Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I have to subscribe to read that article.  What does the article talk about?

merger between T-Mobile & Sprint the owner of Softbank just talked about this 5 hrs ago inbox me I screened shot the whole thing & I will email it to you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is pretty awesome. I've been waiting for this. Doesn't ATL only have 30MHz on PCS?

I don't know the answer. Going by Spectrum Omega they don't have the C block. I believe it's A block.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is pretty awesome. I've been waiting for this. Doesn't ATL only have 30MHz on PCS?

Spectrum omega shows A,G,D,B blocks in Atlanta

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would rather see Sprint become Softbank USA. After the network improves even more.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

I would much rather see 4 national carriers instead of 3.  Just the thought about how much divestiture in spectrum that needs to be made in order to get this to past regulators is staggering.  I would much rather see Sprint partner up with a cable company or something.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would rather see Sprint become Softbank USA. After the network improves even more.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

At one point long time ago, this was discussed here on S4GRU where I was in agreement of this, until one of the members brought up a very good point about Americans not taking well to the name "bank" as part of a wireless carrier's name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Windstream sucks. are you sure it's actually fiber to home -or- fiber to 'almost' home?

 

I've got a big box that says it's an ONT on the side of my house with battery backup and it's plugged in, so I assume it's FTTH - copper wouldn't need all that, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Americans not taking well to the name "bank" as part of a wireless carrier's name.

Well, they aren't taking the name "Sprint" very well at this point either. The sad truth is that Sprint has become synonymous with "slow" and "bad". The Sprint Spark era didn't help matters either. So many Android phones incorrectly showed 1 bar of signal anytime the phone fell below -99 RSRP. That left a lot of people with a bad taste in their mouth.

 

A total rebranding may be in order. At the very least, Sprint needs to change their logo, font, color, slogan and anything that remotely ties them to the 2011-2015 era.

Edited by greenbastard
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't even waste the money on a rebrand. It would get slaughtered. The press and critics would say same people same network quality as yesterday and don't fall for a new name.

 

Once the network gets to s certain point with b41 and ca and so forth then I would be all for it. Only way to rebrand now and sell it is another company merging or buying sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, they aren't taking the name "Sprint" very well at this point either. The sad truth is that Sprint has become synonymous with "slow" and "bad". The Sprint Spark era didn't help matters either. So many Android phones incorrectly showed 1 bar of signal anytime the phone fell below -99 RSRP. That left a lot of people with a bad taste in their mouth.

 

A total rebranding may be in order. At the very least, Sprint needs to change their logo, font, color, slogan and anything that remotely ties them to the 2011-2015 era.

 

Open Mobile. Use the name from the Puerto Rico Company they purchased. They have a great logo too!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, they aren't taking the name "Sprint" very well at this point either. The sad truth is that Sprint has become synonymous with "slow" and "bad". The Sprint Spark era didn't help matters either. So many Android phones incorrectly showed 1 bar of signal anytime the phone fell below -99 RSRP. That left a lot of people with a bad taste in their mouth.

 

A total rebranding may be in order. At the very least, Sprint needs to change their logo, font, color, slogan and anything that remotely ties them to the 2011-2015 era.

I completely agree with you, greenbastard. Something needs to be done regarding Sprint's PR perception regarding the negative reputation its past has had on it. I've been promoting the urgency of a name change for Sprint here on S4GRU for a long time, but I question myself if now really is the right time for a name change, and thinking that its probably better they haven't yet changed the name, despite that I believe Sprint eventually needs one.

 

The problem with the name change happening right now, is that Sprint ought to first deploy and densify, then start seeing great improvement in their reports first, then begin the rebranding process. This all sounds more like its going to be delayed even further though, because according to TmoNews, Masayoshi Son is going to begin pursuing the merger process with T-Mobile, seemingly starting with getting positive signs from Ajit Pai and the others at the FCC, then make his next move.

