Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

 

Soon, most of us will be saying you are lucky too. The Western exurbs were really bad at one point, but most of their problems have been worked through. It is a painful process, but it will be worked out over the next weeks/months and you will then be on of the most state of the art networks ever. You will have 18 months of a great network in Chicago before they even start my market.

 

Robert

 

I love my ns4g but as soon as lte comes I'm getting a sgs3 asap ;)

 

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just got 4g in Naperville at 87th and Route 59. Impressive speeds!!!

 

Im hoping a lot of these towers go active and stay active so close to the LTE 15th launch date.....

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just got 4g in Naperville at 87th and Route 59. Impressive speeds!!! I will post screenshot when I get home. Say file is too big

 

No go in Winfield/Wheaton/West Chicago here. Also nothing in Lincoln Park. You got me excited, but this is interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No go in Winfield/Wheaton/West Chicago here. Also nothing in Lincoln Park. You got me excited' date=' but this is interesting.[/quote']

 

Damn....thats my work area.... :-(

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

this was at 95th and 59 in Naperville. Had a full signal will a 54ms ping. Files to big to upload from my phone for the screenshot

 

Can you try to test the tower by Eola and Hafenrichter roads? I'm curious if LTE is live over here. 95th and 59 is like 5 mins from that intersection, so I wonder if tower CH03XC684 is live on LTE as well.

 

Sent from my JB iPhone 4S using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stupid question....but are these towers STAYING live??!

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

 

I doubt it. I'm willing to bet what's happened in other markets where LTE will be up a while, then block the general public will happen here.

 

Sent from my JB iPhone 4S using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Can you try to test the tower by Eola and Hafenrichter roads? I'm curious if LTE is live over here. 95th and 59 is like 5 mins from that intersection, so I wonder if tower CH03XC684 is live on LTE as well.

 

Sent from my JB iPhone 4S using Forum Runner

 

Ya ill test it Monday I work right by there

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been all over Naperville, Lisle, Wheaton, Winfield, Carol Stream, Batavia, and Aurora over the past 2 days and have not seen any 4G at all. And believe me I'm constantly checking and running speedtests.

 

I am, however, seeing a huge disparity in 3g speeds. There is no middle ground, it's either dial-up speeds, or 1mbps+ speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you try to test the tower by Eola and Hafenrichter roads? I'm curious if LTE is live over here. 95th and 59 is like 5 mins from that intersection, so I wonder if tower CH03XC684 is live on LTE as well.

 

Sent from my JB iPhone 4S using Forum Runner

 

I live right over there and according to my Netmonitor app I'm connected to that tower right now. Its signal type is "EvDo rev.A". I don't have an LTE phone, but I had thought the tower had to have an eHRPD signal to get LTE. I could be wrong though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live right over there and according to my Netmonitor app I'm connected to that tower right now. Its signal type is "EvDo rev.A". I don't have an LTE phone, but I had thought the tower had to have an eHRPD signal to get LTE. I could be wrong though.

 

From what I've seen in other threads, you have to have an LTE phone to show that you're connected to eHRPD. I'm not 100% certain, but that was my understanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live right over there and according to my Netmonitor app I'm connected to that tower right now. Its signal type is "EvDo rev.A". I don't have an LTE phone, but I had thought the tower had to have an eHRPD signal to get LTE. I could be wrong though.

From what I've seen in other threads, you have to have an LTE phone to show that you're connected to eHRPD. I'm not 100% certain, but that was my understanding.

 

Yes, eHRPD will only show up on LTE phones. Legacy devices will continue to see EVDO for their 3G. LTE devices will see eHRPD because once the connection hits the tower, it is routed through the LTE switch for smooth handoffs to LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for anyone who wants to have 4g for a little while, from 95th street all the way to 34 on Route 59 in Naperville, it's still on as of last night. averaged 18 mbps for approximately 10 speedtests when I went to my storage unit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? That's a ton of hassle.

 

Roam Control - force roam for free.

 

If they boot you because of excess roaming (which I doubt) then you will be ETF free. Port your number for free.

 

Why go prepaid to go onto another carrier when you can just force roam 100% free?

 

Just an FYI. They can force you to pay the ETF for force roaming. Check your contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not seen any examples of this.

 

Just because they don't exercise their right to do so, doesn't mean they can't. It's more of a PSA than anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because they don't exercise their right to do so, doesn't mean they can't. It's more of a PSA than anything.

 

The way I've been reading about people abusing this lately, I think they should start enforcing the ETF.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...