Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Minnesota Market


CuriousTim

Recommended Posts

Been in Duluth since sunday(mini honeymoon as I just got married on Saturday) and I have had 4g everywhere that we have gone. Don't think I dropped to 3g once. And it's pretty speedy too. Won't have a chance to drive around d doing some mapping as I think the wife would kill me. Now sprint just needs to fix the drive up here as I quite often drop to 3g.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been in Duluth since sunday(mini honeymoon as I just got married on Saturday) and I have had 4g everywhere that we have gone. Don't think I dropped to 3g once. And it's pretty speedy too. Won't have a chance to drive around d doing some mapping as I think the wife would kill me. Now sprint just needs to fix the drive up here as I quite often drop to 3g.

Congratulations! On the seamless LTE experience and the wife! :)

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been in Duluth since sunday(mini honeymoon as I just got married on Saturday) and I have had 4g everywhere that we have gone. Don't think I dropped to 3g once. And it's pretty speedy too. Won't have a chance to drive around d doing some mapping as I think the wife would kill me. Now sprint just needs to fix the drive up here as I quite often drop to 3g.

 

Congrats on getting married buddy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been in Duluth since sunday(mini honeymoon as I just got married on Saturday) and I have had 4g everywhere that we have gone. Don't think I dropped to 3g once. And it's pretty speedy too. Won't have a chance to drive around d doing some mapping as I think the wife would kill me. Now sprint just needs to fix the drive up here as I quite often drop to 3g.

 

Congrats! Does the wife know about your cell tower addiction yet? :P

 

Did you spot any B41 while in Duluth? Or were you too busy. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations! On the seamless LTE experience and the wife! :)

 

Now, should the wife be seamless or not.  I am confused on that one.

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, should the wife be seamless or not. I am confused on that one.

 

;)

 

AJ

The wife was seamless as she didn't have anything with seams on. ;-)

 

Only saw band 26 and 25 when I checked. But this time last year only had about half as much coverage it seemed like.

 

And thanks for the congrats everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the Minneapolis suburbs and Sprint is the only good carrier out here.

 

I've got a Verizon Mifi pulling down 1-2mbps on LTE, ATT was unusable on the work phone (Wouldn't even catch a ping on LTE), and T-Mobile LTE was 2-4mbps on my iPad.

 

Sprint is at 25mbps in the same spots as the other 3 carriers. It's great being the underdog! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DAMN! I don't even believe it

2015_08_30_00_10_42.png

 

 

Meanwhile my home tower just sucks, even with a decent signal strength it's sooooo slow all the time. Grrrrr

2015_08_30_00_50_58.png

That top one is about what I got around the Maplewood mall a couple days ago.

 

Sent from my 0PJA2 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

We drove through Austin about a month ago, heading to Rochester. I really didn't have an issue until around 5 miles outside the city.

 

All the towers in Albert Lea, Waseca, Owatonna, Mankato, Fairbault and Rochester have 800mhz

radios, that why I was shocked that Austin didn't. It seems like a perfect place to use

800mhz service. I wonder why they don't have them installed?

Apparently this issue isn't completely resolved.  When I stopped at the westbound rest area east of Austin a couple of weeks ago I had no service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wish list for new towers in south central Minnesota

1. 5 miles east side and west of Austin, Mn - i90

2. Claremont, Mn - Hwy 14

3. Frost, Mn area - i90

4. Wells/Alden, Mn - i90

5. New Richland, Mn - Hwy 13

6. Janesville, Mn - Hwy 14

1 & 4 would be such a god send. Especially since there were Nextel towers exactly where you mentioned. Some day.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Had a trip from Twin Cities to Duluth and talk about a lot of 3G on Interstate 35. Sometimes went to roaming. Data at times was unusable. Hope they improve this soon.

Yeah, same on 169 from Mankato to intersection of 169 and 494. Thought this was supposed to be Sprint's better market. But, so far I'm not impressed.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, same on 169 from Mankato to intersection of 169 and 494. Thought this was supposed to be Sprint's better market. But, so far I'm not impressed.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

For the most part I get good service in the cities and I'm using a triband phone. They need to get good LTE along the Interstate.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Anyone in Minnesota finding any 2nd band 25 carriers anywhere. I think it might be possible up in Duluth. Not sure about anywhere else.

That's where Signal Check Pro shows the little 2 by the 25, right? I routinely see that in Eden Prairie, where I work.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's where Signal Check Pro shows the little 2 by the 25, right? I routinely see that in Eden Prairie, where I work.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Can you please grab a screenshot of SCP and your engineering screen along with your location?

 

Sent from my LG G4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Probably a lot of Midwest towers. Slight bias since Nebraska is a weird market, but there are tons of USCC sites that T-Mobile isn't yet co-located on. Think a similar situation in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Missouri. But some other markets, like yours, probably don't have that issue!
    • Sticky Customers - YES, and leave them flip to the T-Mobile PLMN when needed and they will be even more likely to Stick.
    • It seems to me that if the goal is to improve rural, the US Cellular buy-out would get them only part of the way there, considering there are plenty of rural areas that US Cellular does not serve.  But I also have a hard time reading it the way I think that article is, that the cost of this deal comes straight out of the $9 billion.  I mean, they're getting spectrum for their existing operations in US Cellular markets, including places that I wouldn't call rural.  (Roanoke, VA is the 9th largest city in the state, for example.)  It seems like some of it should be allocated to rural expansion, but certainly not the whole purchase price. There's also something to be said for getting the customer base of potentially sticky customers who have been used to US Cellular being the only game in town for potentially decades. - Trip
    • T-Mobile has stated 15% of their sites don't have 5g triband. In WV I know WISPs had a lot of 2.5GHz, but T-Mobile was trying to buy as much as possible. More rural FWA would be a big selling point that might overcome any soft bandwidth cap slight overages. Especially since UScellular likely started offering it on c-band.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...