it. So, uh, yeah! Plausible deniability.

Sprint may be releasing a new gs4 that's not called the Active. It might be the Samsung Galaxy S 4 Epic Touch Hands Free Air Gesture Motion Sensor 4G.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint may be releasing a new gs4 that's not called the Active. It might be the Samsung Galaxy S 4 Epic Touch Hands Free Air Gesture Motion Sensor 4G.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

no NOn no no. 

 

It's the Sprint  Exclusive Samsung Galaxy S4 1080P Super Amoled High Definition Epic 4g Tri-Band LTE Touch

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the SESGS41080PSAHDE4GTBLTET?

Rolls off the tongue like projectile vomited alphabet soup.

 

 

I'd probably still buy it as all I am waiting on right now is pretty much any triband phone to arrive.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint may be releasing a new gs4 that's not called the Active. It might be the Samsung Galaxy S 4 Epic Touch Hands Free Air Gesture Motion Sensor 4G.

 

no NOn no no. 

 

It's the Sprint  Exclusive Samsung Galaxy S4 1080P Super Amoled High Definition Epic 4g Tri-Band LTE Touch

So, the SESGS41080PSAHDE4GTBLTET?

 

Or, for short, "The Son".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Add me to the list of folks who will buy it when it comes out. I'm pretty darned happy with my S III, but I bounce between areas that LTE in SMR would benefit. And, when the Clearwire snafu gets un-snafu'd, my area will probably get 2500/2600 TD-LTE as well in relatively short order.

 

The only downside is that the rest of my family will need to wait for a Galaxy Victory-class device with SMR LTE, as they're in similar situations. Though for now they do of course have SMR 1x capability.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Figured since I read a post from Robert confirming this, I figured we should make a thread about it and compile all of the information we find.  Anyone think it'll have the Snapdragon 800 in it?  If there's really an S4 w/ Tri-band support, I'll definitely hold out for it.  

 

I highly doubt that Samsung would take the time to upgrade the processor from Snapdragon 600 to Snapdragon 800.  If there is a Galaxy S4 tri-band LTE model, it would pretty much be the same phone with upgraded internals.  Perhaps Samsung may give it a slightly different model number to distinguish the single band LTE model and tri band LTE model but I am not expecting big changes.

 

I am still curious though if Sprint will really put out an upgraded Galaxy S4.  I have already told my younger brother to wait until Fall to upgrade to the tri-band Galaxy S4 since he wants to upgrade his phone right now.  I don't want to disappoint him if it doesn't turn out to be true.  Hopefully this thread will provide any updates to news on a tri-band LTE Sprint Galaxy S4.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

New member here...been a Sprint customer for over 12 years consecutive!  Anyway, like everyone, I am waiting for Tri-band LTE phones.  I found this spec sheet on GS4 ACTIVE: http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9295_galaxy_s4_active-5446.php

 

 

4G Network LTE 800 / 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600   LTE 700 MHz Class 17 / 850 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 - SGH-I537

 

Now, I know that this is GSMArena and not actual Samsung spec...and not sure where they got this from.  (It is a rather thorough PREVIEW of the GS4A, as if they had their hands on it with actual testing!  No other review site has this much info.)

 

Anyways, does this mean that Active supports tri-band?  I know that Sprint tri-band LTE is 800, 1900, and 2500 (??).  I don't see 2500 being listed.

Edited by Thai
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's practically what T-mobile did. Start emptying their HSPA+ only GS3's quietly when their LTE GS3's started appearing. Didn't turn out that bad for them.

Like I said, this was water-cooler talk. This guy also told me, in the same breath, that the problems with the GS2 were due to the Ice Cream Sandwich update being done "on top" of "Honeycomb... or whatever... Gingerbread...", which caused the phone to run two operating systems at once. Riiiiiiiight...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New member here...been a Sprint customer for over 12 years consecutive! Anyway, like everyone, I am waiting for Tri-band LTE phones. I found this spec sheet on GS4 ACTIVE: http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9295_galaxy_s4_active-5446.php

 

 

4G Network LTE 800 / 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 LTE 700 MHz Class 17 / 850 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 - SGH-I537

 

Now, I know that this is GSMArena and not actual Samsung spec...and not sure where they got this from. (It is a rather thorough PREVIEW of the GS4A, as if they had their hands on it with actual testing! No other review site has this much info.)

