Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - SF Bay Market

breakaes

By breakaes
in Markets

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

saywhatman
saywhatman

Very excited to see LTE underground on BART! I think they upgraded the DAS between Colma and SFO. I didn't get LTE underground anywhere else and the SINR was way too high to be coming from an abovegro

dbsynergy
dbsynergy

Got another B41 site with nearly maxed out speeds.   This is on Alameda near the Webster st tunnel.   Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk    

LuisBOSS302
LuisBOSS302

https://www.dropbox.com/s/u3w2arldxae8jfz/2014-06-01%2004.04.04.png   Hayward.

Posted Images

S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted
I did bush street in sf today.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Sounds dirty, when you type it.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 on Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

Uh oh. Ended up plotting LTE around some areas where it wasn't there, because my phone wouldn't drop it once it was out of range. I set it to LTE only via *#*#INFO#*#*.

 

http://sensorly.com/...an%20jose,%20ca

 

Thanks for the warning. We had a member in Puerto Rico report the same problem with the GNex before.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lilotimz Member Level: LTE Advanced

lilotimz

Posted
Posted

I live in Fairfield CA , my city launch LTE and coverage map on Sprint website show all my city with orange color. But nobody in here pick up LTE , only in freeway. Can you help us to tell us why no LTE here ? Check Sensorly and no coverage here , only in the area with nobody live there. Why Sprint troll customer like that ?

 

1st. We need to be able to comprehend what you're saying. Meaning. Proper English with correct grammar please.

2nd. Fairfield CA is LAUNCHING LTE meaning it's work in progress. Fairfield is part of the San Francisco bay area market and NV is in progress with loads of sites coming online each week throughout the entire market. They'll work when a site is ready for them to work on. No other reason about them being "slow".

3rd. Sprint is not trolling. If you want to complain about sprints LTE rollout, this is not the place to do it.

 

 

 

 

 

S4GRU Posting Guidelines (a.k.a. The Rulez)

 

Negative comments. Negative comments about Sprint and/or S4GRU are allowed. However, negative comments must be constructive in nature, relevant to the topic and the conversation, illustrate facts, be made rationally and intelligently and cannot have an attack tone. Rants will not be allowed. We do not host Sprint's complaints. Complaints about Sprint should be directed to their customer service channels.

 

http://s4gru.com/ind...-aka-the-rulez/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted
I live in Fairfield CA , my city launch LTE and coverage map on Sprint website show all my city with orange color. But nobody in here pick up LTE , only in freeway. Can you help us to tell us why no LTE here ? Check Sensorly and no coverage here , only in the area with nobody live there. Why Sprint troll customer like that ?

 

Sprint is trolling customers now? Nice.

 

Fairfield has half of its sites upgraded and the other half will be upgraded one at a time probably every few weeks. Some might say you are trolling our site.

 

Looking at Sensorly, there is quite a bit of coverage already in the Fairfield/Suisun area. And I bet not even half of it is mapped. I would suggest you get in you car, turn on your LTE and contribute to the Sensorly mapping in your community. I bet you would be pleasantly surprised how much coverage there actually is in your part of Solano County.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
mc_gusto Member Level: 4G WiMax

mc_gusto

Posted
Posted

Finally got lte along stretch of 101 on the northern part of sfo. Southern part still nada. The loop around the bay is almost complete. Just need that part of sfo, 880 near Dumbarton bridge and a tiny little part near 237 and 101 in mountain view.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
lilotimz Member Level: LTE Advanced

lilotimz

Posted
Posted

Can you send me the link to see the information about Hayward Ca? I donated already.

 

Check the Sponsor forums NV Site Completed thread and look at the NV progress map for Samsung. Then search for Hayward, CA and observe what's going on.

 

--> There's a couple towers up and running 3g/4g completed but nothing substantial yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kaixor Member Level: 1x Advanced

Kaixor

Posted
Posted

Been having an issue with connectivity in SF, I can't stay connected to EVDO with my iPhone 5, I've tried restoring, updating the carrier files and traveling around the city but no matter what happens, it will randomly drop me to 1x and texts/calls don't word while data does

Link to comment
Share on other sites
crazy_vag Member Level: eHRPD

crazy_vag

Posted
Posted

It's usually a sign of work in progress. Things should settle down in a few days. Then a week or so later, you might see LTE. However, with towers spaced as close as two blocks apart, you might be seeing a lot of flakyness. The site is predicting LTE launch for SF in February. While that might be optimistic, there's still much work left to be done. Where exactly in SF are you having problems?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Paynefanbro
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • schmidtj
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By schmidtj · Posted

      5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • RedSpark
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By RedSpark · Posted

      Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • dkyeager
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • RedSpark
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By RedSpark · Posted

      Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...