Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Sprint can say they are the fastest in Huston in download. T-Mobile on the other hand...beb8a64093065fbf8ad0b11aa7525b65.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Download speed is what counts anyway..  :D

 

But apparently not when those results are from Rootmetrics.  The more reliable results come from a random person in New York who cherry picks locations and does speedtests on rooftops next to T-Mobile sites.  Because that's more representative of real world results rather than the thousands of tests within a city that Rootmetrics performs.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint median download is over 20 in every RootMetrics test. Looks like the days of the slower network are over. Now the ice on the cake will be the densification of every market.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"binge on" ;)

Hmm, even if it's wideband.. Seems like T-Mobile has issues keeping up with the recently announced video streaming offer.

 

Always note the testing period.  Even though BingeOn has been a thing for a month and the RootMetrics results are announced now, the testing took place before BingeOn.  That could be good news or bad news for T-Mobile.  If HD video streaming was hammering its downlink prior to BingeOn, then performance already could be improved with BingeOn.  But if HD video streaming was not the major culprit and/or much more SD video streaming is happening under BingeOn, then T-Mobile is in a world of hurt.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint tied for first with Verizon and AT&T in Houston.

 

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/houston-tx/2015/2H

 

Sprint has a noticeable lead over all the others in median download speeds.

 

This definitely validates the Sprint experience I have had in Houston.  IMO, the network felt as strong, if not stronger, than what I experience in Chicago.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What stinks is someone will look at the running totals (95 V / 49 A / 16 T / S 5) and think that ohh look at that, Sprint still sucks, look at how much worse they are than Verizon.

 

Yet dig deeper, there are exceptions, but Sprint has made great strides in most markets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint tied for first with Verizon and AT&T in Houston.

 

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/houston-tx/2015/2H

 

Sprint has a noticeable lead over all the others in median download speeds.

Sprint has made strides in Houston. Good for them.

 

Sent from my SM-N910T

Edited by Houston_Texas
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This definitely validates the Sprint experience I have had in Houston. IMO, the network felt as strong, if not stronger, than what I experience in Chicago.

The latest results probably have more to do with them finally fixing the load balancing issues where a phone would stay stuck onto B26 even with B41 available. Don't get me wrong, Sprint is the most improved but they still have issues like these from time to time...

 

Srmye3wl.jpg

 

Band 41 bandwidth probably helped Sprint, but I'd like to know how much of Rootmetric's report is based on indoor tests since Clearwire equipment has a hard time penetrating the thinnest sheetrock walls. I occasionally see decent speeds now that balancing issues have been ironed out, but nothing above 7 Mbps in indoor environments on heavy usage hours. Outdoors, Sprint goes toe to toe with T-Mobile with each averaging about 18-25 Mbps (Sprint pulling ahead most of the times, and smoking magenta with a CA phone). But indoors, advantage T-Mobile most of the time.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The latest results probably have more to do with them finally fixing the load balancing issues where a phone would stay stuck onto B26 even with B41 available. Don't get me wrong, Sprint is the most improved but they still have issues like these from time to time...Srmye3wl.jpg

Band 41 bandwidth probably helped Sprint, but I'd like to know how much of Rootmetric's report is based on indoor tests since Clearwire equipment has a hard time penetrating the thinnest sheetrock walls. I occasionally see decent speeds now that balancing issues have been ironed out, but nothing above 7 Mbps in indoor environments on heavy usage hours. Outdoors, Sprint goes toe to toe with T-Mobile with each averaging about 18-25 Mbps (Sprint pulling ahead most of the times, and smoking magenta with a CA phone). But indoors, advantage T-Mobile most of the time.

From Rootmetric's Houston report:

114 indoor locations.

62k+ total tests but that's indoors and outdoors.

