Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy S III


Jayman

Recommended Posts

How about standard dBm units instead of "bars," which can vary among products?

 

On my Epic 4G, the "bars" display corresponds to the following levels:

  • 0 bars = -106 dBm
  • 1 bar = -101 dBm
  • 2 bars = -96 dBm
  • 3 bars = -91 dBm
  • 4 bars = -86 dBm
  • 5 bars = -76 dBm
  • 6 bars = -65 dBm

What are the equivalent levels on your Galaxy S III?

 

 

I have 6 bars right now -70 dBm 16 asu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cancelled my online BB preorder. Best buy still treats online preorders with lowest priority. Ill take my chances finding one in store next week or just wait for the next big thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What is the signal dbm? Bars are irrelevant.

 

1bar -101dbm

2bar -97dbm

 

This is what I have been averaging all day inside work.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1bar -101dbm

2bar -97dbm

 

This is what I have been averaging all day inside work.

 

And your old Epic 4G was typically 3 bars or better in the same location? (That would correspond to -91 dBm or better on my reference scale.)

 

If that is so, it's hard to swallow the new GS3's antenna underperforming the antenna on its own grandfather phone by about 10 dB. (The antenna output is what you theoretically are measuring so far, assuming no change in the Sprint network's RF performance.)

 

I really do hope that when Robert gets his unit, he will follow through with his suggestion to do some controlled comparison tests. I also hope for something that puts the phones through end-to-end performance testing of some kind, not just antenna output readings, that exercises the Tx/Rx functionality of the radio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of Best Buy, is the S3 in stores?

 

Not for selling but at least to look at it and feel it. Or does one have to wait till next week.

 

I want to see both the HTC EVo LTE and the S3 and get a feel of them side by side.

 

TS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

And your old Epic 4G was typically 3 bars or better in the same location? (That would correspond to -91 dBm or better on my reference scale.)

 

If that is so' date=' it's hard to swallow the new GS3's antenna underperforming the antenna on its own grandfather phone by about 10 dB. (The antenna output is what you theoretically are measuring so far, assuming no change in the Sprint network's RF performance.)

 

I really do hope that when Robert gets his unit, he will follow through with his suggestion to do some controlled comparison tests. I also hope for something that puts the phones through end-to-end performance testing of some kind, not just antenna output readings, that exercises the Tx/Rx functionality of the radio.[/quote']

 

I dont know about under performing......I work for the Home Depot....and those buildings are cellular signal black holes. The antenna performs amazingly everywhere else.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know about under performing......I work for the Home Depot....and those buildings are cellular signal black holes. The antenna performs amazingly everywhere else.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

 

Oh, so Sprint gives you that nice 25% discount, too.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be sure to do signal tests (including phone calls to *2) when I get my SIII, comparing it to my Epic. Between my apartment (a few hundred yards away from a rooftop cell site) and the Coors tasting room (a near-dead zone for at least Sprint and T-Mobile), I should be able to get a few nice data points :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know about under performing......I work for the Home Depot....and those buildings are cellular signal black holes. The antenna performs amazingly everywhere else.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

 

I wonder why the signal is lower at your house... are the dBm readings you put down the RSSI? Are both phones connecting to the same tower?

 

I'm thinking that it is possible that the GS3 radios are able to "see" another tower with a better signal to noise ratio. It might connect to that tower, even if the signal strength is lower, as it might be a more useful connection because the ec/io is lower. Just spitballing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I wonder why the signal is lower at your house... are the dBm readings you put down the RSSI? Are both phones connecting to the same tower?

 

I'm thinking that it is possible that the GS3 radios are able to "see" another tower with a better signal to noise ratio. It might connect to that tower' date=' even if the signal strength is lower, as it might be a more useful connection because the ec/io is lower. Just spitballing.[/quote']

 

Netmonitor or open signal would be an easy way to see what tower you are connecting to on each device

 

Sent from my CM9 Epic 4g Touch using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to consider when digesting these dBm readings is that the antenna output being measured is the Rx level from the legacy 3G/CDMA network. The device has a separate antenna configuration for LTE use, with two Rx antennas, that no one is able to test today. I think I recall reports here on S4GRU that the EVO LTE model, which has its own separate, LTE-specific antenna layout, also showed some unexplained weakness in initial Rx measurements using the legacy network.

