Jump to content

Current Sprint PRLs


halcyoncmdr

Recommended Posts

What type of market is this in?  Alcatel-Lucent?  Ericsson?  Was this before the MC2 update? 

 

The reason I ask is there are several people here along with several on XDA that had no issues with 800SMR on their Note2.  I for one would have basically had a unusable phone during trip to Vegas last month if it were not for 800SMR saving the day.  EVDO was dead, no LTE available, and 1X PCS was also flooded.  My wife's S3 was a paperweight.  I noticed EVDO was dead so I forced to 1X only on the 800SMR that was in testing on 22429 and my Note2 sprang back to life, texting worked, voice worked and best of all data worked.  Definitely kills the time to read/post on S4GRU while waiting in line instead of looking at the back of someones head! 

 

I believe Vegas is a Samsung market, I've also used it in Dallas which is a Ericsson market.  But this was also before I upgraded to MC2. There's some sort of denominator to figure out here and hope they do figure it out soon as I'm sure it has negatively impacted customers that have seen a loss of coverage since they had the 800SMR for quite a while, it also impacts their roaming revenue as it totally undoes the huge initiative behind network vision.  Sprint/Ericsson hasn't launched any 800SMR in the Baton Rouge area yet so I can't say if it will work on the MC2 update but I will keep my eye out for it and do a full line of testing. 

 

 

 

No fight at all.  I just dial ##DATA# and mash PRL Write... ;)

I do know some of the issues were on the East coast in Lucent territory. I have no proof if they all were or were not.

Just hope they figure out what the issue really is and find a fix other than restricting the Notes via PRL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

June 4th April 12th Type Version Description

 

21097    21096      LTE  IL-LTE

 

21096 was and now 21097 (both labeled Type = IL-LTE) is used for the WiMax GS2.  Why Sprint would list them as LTE when they're also using them to add BC10 to a WiMax phone?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

June 4th April 12th Type Version Description

 

21097    21096      LTE  IL-LTE

 

21096 was and now 21097 (both labeled Type = IL-LTE) is used for the WiMax GS2.  Why Sprint would list them as LTE when they're also using them to add BC10 to a WiMax phone?  

 

I removed some columns that were present in the original file as they were not particularly relevant. Every device is listed in Sprint's systems with each frequency it supports, and is classified by the combination of frequencies it can simultaneously transmit/receive on. This is why svLTE is listed separately from the LTE ones in the list. I'm assuming the GS2 happens to meet the exact same qualifications as the IL-LTE devices in regards to frequency support (WiMax does not rely on PRLs to function I think, could be wrong on that though). This is only a slightly-educated guess however. I do not have a GS2 handy to check against since they are going End Of Life.

 

The description category is only to get a general category they fall in, it is not a comprehensive listing of every different supported configuration.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you know, digi, I too have the Note 2. I've gone back to your modified PRL after 2000 rolled out.

 

 

What type of market is this in?  Alcatel-Lucent?  Ericsson?  Was this before the MC2 update?

 

I'm in Michigan, a Samsung market. There was a time that several 3G clusters were brought up, many sites broadcasting 800 MHz, and the general consumer PRL release contained the 800 lines. During this time, we saw zero complaints of Note 2 owners coming in about voice and texting problems. I did not hear of this issue at all from any other technicians, neither from personal emails, nor on our dedicated email list.

 

I personally have been using 800 MHz ever since it was accepted on the site closest to my house, and it has been much more reliable than 1900 by far. I can actually send and receive texts in my basement, and call anywhere else in my house (where before that stuff was shaky even outside).

 

From what I know, it sounds to me a bit like it may be specific to certain vendors. After all, in places like Chicago, Note II owners have been able to use 800 MHz for some time now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you know, digi, I too have the Note 2. I've gone back to your modified PRL after 2000 rolled out.

 

 

 

I'm in Michigan, a Samsung market. There was a time that several 3G clusters were brought up, many sites broadcasting 800 MHz, and the general consumer PRL release contained the 800 lines. During this time, we saw zero complaints of Note 2 owners coming in about voice and texting problems. I did not hear of this issue at all from any other technicians, neither from personal emails, nor on our dedicated email list.

 

I personally have been using 800 MHz ever since it was accepted on the site closest to my house, and it has been much more reliable than 1900 by far. I can actually send and receive texts in my basement, and call anywhere else in my house (where before that stuff was shaky even outside).

 

From what I know, it sounds to me a bit like it may be specific to certain vendors. After all, in places like Chicago, Note II owners have been able to use 800 MHz for some time now...

 

Exactly what was I looking for..  so it isn't MC2 which I kind of figured as they could have easily pushed a baseband update to reverse any changes with MC2.  Sounds like this is an issue with Alcatel-Lucent areas and the Note2 on 800SMR, which would fit as I believe the only areas that previously had 800SMR active in the PRLs were Samsung and Ericsson markets and some were activated quite sometime ago and some were active even when the Note2 launched last year. 