 

Reading Sprints press release about the Houston results also looks like Sprint focused on improving indoor high traffic areas like downtown, both airports, malls like Galleria, and many other locations. Can't wait till they start the densification project because Houston always gets great treatment from Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The latest results probably have more to do with them finally fixing the load balancing issues where a phone would stay stuck onto B26 even with B41 available. Don't get me wrong, Sprint is the most improved but they still have issues like these from time to time...

 

Srmye3wl.jpg

 

Band 41 bandwidth probably helped Sprint, but I'd like to know how much of Rootmetric's report is based on indoor tests since Clearwire equipment has a hard time penetrating the thinnest sheetrock walls. I occasionally see decent speeds now that balancing issues have been ironed out, but nothing above 7 Mbps in indoor environments on heavy usage hours. Outdoors, Sprint goes toe to toe with T-Mobile with each averaging about 18-25 Mbps (Sprint pulling ahead most of the times, and smoking magenta with a CA phone). But indoors, advantage T-Mobile most of the time.

I'm about 3 miles from the Galleria. Speeds are around 5mbps.

 

Sent from my SM-N910T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Rootmetric's Houston report:

114 indoor locations.

62k+ total tests but that's indoors and outdoors.

 

Reading Sprints press release about the Houston results also looks like Sprint focused on improving indoor high traffic areas like downtown, both airports, malls like Galleria, and many other locations. Can't wait till they start the densification project because Houston always gets great treatment from Sprint.

 

When I am in Houston, I stay at the Royal Sonesta near the Galleria and am working short walk from San Felipe and Sage Rd.  I drop to 3G in the elevators but that is about it.  I'll say it like this - I do not experience enough issue with cell service where I find it necessary to run a speed test.  *shrug*  It just works.  I'm going back a few weeks in Jan, so I'll run some speed tests just because I'm now curious.

 

With as many offices, hotels, and other buildings as there are in the area, along with frequently snarled traffic on 610, I'm actually a little surprised that things seem to perform as well as they do.  I do my part and grab wifi when available.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the new excuse: since VoLTE isn't tested by Root, that also means that their new Extended Range LTE assets are not fully tested when it comes to voice. You're going to hear a lot more of that in the coming weeks and months.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the new excuse: since VoLTE isn't tested by Root, that also means that their new Extended Range LTE assets are not fully tested when it comes to voice. You're going to hear a lot more of that in the coming weeks and months.

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Not using a band 12 device was the excuse last go around. Last time I checked root was using a b12 phone. As far as the calling goes it's a fundamental feature(non volte)there's no reason for tmobile to come in dead last in just about every city

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it kind of ironic that Verizon is buying ads on Ookla to tell the world how good they are on RootMetrics? After all, if Ookla was so superior, why would they be doing that? [emoji6]

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

I paid the .99 cents just to get that annoying ass ad off my phone. I've had a few friends say "dang Verizon's LTE is that fast here" just because they glanced and saw that ad and assumed it was Verizon. I would have to correct them that it was Sprint not Verizon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...since VoLTE isn't tested by Root, that also means that their new Extended Range LTE assets are not fully tested when it comes to voice.

How is that not true? If you are being served by a Band 12 cell site (and no others), you can only place a call if VoLTE is turned on. Having VoLTE off is going to kill their "call blocking" statistics.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is that not true? If you are being served by a Band 12 cell site (and no others), you can only place a call if VoLTE is turned on. Having VoLTE off is going to kill their "call blocking" statistics.

Where did I say that was false?

 

While I'm editing this, I might as well mention that we have no idea where T-Mobile VoLTE reliability is at since no third parties are measuring that nationally and I don't have access to VoLTE stats that T-Mobile has internally.

 

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although my call block rate is higher on VoLTE than it is on WCDMA using T-Mobile here in South Dakota. It's getting to the point that at least 1/3 of my VoLTE calls won't go through or take 30 seconds+ to connect on VoLTE. Whereas it seems to be an uncommon occurrence on WCDMA. However, I'm in an active deployment area with many B12 only sites, so I'm just chalking it up to that for now.

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...