Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

I think that's the part that's NV-related. I couldn't keep the 4G connection to save my life while nearby towers were being upgraded. Thing is, I had the same behavior on the stock Touchwiz ROM, except it held the 3G connection fine. It just didn't stay connected to 4G. So, it was no different for me on TW or CM except that CM wouldn't hold the 3G connection.

 

That is strange. I didn't have much of a problem holding an LTE connection on TW, but I can't get one at all on AOSP anymore. It's like the handoff is totally borked for some reason. Would it have anything to do with the 800mhz band Sprint's implementing as well? Maybe it was working fine for the towers that didn't have this piece, but as soon as they added it (which they have done to a few towers around my area) that's what's causing the issue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only downside to LTE coming live in Chicagoland is the traffic on this post is getting less and less exciting. I'm still waiting/hoping for some LTE love in DeKalb and the loop to get saturated with it. That keeps me active in Sensorly and on this site!

 

Anyone seeing anything in Rochelle' date=' Ottawa, or anything near DeKalb yet?[/quote']

 

Nothing in DeKalb, no backhaul or radios installed yet. Just cabinets.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're all not going to believe this' date=' but I got 49.35 down and 18.6 up at Orleans and Chicago downtown.

not lying have the speed test to prove it.

WOW.

JUST WOW.[/quote']

 

It's not possible. It's a problem with your speed test. It cannot be faster than 37.5Mbps. I would occasionally get 40Mbps speed test results. But those aren't possible either.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

(NOOB)

 

FWIW,

Just got LG Optimus G today from Sprint store at Clark and Division. They said no 4G there but maybe over on State street. My apt is at Clark and Schiller. 5 bars of LTE even though Sensorly says nothing there. Speed Test: 13.5Mbps down, 10.2Mbps up.

 

I was worried about losing WiMax speeds and maybe having to go WiFi at home, but looks like I've got LTE. (Either that or I'm a blithering idiot, which is a distinct possibility...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(NOOB)

 

FWIW,

Just got LG Optimus G today from Sprint store at Clark and Division. They said no 4G there but maybe over on State street. My apt is at Clark and Schiller. 5 bars of LTE even though Sensorly says nothing there. Speed Test: 13.5Mbps down, 10.2Mbps up.

 

I was worried about losing WiMax speeds and maybe having to go WiFi at home, but looks like I've got LTE. (Either that or I'm a blithering idiot, which is a distinct possibility...)

 

Well, you should be using WiFi at home, regardless of your cellular connection-

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2062-debate-on-whether-you-should-offload-smartphone-data-on-wifi-even-though-you-pay-for-unlimited/

 

As for "bars of LTE"-

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2040-bars-lie-for-lte-signal-strength-how-to-determine-your-actual-lte-signal-strength/

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

(NOOB)

 

FWIW,

Just got LG Optimus G today from Sprint store at Clark and Division. They said no 4G there but maybe over on State street. My apt is at Clark and Schiller. 5 bars of LTE even though Sensorly says nothing there. Speed Test: 13.5Mbps down, 10.2Mbps up.

 

I was worried about losing WiMax speeds and maybe having to go WiFi at home, but looks like I've got LTE. (Either that or I'm a blithering idiot, which is a distinct possibility...)

 

Well map it on sensorly then lol

 

Sent from my White Epic 4g Touch using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never dawned on me for that on WiFi at home. Figured SE plan actually meant unlimited. But easily rectified with an NFC tag in the house.

 

As to the LTE bars, followed that sequence. -86dBm. Pretty much puts me in "very good" signal...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never dawned on me for that on WiFi at home. Figured SE plan actually meant unlimited. But easily rectified with an NFC tag in the house.

 

As to the LTE bars' date=' followed that sequence. -86dBm. Pretty much puts me in "very good" signal...[/quote']

 

That is a very strong signal.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert,

FYI, you may want to edit that LTE bars post for the Optimus G. The keystroke sequence is the same for the Opitmus G as the EVO,Viper,PHOTON Q.

And apparently the Optimus G's 4g icon applies to data and not just voice (like the iPhone5). (The manual says the icon is for data also).

 

Again, all this is prefaced by being a "NOOB". (legal disclaimer for anything I post could be total nonsense and I cannot be sued or held accountable for it.) :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey everyone, just wanted to apologize to sg4ru and especially robert for a comment I made a month ago on this thread. I was a bit inebriated and just so frustrated that I said some things that I really regret. If it was not for this site, the wonderful people on it, and Robert keeping it going, I would have gone crazy and changed my carriers a long time ago. I just wanted to apologize and thank everyone for keeping this site going and making us some of the most informed customers in any industry.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert' date='

FYI, you may want to edit that LTE bars post for the Optimus G. The keystroke sequence is the same for the Opitmus G as the EVO,Viper,PHOTON Q.

And apparently the Optimus G's 4g icon applies to data and not just voice (like the iPhone5). (The manual says the icon is for data also).

