Jump to content

Samsung GS4 SPH-L720T [TRI-BAND] (was "Sprint GS4 with Tri-Band support this Fall Official Thread")


Ascertion

Recommended Posts

 

 

2500 and 2600 are the same LTE Band. LTE Band 41. Some people call or 2500, and others call it 2600. They're pretty interchangeable. EBS is mostly in 2500 and BRS is mostly in 2600, but both are combined into one LTE band.

 

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Wrong. 2600 refers to Band 7, while 2500 refers to Band 41 (according to frequency indication conventions).

 

Since you started it...

 

Wrong!

 

LTE Band 41 is a TDD band from 2496 - 2690MHz. It's the same as WiMax. It's a roll up band for the 2500 and 2600 that includes the EBS band and BRS Band.

 

http://niviuk.free.fr/lte_band.php

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

2500 and 2600 are the same LTE Band. LTE Band 41. Some people call or 2500, and others call it 2600. They're pretty interchangeable. EBS is mostly in 2500 and BRS is mostly in 2600, but both are combined into one LTE band.

 

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Wrong. 2600 refers to Band 7, while 2500 refers to Band 41 (according to frequency indication conventions).

 

Upon re-reading, maybe you're referring to unofficial naming nomenclature, like in the way people refer to Cellular as 800, but better described as 850.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upon re-reading, maybe you're referring to unofficial naming nomenclature, like in the way people refer to Cellular as 800, but better described as 850.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Yeah, that's what I'm referring to. It's partially determined by middle downlink frequency, but not always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, that's what I'm referring to. It's partially determined by middle downlink frequency, but not always.

 

Thanks for the clarification. I initially read your post to say that Band 41 did not cover 2600MHz at all.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok... sorry but does the above info from my post indicate that GS4 ACTIVE will be tri-band?

The Galaxy S4 Active supports the following:

GSM 850/900/1800/1900

UMTS 850/900/1900/2100 (bands V, VIII, II, I)

LTE 800/850/900/1800/2100/2600 (band classes 20, 5, 8, 3, 1, 7)

 

The AT&T model swaps UMTS 900 (Band VIII) and the LTE band set for:

LTE 700/850/AWS/1900/2100 (band classes 17, 5, 4, 2, 1)

 

So, no. This device is useless with Sprint, since it doesn't even operate a UMTS-1900 (band II) network or a LTE band 2 network, much less an LTE band 7 one.

 

Also of note: if a device supports both 2500 and 2600, then it supports bands 38 and 7, not bands 41 and 7 (normally). At this moment, there are no parts that support BC 7, 38, and 41 simultaneously. Band 7 and 38 can be supported, or Band 41 can be supported.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong. 2600 refers to Band 7, while 2500 refers to Band 41 (according to frequency indication conventions).

 

Eh, I question that, as I have not seen any official documentation.  And even if there is official documentation, I would call it baloney.

 

For me, I have standardized on 2600 MHz because it is closest to the center of the band.  Call it a happy medium.  But I definitely agree with Robert that people use 2500 MHz, 2600 MHz, 2.5 GHz, and 2.6 GHz all interchangeably.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Galaxy S4 Active supports the following:

GSM 850/900/1800/1900

UMTS 850/900/1900/2100 (bands V, VIII, II, I)

LTE 800/850/900/1800/2100/2600 (band classes 20, 5, 8, 3, 1, 7)

 

The AT&T model swaps UMTS 900 (Band VIII) and the LTE band set for:

LTE 700/850/AWS/1900/2100 (band classes 17, 5, 4, 2, 1)

 

So, no. This device is useless with Sprint, since it doesn't even operate a UMTS-1900 (band II) network or a LTE band 2 network, much less an LTE band 7 one.

 

Also of note: if a device supports both 2500 and 2600, then it supports bands 38 and 7, not bands 41 and 7 (normally). At this moment, there are no parts that support BC 7, 38, and 41 simultaneously. Band 7 and 38 can be supported, or Band 41 can be supported.

sad-300x300.png

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, I question that, as I have not seen any official documentation.  And even if there is official documentation, I would call it baloney.