 

Sounds like most of us are good, so bring on the 800SMR! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting tidbit from a west Michigan note 2 user...

 

I picked up 800/smr on my way to the campground. Every time I'm on smr and I make a call or send a text, I end up back on PCS/1900mhz. Then I stick on PCS for a few hours. Is there any way to watch what frequency you are in during a call?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting tidbit from a west Michigan note 2 user...

 

I picked up 800/smr on my way to the campground. Every time I'm on smr and I make a call or send a text, I end up back on PCS/1900mhz. Then I stick on PCS for a few hours. Is there any way to watch what frequency you are in during a call?

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

LTE Engineering of the 1X connection.  I use it to watch handoffs from site to site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

From what I know, it sounds to me a bit like it may be specific to certain vendors. After all, in places like Chicago, Note II owners have been able to use 800 MHz for some time now...

A lot of people on this thread are talking as if they've had 800 smr for awhile... but from my understanding I thought that 800 sites couldn't and didn't go live until after iDen was shut down, i.e. July 1?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of people on this thread are talking as if they've had 800 smr for awhile... but from my understanding I thought that 800 sites couldn't and didn't go live until after iDen was shut down, i.e. July 1?

 

I believe we started hearing people getting 800SMR in some areas 12 months ago or maybe even more.  They were able to make room on the 800SMR band in those areas for the CDMA 1x carrier.  It was 800SMR LTE that had to wait for iDen to shut down.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe we started hearing people getting 800SMR in some areas 12 months ago or maybe even more.  They were able to make room on the 800SMR band in those areas for the CDMA 1x carrier.  It was 800SMR LTE that had to wait for iDen to shut down.

Thanks, that had been confusing me for awhile.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any info on the 7xxx PRL a few people reported seeing on the Note2's this weekend?  Looks like they rolled back to 2xxx as of today though.

 

I never saw anything about a 7xxx series of PRLs for the Note II.

 

The only 7xxx series I know of is for the Sprint As You Go devices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never saw anything about a 7xxx series of PRLs for the Note II.

 

The only 7xxx series I know of is for the Sprint As You Go devices.

 

Thanks they must have been testing something over the weekend and decided to roll it back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is it normal for the PRL to have been 2000 ever since I got my Note 2 in April? Sprint Zone always says I need to update my PRL, even when I just did so. ##72768# doesnt change it from 2000 either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is it normal for the PRL to have been 2000 ever since I got my Note 2 in April? Sprint Zone always says I need to update my PRL, even when I just did so. ##72768# doesnt change it from 2000 either.

 

The Note II has its own temporary PRL (and it is shown as such in the Current PRLs spreadsheet with its own section) now because it has issues with 800MHz signals in some areas that no other device does, the 2000 series PRLs remove 800SMR support as Samsung and Sprint try and figure out why.

 

Sprint Zone always says to update the PRL, regardless which device or PRL you have. At least from my experience as a retail tech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any way to block a tower within the PRL? I'm literally directly in the middle of 2 towers at home, both having nearly the same signal strength.. I can sit in a stationary position and watch my phone bounce back and forth between towers.. They don't always hand off nicely and we drop calls.. No big deal now because I put an Airave in.. But when 800smr gets here I'de like to dump the Airave but don't want the 2 fighting for my service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any way to block a tower within the PRL? I'm literally directly in the middle of 2 towers at home, both having nearly the same signal strength.. I can sit in a stationary position and watch my phone bounce back and forth between towers.. They don't always hand off nicely and we drop calls.. No big deal now because I put an Airave in.. But when 800smr gets here I'de like to dump the Airave but don't want the 2 fighting for my service.

 

In a simple answer, no.  That's the very reason why you don't need a PRL update when new sites are built and brought online.  It's a list of wireless systems, not a list of towers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

6/28/2013 Update: 

 

As of this update in the stock PRLs (except for the 2xxx temp Note2 PRL) all of the 800SMR SIDs are included in the scans except for the following areas:........

Sorry to wake up on old post, but could you answer this question. Does this mean that there is no longer any advantage to using  the "testing" PRLs that were created to give access to 800SMR?  Will I have access to 800SMR on my GS3 using the latest stock PRL, 25015.  Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to wake up on old post, but could you answer this question. Does this mean that there is no longer any advantage to using  the "testing" PRLs that were created to give access to 800SMR?  Will I have access to 800SMR on my GS3 using the latest stock PRL, 25015.  Thanks.

 

Correct, except for the any sites that broadcasting the SIDs that are not in the PRL.  Such as the Utah 800SMR that is used around the US in some markets for testing sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct, except for the any sites that broadcasting the SIDs that are not in the PRL.  Such as the Utah 800SMR that is used around the US in some markets for testing sites.

So if I am in a market in the early stages of build-out like Colorado, could I possibly get more 800SMR by using the testing PRL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...