 

Again, all this is prefaced by being a "NOOB". (legal disclaimer for anything I post could be total nonsense and I cannot be sued or held accountable for it.) :)[/quote']

 

That will be great if it does. If it does show the LTE signal, it will be the first Sprint Android device to do it.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is not incorrect. Your two comments are not conflicting. It is true to say that the "holes" have not been mapped, and also to say that service in the Loop is still spotty. Not even one quarter of all the Loop sites have been converted to 3G/4G.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

 

This is true I have yet to receive 4G service anywhere in the loop outside of LSD. I work near Jackson/Wells, no 4G anywhere near there or even down Jackson toward State. 3G is rather slow and under performing as well, I assume and hope its due to NV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ahve noticed most of the sites in the north suburbs from des plaines to glencoe that have accepted 4g have microwave backhaul. or atleast the equiptment for them and the ones that are still not accpeted seem to not have microwave antennas on them and are probably waiting for backhaul.

 

 

ALSO i have noticed that in the last few weeks my 1x connection over the same area has gone from connecting to 800 smr channel 10 first to connecting to 1900 (right?) band 375 first. i have only connected to smr 800 once since i noticed this and that was inside a building.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ahve noticed most of the sites in the north suburbs from des plaines to glencoe that have accepted 4g have microwave backhaul. or atleast the equiptment for them and the ones that are still not accpeted seem to not have microwave antennas on them and are probably waiting for backhaul.

 

 

ALSO i have noticed that in the last few weeks my 1x connection over the same area has gone from connecting to 800 smr channel 10 first to connecting to 1900 (right?) band 375 first. i have only connected to smr 800 once since i noticed this and that was inside a building.

 

I believe Digiblur said recently that most of the Sprint PRL updates recently removed Chicago 800 Voice capability again. This may be why. It's probably a temporary measure.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I crazy or has LTE deployment seriously slowed down? It seemed like it was lighting up all over the place a month ago. I know they're 70% complete in Chicagoland, but I should think the vast majority or remaining sites is in the city...between all the dead zones and having an EVO Lte, I'm on 4G pretty much never. Does anybody know what's going on? I'm hoping their plan wasn't to get to 70% in a given market and then send resources elsewhere only to fill in holes later...it's all holes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I crazy or has LTE deployment seriously slowed down? It seemed like it was lighting up all over the place a month ago. I know they're 70% complete in Chicagoland, but I should think the vast majority or remaining sites is in the city...between all the dead zones and having an EVO Lte, I'm on 4G pretty much never. Does anybody know what's going on? I'm hoping their plan wasn't to get to 70% in a given market and then send resources elsewhere only to fill in holes later...it's all holes!

 

I made a comment like this earlier, I think in this same thread. I was hoping that when they got to a certain percentage, they would stick it out until it's done. Hopefully they don't have a "good enough" number and roll with it that way, and as you said, move resources along. I know they updated a lot of towers in Chicago proper to LTE as evidenced by the map in the sponsors section, but I'd like to see more upgrades than just LTE. NV, in it's initial intent, was about more than simply rolling out LTE and I think Sprint should stick with it.

 

Part of your issue though is that EVO, it's horrid for LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I crazy or has LTE deployment seriously slowed down? It seemed like it was lighting up all over the place a month ago. I know they're 70% complete in Chicagoland, but I should think the vast majority or remaining sites is in the city...between all the dead zones and having an EVO Lte, I'm on 4G pretty much never. Does anybody know what's going on? I'm hoping their plan wasn't to get to 70% in a given market and then send resources elsewhere only to fill in holes later...it's all holes!

 

I think that only about 44% of the towers in the Chicagoland area are transmitting LTE right now. 70% of the towers have had NV work done on them, but that doesn’t mean LTE has been activated on those towers yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Work is still ongoing in Chicago. I wouldn't call a production rate of 30+ sites per week stopping. That's still 120+ per month. It's still going.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I believe Digiblur said recently that most of the Sprint PRL updates recently removed Chicago 800 Voice capability again. This may be why. It's probably a temporary measure.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

Only 24009 and 25009 has them now.

 

Sent from my EVO sometimes-LTE

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a quick question for those with the EVO LTE.

 

I'm still on 1.13.651...

 

I've been holding out on updating because I like keeping my options open for root access/unlocked bootloader. I rooted like last week just to test some things out and to put Google Now on my phone.

 

If you have this phone on the latest firmware are you connecting to LTE more consistently? I know I have LTE in my neighborhood but it's just a chore to connect to it consistently. I'll update to the latest firmware if it will improve my connection.

 

If nothing else works, I'm going to go to Sprint and try to get the phone exchanged for the GS3. There's a Sprint store in my town that gets great LTE coverage so I figure if I show them side by side how my phone isn't connecting like the GS3 is or iPhone then that should be a good start to getting the GS3.

 

Wish me luck

Edited by LTEKen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Only 24009 and 25009 has them now.

 

Sent from my EVO sometimes-LTE

Is there a newer PRL than 24009 for the S3? I just tried a manual update and that's what it left me with.

 

Does the PRL impact accessing 4G? Or is that something that is auto negotiated with the tower?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Was at the Yankees vs Tigers game today and besides being a terrible day to have good seats, T-Mobile had great speeds via the stadium's DAS. I consistently saw 500-600Mbps on 5G and on LTE I got upwards of 200Mbps. I noticed that the stadiums DAS is broadcasting 140MHz n41 while macros that surround the stadium are at 80MHz. 
    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...