Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

Interesting, I wonder if you caught the crews running the new equipment through the paces during an installation....

I ahve been checking the towers as there are two right near me along 294 and golf road. i havent seen any crews yet. not to say that i couldnt miss them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might just mean that the network software is being updated to eHRPD in preparation for LTE to start coming online.

 

Sent from my CM9 Toro

well that would be good news. I did notice all of the June LTE towers in the updated map.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stupid question.......but will you only see eHRPD as the network on Netmonitor if you have an LTE capable device? Or will it show on my 3G/WiMax phone.....?

 

Sent from my Epic 4G (WiSuck) using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stupid question.......but will you only see eHRPD as the network on Netmonitor if you have an LTE capable device? Or will it show on my 3G/WiMax phone.....?

 

Sent from my Epic 4G (WiSuck) using Forum Runner

 

eHRPD ssessions can only be connected in a LTE device. A WiMax device will only connect to an EVDO session.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

eHRPD ssessions can only be connected in a LTE device. A WiMax device will only connect to an EVDO session.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

Is this because eHRPD handles the seamless 3G to LTE and LTE to 3G transitions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

eHRPD ssessions can only be connected in a LTE device. A WiMax device will only connect to an EVDO session.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

Thanks Robert.

 

Sent from my Epic 4G (WiSuck) using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this because eHRPD handles the seamless 3G to LTE and LTE to 3G transitions?

 

No. It's possible to create a 3G only device that could run on eHRPD. However, eHRPD was created to allow LTE devices to seamlessly transfer back and forth to EVDO. So, only a LTE device needs eHRPD.

 

eHRPD is EVDO-A, and doesn't have better speeds (all things being equal). In a completed NV site, eHRPD and EVDO-A share the same backhaul. However, EVDO data goes to the Sprint MSC Switch and eHRPD goes to the 4G DDC (Core). So on a complete NV site, EVDO and eHRPD should have nearly identical speeds. However, if there is a bottleneck at the Switch, it is possible that EVDO could be slower than eHRPD. Also, the reverse is true, but less likely.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. It's possible to create a 3G only device that could run on eHRPD. However, eHRPD was created to allow LTE devices to seamlessly transfer back and forth to EVDO. So, only a LTE device needs eHRPD.

 

eHRPD is EVDO-A, and doesn't have better speeds (all things being equal). In a completed NV site, eHRPD and EVDO-A share the same backhaul. However, EVDO data goes to the Sprint MSC Switch and eHRPD goes to the 4G DDC (Core). So on a complete NV site, EVDO and eHRPD should have nearly identical speeds. However, if there is a bottleneck at the Switch, it is possible that EVDO could be slower than eHRPD. Also, the reverse is true, but less likely.

 

Robert

 

:o you're so smart........ lol ;)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Pleasant surprise at work this morning.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

 

Do you work in a lead lined building? That's a weak signal for being relatively close.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you work in a lead lined building? That's a weak signal for being relatively close.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

See comments in this prior thread in the Samsung forum here about testing aerxx's signal performance with a GS3 in his workplace. What we don't have are any controlled comparison tests of other devices at this location.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Do you work in a lead lined building? That's a weak signal for being relatively close.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

Home Depot.....

 

My OG EPIC was about the same.....maybe one bar better.

 

This is standing outside at the same location....

http://www.imgur.com/pr8Hm.jpg

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Home Depot.....

 

My OG EPIC was about the same.....maybe one bar better.

 

Okay, now you have confused me. We started this conversation with you reporting,:

 

I get half the bars indoors that my OG EPIC would get..

 

Then you did some more testing of your GS3, and said:

 

1bar -101dbm

2bar -97dbm

 

This is what I have been averaging all day inside work.

 

You did not correct my extrapolation of that:

 

And your old Epic 4G was typically 3 bars or better in the same location? (That would correspond to -91 dBm or better on my reference scale.)

 

And now you say the Epic 4G's performance "was about the same" after all? Sorry, but this seems like a wild goose chase. It goes to show that anecdotal reports of performance, especially those that rely on somebody's subjective memory, are not very reliable. There has to be some controlled testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One day of testing is what was reported and I wasnt connected to eHRPD. I dont know if thats the difference or not. Im going to assume it is.

 

I kook forward to reading anyone elses results.....

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One day of testing is what was reported and I wasnt connected to eHRPD. I dont know if thats the difference or not. Im going to assume it is.

There doesn't seem to be any significant difference with this eHPRD report and your earlier tests of the GS3 performance. My point is that your recollections of your old Epic 4G's performance at the same site have been all over the lot, which led to confusing comparisons.

.

EDIT: I don't mean this personally. None of us can really trust our subjective memories on stuff like this. That's why scientists do double-blind studies, etc. I know I have no reliable memory of what my phone's historical performance has been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the term "half" shouldnt have been used. I now get 1 bar where I used to get 2. I get 2 where it used to fluxuate 3 and 4. In my eyes, that would make this phones antenna perform half as well as my EPIC. Even as I was typing this....my signal went anywhere from no service to 3 bars.

 

What made me say that its "about the same" today, is because I still have the same slow speeds and inconsistant signal that I have always had inside my work.

 

Like I said...I cant wait to see what everyone else sees.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There doesn't seem to be any significant difference with this eHPRD report and your earlier tests of the GS3 peformance.

.

 

This was a bad assumtion on my part. I thought I read somewhere that eHRPD sessions had a higher signal strength.....

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was a bad assumtion on my part. I thought I read somewhere that eHRPD sessions had a higher signal strength.....

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

 

I don't know if I would say eHRPD has higher signal strength. But what can happen: if you are comparing an EVDO legacy signal to an eHRPD signal from a Network Vision site, there may be some improvement. However, I personally would never say that eHRPD has a stronger signal than EVDO, because that would not be true technically.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

workers at Tower CH13XC009 In Glenview @ Glenview Road and Greenwood. New radios r up and they are huge. Also they installed a fiber backhual through the gas station and down the street a good 100 yards or so to whatever it is they connect the fiber to.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...