Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Missouri Market (includes St. Louis)


riddlebox

Recommended Posts

I've been following this thread for a while, but this is my first time posting. Thanks everyone for the info that has been shared, here.

 

This afternoon, I was on my way back to STL from the Branson area, this weekend, and randomly picked up LTE between Lebanon and Waynesville. I'd say I was due south of Stoutland right around mile marker 140 on 44.

 

I think I remember reading something about a tower possibly being up in this area, but there aren't any points on Sensorly, so I thought I'd report this to everyone, here. I did a speed test and got 19.92 down, 8.41 up and a ping of 79.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been following this thread for a while, but this is my first time posting. Thanks everyone for the info that has been shared, here.

 

This afternoon, I was on my way back to STL from the Branson area, this weekend, and randomly picked up LTE between Lebanon and Waynesville. I'd say I was due south of Stoutland right around mile marker 140 on 44.

 

I think I remember reading something about a tower possibly being up in this area, but there aren't any points on Sensorly, so I thought I'd report this to everyone, here. I did a speed test and got 19.92 down, 8.41 up and a ping of 79.

 

Our Sites Complete map does show two towers in that area as having LTE complete, so thanks for confirming that!

Too bad you have an iPhone .... :P no Sensorly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still having major voice issues and it has gotten worse! Have attempted calling as much as 10 times before it connects. This is in good service area with at least 3 "bars". Everyone I know with Sprint in Madison County is having the same problems. I just don't understand how we are having problems on this side of the river and no problems on the MO side..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have experienced minor issues with that recently. In the last week 2 or 3 calls took a second try to connect, but it hadn't gotten bad, yet.

 

Also I did a little bit of plotting on the tower by Tandy park, but I was there at the wrong time of day so I just went as far east and west as it would reach.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

New to the site, but have been lurking for awhile. While sitting in a Southwest Airlines jet at the east terminal at Lambert, I noticed a 4G signal. I did not get a chance to run a speedtest (pulling back from the gate), but the signal strength was -77 dBm 8asu (according to my Note 2). Mobile network type of LTE:14. Also, had a good signal (i believe 4 bars). Hopefully, that's a good sign for things to come!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

New to the site, but have been lurking for awhile. While sitting in a Southwest Airlines jet at the east terminal at Lambert, I noticed a 4G signal. I did not get a chance to run a speedtest (pulling back from the gate), but the signal strength was -77 dBm 8asu (according to my Note 2). Mobile network type of LTE:14. Also, had a good signal (i believe 4 bars). Hopefully, that's a good sign for things to come!

 

Yep, a couple of towers near the airport have been completed, and more will be online soon! Plotting on Sensorly is more important than speed tests. So next time you connect, pull out the Sensorly app rather than the Speedtest!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, a couple of towers near the airport have been completed, and more will be online soon! Plotting on Sensorly is more important than speed tests. So next time you connect, pull out the Sensorly app rather than the Speedtest!

 

Seeing the entire airport turn purple would be cool!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, a couple of towers near the airport have been completed, and more will be online soon! Plotting on Sensorly is more important than speed tests. So next time you connect, pull out the Sensorly app rather than the Speedtest!

 

I sure will. I'l try when I return to StL on Tuesday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have some good news. My brother got LTE on his SGS3 at Lewis and Clark Blvd and Chambers road. He said that he ran a speedtest, but he lost LTE before it finished. It was either a weak signal or they had just finished testing. On sensorly, I also saw some points for LTE on Hwy H and some in Clayton. I will see if I can get LTE where my brother got it tomorrow since I will be close. I'll post back and let you know if I picked up LTE in that same location.

 

I will run by this area tonight and check the tower near that intersection. I will compare the SCID's to the SCID's I have recorded for the Dellwood Site. I will update you all around 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I will run by this area tonight and check the tower near that intersection. I will compare the SCID's to the SCID's I have recorded for the Dellwood Site. I will update you all around 6.

 

Awesome! I apologize for saying I would be able to check it out, but I ran into some unexpected issues and was not able to go on Sunday. I would be able to go next Sunday, but it looks like you're going to beat me to it! Haha. Anyways, my apologies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

US Cellular customers in STL are getting letters this week.

 

I kind of wish they would have to wait until NV is done to be integrated, but it doesn't look like that's the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Letters are going out for US Cellular customers... They include this FAQ...

 

http://www.uscellula...nt-Websites.pdf

 

There's also this story on the TeamUSCellular blog:

 

http://teamuscellula...ted-422-110-pm/

 

It is going to be interesting to see if Sprint's footprint post-Network Vision in St. Louis will equal USCC's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is going to be interesting to see if Sprint's footprint post-Network Vision in St. Louis will equal USCC's.

 

Really? I don't know much about USC, and I know sensorly is not the be all end all, but sprints stl footprint seems way bigger/better than usc.

 

My understanding is that this isn't about footprint, but about spectrum bandwidth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Letters are going out for US Cellular customers... They include this FAQ...

 

http://www.uscellula...nt-Websites.pdf

 

There's also this story on the TeamUSCellular blog:

 

http://teamuscellula...ted-422-110-pm/

 

It is going to be interesting to see if Sprint's footprint post-Network Vision in St. Louis will equal USCC's.

 

I wonder if this announcement accelerates the STL NV rollout? 'Twould be nice...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still having major voice issues and it has gotten worse! Have attempted calling as much as 10 times before it connects. This is in good service area with at least 3 "bars". Everyone I know with Sprint in Madison County is having the same problems. I just don't understand how we are having problems on this side of the river and no problems on the MO side..

 

My problems have vanished for now....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone checked out the site at 170 and Airport Rd? Sensorly shows a really strong reading there for being so far from 270 and Lindbergh.

 

Edit: This would be the one inside the TitleMax sign at 170 and Airport

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Those 2 are soooo close together :o

 

One is an external Macro site, and the other is a DAS site. Both are on Anheuser Busch property.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey been checking this out for awhile was wondering how to become a sponsor? I was working at park east tower in the CWE and noticed 4g when I was on the 25th floor but nothing street level didn't have a chance to fire up sensorly but suspect it's the north city tower

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One is an external Macro site, and the other is a DAS site. Both are on Anheuser Busch property.

 

Each of the Clydesdales gets two handsets, a tablet, a hotspot, and an aircard. It is in their contracts. They are data using stallions.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...