 

For me, I have standardized on 2600 MHz because it is closest to the center of the band.  Call it a happy medium.  But I definitely agree with Robert that people use 2500 MHz, 2600 MHz, 2.5 GHz, and 2.6 GHz all interchangeably.

 

AJ

Personally, I use 2.6GHz to refer to all three bands, but unofficially the official denotation for Band 41 is 2500. The official denotation for Band 7 is 2600, and Band 38 is undecided, though leaning toward 2500 as well (though handsets that support 2500/2600 are referring to Bands 38+7 being supported). Using frequency indicators is a rather annoying way to determine banding for devices, though...

 

Parts that support Bands 38+7 and 41 simultaneously are coming, though. Fairly soon, the frequency/band class thing may become merely an academic thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I like to think that I have a knack for sensible naming conventions.  I long ago decided on band 41 TD-LTE 2600, and I am sticking to it.

 

I used to refer to WiMAX 2500/2600 and BRS/EBS 2500/2600 MHz.  The problem with the latter, though, is that it sounded as if BRS is primarily 2500 MHz and EBS is primarily 2600 MHz.  However, the opposite is the case.  So, I had to choose, and 2600 MHz just made more sense.  Otherwise, a TD-LTE carrier could be at the high end of band 41, nearly 200 MHz removed from 2500 MHz, and that just would not make sense from a naming perspective.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or we can call it what I once heard Bob Azzi call it, "Two dot six."   :lol:

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got told that, as the Tri-Band S4 gets produced, it will start replacing the original S4 in inventory as it gets rolled out, and nobody will see a difference in packaging, etc. Somehow, this seems like a phenomenally bad idea. I also don't think it's true, as this was "water cooler" talk. Take it with a bucket of salt.

 

Its sounding like there is a possibility of a Sprint Galaxy S4 to support tri-band LTE?  I hope this is true but then again I don't know if Sprint has had any track record of releasing an updated version of a device.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is that it is actually a Note 3 being tested... maybe under the cover of GS4?

Maybe, maybe not. I though that Qualcomm was only in the US. Then again, I didn't do much research. I hear the 800 is a beast, though.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather see Sprint update the HTC One, and/or get an Optimus G Pro with tri-band LTE. 

I agree.  I'm feeling the One but I wouldn't want to get that and then not be able to use LTE 800 if it comes out in my area within 2 years.

 

I don't want to be a tester for first tri band device.  Ill wait a year just like most electronics they have to fix real field problems

That thought crossed my mind too.  I don't really want a repeat of the Evo LTE issues with my next phone.

Edited by Jaggrey
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to be a tester for first tri band device.  Ill wait a year just like most electronics they have to fix real field problems

Good idea there. I need to wait anyway I have a note 2 so it will be awhile before I can upgrade again.

 

I'm assuming we all mean 3 LTE bands not just PCS, 800 Mhz CDMA, and 2600 TDD LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

To further that link here is another showing it will support carrier aggregation.

 

http://www.geeky-gadgets.com/samsung-galaxy-s4-lte-advanced-with-snapdragon-800-processor-spotted-12-06-2013/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My upgrade is august 1....

 

I really hope a tri band is out by then.

 

And that its the active.

 

The active has a replaceable battery right? Is the processor same as the standard G4 or is it gimped?

 

Doubt it. The next flagship phones are due in oct and nov. I can upgrade now and it pains me that i have to wait until Oct for the note 3 since i want that tri-band lte support.

 

Sent from my Motorola Photon 4G using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saying, the last 2 years, Motorola has released a Sprint device around October, so we'll see if Google's ownership makes an impression on this year's device.  The last 2 years has been Motorola handling things, itself.

 

I'm expecting a late October/Early November for the next flagship.  May even be the Note III.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saying, the last 2 years, Motorola has released a Sprint device around October, so we'll see if Google's ownership makes an impression on this year's device. The last 2 years has been Motorola handling things, itself.

 

I'm expecting a late October/Early November for the next flagship. May even be the Note III.

 

The photon 4g actually hit stores in july.

 

Sent from my MB855 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...