 

Anyways, does this mean that Active supports tri-band? I know that Sprint tri-band LTE is 800, 1900, and 2500 (??). I don't see 2500 being listed.

 

2500 and 2600 are the same LTE Band. LTE Band 41. Some people call or 2500, and others call it 2600. They're pretty interchangeable. EBS is mostly in 2500 and BRS is mostly in 2600, but both are combined into one LTE band.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2500 and 2600 are the same LTE Band. LTE Band 41. Some people call or 2500, and others call it 2600. They're pretty interchangeable. EBS is mostly in 2500 and BRS is mostly in 2600, but both are combined into one LTE band.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Wrong. 2600 refers to Band 7, while 2500 refers to Band 41 (according to frequency indication conventions).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • This site is built but not live. eNB 41150 is still live. eNB 41188 is decommissioned but as far as I can tell the site at 200 West 55th is not built yet. This site is live gNB 1346302. This site is live gNB 1092074 This site is live gNB 1371671 This site is live gNB 1371860 — — — — — Sprint eNB 6156 -> T-Mobile gNB 1349260 Sprint eNB Unknown -> T-Mobile gNB 1325016 — — — — — Bonus T-Mobile 5G small cell, gNB 1348688 in Queens:  
    • FTTH JVs are city by city as well, so it's not going to really be sector by sector. It sounds like TMo wants to be able to sell everyone home broadband, but if that requires building additional infrastructure that infra will take the form of FTTH builds rather than mobile densification. Which involves tradeoffs, but the product is better than e.g. what AT&T is doing for me right now, which is offering only Internet Air in an area where they have 100/20 DSL available but not (yet) fiber.
    • Hopefully they do not wait until these sectors get so overloaded that they start getting nasty reviews and people abandon them. Getting fiber coverage to the area of a overloaded sector can take a year or more. I also question if this can all be managed.  Lots of sectors all over the country can get congested fairly quick.  Lots of work and money to get fiber installed and there goes the profitability on the venture.
    • MoffetNathanson Conference This is a conference where the CFO talks telecom financial analysts so obviously it takes a return on investment approach.  Broadly T-Mobile divides there world into top 100 markets (60%) and small town/rural (40%). They ultimately want to have at least 1/3 market share in rural. They also look at demographics like 50+ and Hispanic.  Reputation is now starting to help them with CIOs.  Did mention c-band buildout beginning in major cities as well as continued band migration to 5g. IMO they may become more aggressive at offering 5g phones to LTE holdover and 5g users without VoNR at a future date. mmWave not discussed. Price increases not discussed iirc. Did mention spectrum purchases from speculators. $9 billion all goes through same ROI process. FWA is down to hexagonal patterns by sector of fallow spectrum. Fiber JVs will go where sectors are overloaded.
    • I am lucky to be served by an excellent fiber ISP and that is the only reason I haven't tried TMOs FWA. Once you go fiber, it is REALLY hard to go back. The choice of sub-10ms ping times is a very artificial bucket, FWA will seldom get much below 10ms ping times but fiber regularly gets me 1-3ms ping times. Basically, at around those times, the speed of light and the distance you are from the server become the limiting factors. As an aside, my internet provider, ZiplyFiber, has been awesome. They peer like crazy at all the major IX in the area and, as a result, you end up with what essentially amounts to direct fiber connections to the vast majority of major data sources. While it isn't sexy, it makes my 1Gb/1Gb connection load pages significantly faster than my works 10Gb/10Gb connection. On the "sexy" side, they are also fastest ISP in the nation. They offer up to 50Gb/50Gb via a direct fiber connection to the router, albeit for an eye watering $900/mo.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...