 

So maybe this generation of LTE-enabled Sprint handsets is optimized for the next-generation NV Sprint network, rather than for the network we are all using today.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to consider when digesting these dBm readings is that the antenna output being measured is the Rx level from the legacy 3G/CDMA network. The device has a separate antenna configuration for LTE use' date=' with two Rx antennas, that no one is able to test today. I think I recall reports here on S4GRU that the EVO LTE model, which has its own separate, LTE-specific antenna layout, also showed some unexplained weakness in initial Rx measurements using the legacy network.

 

So maybe this generation of LTE-enabled Sprint handsets is optimized for the next-generation NV Sprint network, rather than for the network we are all using today.[/quote']

 

This is a great point. I was using CDMA only. I will switch and try it a different way on Monday. I just assumed that the CDMA/LTE radio would drain the battery quicker because it would always be searching for an LTE signal....

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a great point. I was using CDMA only. I will switch and try it a different way on Monday. I just assumed that the CDMA/LTE radio would drain the battery quicker because it would always be searching for an LTE signal....

 

This is probably beyond your control right now. I don't think you will be able to test the LTE downlink strength until after Sprint turns it on in your area. With few exceptions, even the LTE sites that are finished are still being blocked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is probably beyond your control right now. I don't think you will be able to test the LTE downlink strength until after Sprint turns it on in your area. With few exceptions' date=' even the LTE sites that are finished are still being blocked.[/quote']

 

I know this. I'm going to try updating my PRL and profile at home instead of work.....for some reason that seemed to help with my OG EPIC.

 

And I always have full signal at home........thank you AirRave......

 

Sent from my Xoom using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to consider when digesting these dBm readings is that the antenna output being measured is the Rx level from the legacy 3G/CDMA network. The device has a separate antenna configuration for LTE use' date=' with two Rx antennas, that no one is able to test today. I think I recall reports here on S4GRU that the EVO LTE model, which has its own separate, LTE-specific antenna layout, also showed some unexplained weakness in initial Rx measurements using the legacy network.

 

So maybe this generation of LTE-enabled Sprint handsets is optimized for the next-generation NV Sprint network, rather than for the network we are all using today.[/quote']

 

Great observation

 

Sent from my CM9 Toro using Forum Runner

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How I wish Sprint would send my handset !

I have all accessories and no phone.

 

I frown at Samsung for this!

They knew this would happen!

 

Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk 2

 

I wish I had the forward thinking to buy accessories for this phone beforehand like you. After going to 3 different sprint stores today, I am now the proud owner of a Pebble Blue Body Glove case and a White GSIII....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to consider when digesting these dBm readings is that the antenna output being measured is the Rx level from the legacy 3G/CDMA network. The device has a separate antenna configuration for LTE use, with two Rx antennas, that no one is able to test today. I think I recall reports here on S4GRU that the EVO LTE model, which has its own separate, LTE-specific antenna layout, also showed some unexplained weakness in initial Rx measurements using the legacy network.

 

So maybe this generation of LTE-enabled Sprint handsets is optimized for the next-generation NV Sprint network, rather than for the network we are all using today.

Great observation

 

Sent from my CM9 Toro using Forum Runner

 

Sorry for the slightly off topic and probably previously answered question but, what is(are) the advantage(s) of of the dual Rx antennas we're seeing in the new Sprint phones?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for the slightly off topic and probably previously answered question but, what is(are) the advantage(s) of of the dual Rx antennas we're seeing in the new Sprint phones?

 

I frankly don't know. The serious RF engineering stuff is over my head. But it is not over the head of some veterans on this forum.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for the slightly off topic and probably previously answered question but, what is(are) the advantage(s) of of the dual Rx antennas we're seeing in the new Sprint phones?

2x2 downlink MIMO
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Faster downloads as it is 2 download links working in tandem

 

Well, not quite that simple... It uses the 2 antennas as an array, improving the spectral efficiency and/or reliability of the connection.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Faster downloads as it is 2 download links working in tandem

 

Well, not quite that simple... It uses the 2 antennas as an array, improving the spectral efficiency and/or reliability of the connection.

 

I like the sound of that! Thanks, Man!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...