 

I know I've been pretty negative about this merger possibility, and in hoping DT gets Dish for T-Mobile, which I still believe is more likely to happen at this point. However, I'm beginning to be a bit more appreciative of Sprint again seeing their recent reports on Lombard, which is very closeby to me and I travel there pretty often. The other thing is, I'm always pretty irritated by John Legere, but his latest attacking of unhappy customers on his Twitter account, which is really is upsetting to me that I'm essentially supporting this by paying for T-Mobile service, has me hoping DT changes its mind about keeping T-Mobile US and sells it to Sprint. At least Marcelo is professional towards customers, rather than acting like a selfish, arrogant bully as Legere does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would much rather see 4 national carriers instead of 3. Just the thought about how much divestiture in spectrum that needs to be made in order to get this to past regulators is staggering. I would much rather see Sprint partner up with a cable company or something.

I agree. I think Sprint and a cable company would be good for each other. Even despite how much I despise the cable companies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tmobile-sprint-dish. Said company would be able to compete with tradition wired ISPs. This would be my dream. Cable companies are regional, so a tie up with one of them would be really good in some areas and not so exciting for most of the country.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Open Mobile. Use the name from the Puerto Rico Company they purchased. They have a great logo too!

Logo looks nice, 

Open-mobile-logo.jpg

 

I'm thinking if they ever are going to change the name, then make it reference the main asset they have. Spectrum. But since Charter has a hold on it, I figure maybe something along those lines.

Spectre, Spectracom, Continuum, Gigacom come to mind. Or just leave it since who ever takes over will change it to whatever suits them anyway.

 

TS

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got a big box that says it's an ONT on the side of my house with battery backup and it's plugged in, so I assume it's FTTH - copper wouldn't need all that, no?

ya you wouldn't think. windstream is so shady though so you never know with them...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't even waste the money on a rebrand. It would get slaughtered. Same people same network don't fall for a new name.

 

Once the network gets to s certain point with b41 and ca and so forth then I would be all for it. Only way to rebrand now and sell it is another company merging or buying sprint.

Only problem it's not same people. 2011-2014 wasn't Marcelo. So 2015 he was just starting.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any new name Sprint might change to, if not for Softbank US, I think they ought to drop the "S" from the beginning of the name. However, despite my being in agreement that the word "bank" being odd here in the US, I believe they might change it to that, in order to have naming synergy with the main company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only problem it's not same people. 2011-2014 wasn't Marcelo. So 2015 he was just starting.

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

 

I am fully aware of that. My point was people would think it's the same. I will edit my post so to reflect thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't even waste the money on a rebrand. It would get slaughtered. The press and critics would say same people same network quality as yesterday and don't fall for a new name.

 

Once the network gets to s certain point with b41 and ca and so forth then I would be all for it. Only way to rebrand now and sell it is another company merging or buying sprint.

 

 

I agree. I don't think it makes any sense to do a rebrand.

Rebranding doesn't work as well as it used to. People are now able to see right through it.

 

Look at Comcast which has tried to become Xfinity. People still call it Comcast... and the bad reputation Comcast has followed it through the "rebrand".

 

Also, it's very expensive to do a rebrand. That money would be better spent on real CapEx to upgrade the worst performing cell sites, to expand coverage to reduce roaming costs in highly trafficked areas, or to pay down debt.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This leaves Dish unlikely to be sought after by Verizon now, opening up more chance for a merger with T-Mobile. However, I would love for Softbank to go after both Dish and T-Mobile at this point, something which unless Trump and the new FCC administration have taken a major liking to Masa, very unlikely will happen, let alone the Sprint/T-Mobile merger possibility. Although, I'd be really supportive of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their BRS/EBS licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well.  — — — — — Edit: Turns out this is a spectrum swap where T-Mobile is basically giving them DoD spectrum in a bunch of markets in exchange for all of SoniqWave's BRS/EBS. SoniqWave will likely turn around and sell the DoD spectrum to AT&T whenever the FCC removes the 40MHz cap.
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...