Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - SF Bay Market


breakaes

Recommended Posts

1x800 in SF too. No signs of CSFB yet though, so still no LTE for tri-band handsets.

 

Posted Image

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Where in sf did you get 800? I get it routinely in sf but the signal comes from Daly City for me.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple blocks from Ghirardelli Square.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

My guess is that's a signal from the other side of the bay, probably Albany or Sausalito. Your Ec/Io is pretty terrible in that screenshot.

 

Were you just visiting or are you from there? I don't have a table of SID NID BID like some others here do, so I can't tell you what tower you are connected to.

 

If you want to see which tower you are connected to, this is a decent app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.parizene.netmonitor&hl=en The geo locations are not usually 100% accurate, but they give you a rough idea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been getting HD Voice with a friend here in the bay who owns a G2 and it sounds amazing. FYI it doesn't always connect the first call. I will be connected for a few seconds and the call will go silentt w/o HD. Then I hang up and call back and HD will be engaged. Not sure if this is just a glitch between phones or the network here in the bay. Only an observation at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Nice huge 800 update today. Too bad nothing for sf proper. I was in diamond Heights in sf near twin peaks and I got 800 1x from Oakland and Alameda. 3 different towers.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

is 800 still spotty in that area? When I was in Hayward and Union City I struggled to maintain 800 but LTE was really good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is 800 still spotty in that area? When I was in Hayward and Union City I struggled to maintain 800 but LTE was really good.

No site in the city of San Francisco is 800 accepted yet. So I mainly get 800 1x from the south in daly city. Today is the first time I got it from the East bay. Well at least that I noticed. The market as a whole got hundreds of 800 1x sites accepted today. South Bay too. But none in sf.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No site in the city of San Francisco is 800 accepted yet. So I mainly get 800 1x from the south in daly city. Today is the first time I got it from the East bay. Well at least that I noticed. The market as a whole got hundreds of 800 1x sites accepted today. South Bay too. But none in sf.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

I haven't connected to any sites in the south bay. Was in San Jose yesterday for hours and nothing. Not even on the drive on 680 south and north. I only get 800 when i'm in the Bart station in Livermore or at some relatives in Union City and Hayward.

 

The bay area except for SF and Palo Alto is coming along pretty nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't connected to any sites in the south bay. Was in San Jose yesterday for hours and nothing. Not even on the drive on 680 south and north. I only get 800 when i'm in the Bart station in Livermore or at some relatives in Union City and Hayward.

 

The bay area except for SF and Palo Alto is coming along pretty nice.

You're only gonna connect to 800 when you lose weight 1900. Unless you force it with a prl update or some other method.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The bay area except for SF and Palo Alto is coming along pretty nice.

And Berkeley.

 

But it does look pretty nice. Once they cluster launch sf it'll be great. Hope it's soon.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it might be soon. Over the last couple days, my phone has spent a considerable amount of time on 1X. My hope is that they are testing the EVDO equipment.

 

Yesterday morning the Bay Bridge was all 1X and kicked on EVDO when I got into the city. Then in the evening the reverse was true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judging by how long it took other markets to progress, I doubt SF, PAMPA (Palo Alto, Menlo Park, Atherton) and Berkeley can just be flipped on.  Maybe Robert can comment, but I think it's unlikely many sites would flip from brown (no NV), to green (3G/800/LTE).  I'd imagine a minimum of 6 months at the earliest before SF could be announced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judging by how long it took other markets to progress, I doubt SF, PAMPA (Palo Alto, Menlo Park, Atherton) and Berkeley can just be flipped on.  Maybe Robert can comment, but I think it's unlikely many sites would flip from brown (no NV), to green (3G/800/LTE).  I'd imagine a minimum of 6 months at the earliest before SF could be announced.

 

You're basically correct.  Except that with Samsung, they started a push in early Fall working on getting the hardware installed at all sites in their areas.  We have seen huge clusters of Samsung sites go live.

 

Usually what happens with these new Samsung clusters is all the 3G is turned on at once.  Then they go back and fire up all the LTE at sites that also have upgraded backhaul.  Then they pick up all the remaining sites one at a time as backhaul arrives.

 

However, the City/County of San Francisco may not be a cluster launch this way.  It seems there is something else holding up everything there.  Getting Band 41 fired up there will help a lot.  But even that is not happening in a big way.  It almost feels like a Doctor Who episode.  As if there is some alien villain living off the Sprint network that prevents it from being upgraded.

 

doctor-who.jpg

 

If the Tardis shows up, maybe it's a sign that the Sprint San Francisco problem may soon be nigh.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it might be soon. Over the last couple days, my phone has spent a considerable amount of time on 1X. My hope is that they are testing the EVDO equipment.

 

Yesterday morning the Bay Bridge was all 1X and kicked on EVDO when I got into the city. Then in the evening the reverse was true. 

 

If I understand you correctly, I think you are saying that your reception is sooo bad that they must have something up their sleeve for the better?  I'm not sure if I disagree with that statement but I find it comical (I think the same way) that it is so bad, that it must be because something really good is going to happen. 

 

I hope you're right.  I'm a few weeks away from switching to TMO since they pay my ETF now.  Still would not want to but I really have no choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I understand you correctly, I think you are saying that your reception is sooo bad that they must have something up their sleeve for the better?  I'm not sure if I disagree with that statement but I find it comical (I think the same way) that it is so bad, that it must be because something really good is going to happen. 

 

I hope you're right.  I'm a few weeks away from switching to TMO since they pay my ETF now.  Still would not want to but I really have no choice.

 

I used a tmobile SIM for a couple months to try out their network. It's pretty good in SF however I did have some problems with it when visiting family out of town and I had zero signal on a while traveling I-5 on a road trip I did to Las Vegas last week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used a tmobile SIM for a couple months to try out their network. It's pretty good in SF however I did have some problems with it when visiting family out of town and I had zero signal on a while traveling I-5 on a road trip I did to Las Vegas last week. 

 

T-Mobile should be called MetroPCS becuase their network stops to be useable outsite any major metro area. MetroPCS had LA to LV covered with their slow 4GLTE but Tmo has not been able to convert it along the I-15 yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used a tmobile SIM for a couple months to try out their network. It's pretty good in SF however I did have some problems with it when visiting family out of town and I had zero signal on a while traveling I-5 on a road trip I did to Las Vegas last week. 

That's one thing I think about when switching which is why I haven't switched so already.  I would argue that although Sprint has service in all areas, at times it's as useful as having no service at all.  I was on a phone call from San Fran to the airport and was disconnected 4 times on 280/101.  Very frustrating...maybe I should go to the evil ATT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's one thing I think about when switching which is why I haven't switched so already.  I would argue that although Sprint has service in all areas, at times it's as useful as having no service at all.  I was on a phone call from San Fran to the airport and was disconnected 4 times on 280/101.  Very frustrating...maybe I should go to the evil ATT.

 

Don't give up so fast.  Your call was dropped most likely because of Sprint's aggressive, yet seemingly random tower upgrades being performed in SF and its neighboring cities.  One of the drawbacks of the 'Network Vision' investment is the incompatibility of seamless call transfers from a cell tower with old equipment to one that has been upgraded.  Your call was most likely dropped from SF to Daly City and then from Daly City to South SF.  Just hang in there. In the end, we're still getting a much better bang for our buck than ATT subscribers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just connected to another 1x 800 about 2 miles north of the last one on noriega and 33rd. This might be the real thing folks!

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

Let's hope! That first one is already accepted with NV equipment, so it may just be they finally flipped 800 on, or you finally were able to connect. Is the second site also accepted already? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...