Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy S8 & Dual Sim/Duos


Andrew Revering

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, SeanK_ said:

What you mean?

I'm just trying to see if anybody has had any issues with this update before I install it.  I know that has happened in the past, even with small, security update.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, clbowens said:

I'm just trying to see if anybody has had any issues with this update before I install it.  I know that has happened in the past, even with small, security update.

I was thinking you were having issues, but I haven't so far.

 

Doesn't this fix the KRACK WPA2 weakness? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, SeanK_ said:

I was thinking you were having issues, but I haven't so far.

 

Doesn't this fix the KRACK WPA2 weakness? 

 

It should fix the KRACK issue as that was patched in the Nov security update by Google. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If past is any indication, then it will either be next Monday or Tuesday.  Looking forward to improved battery life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a pleasant surprise it came to us so much earlier this time.  My DL size is different from the Korean and UK models at 508.03 MB (QL8)(955U1).  What was the DL size for the Sprint version?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a pleasant surprise it came to us so much earlier this time.  My DL size is different from the Korean and UK models at 508.03 MB (QL8)(955U1).  What was the DL size for the Sprint version?  
666mb. I'll get the holy water.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, optimummind said:

What a pleasant surprise it came to us so much earlier this time.  My DL size is different from the Korean and UK models at 508.03 MB (QL8)(955U1).  What was the DL size for the Sprint version?  

I am on beta 3.  My download is at 508.03 MB

Rzj8KnJ.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing is for sure. The band 41 and band 25 radio has been improved quite a bit and beta 3 was already good. Beta 4 has me on b41 that I normally would never be on. I hope this is the baseband that is going to be on the final release.

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/15/2017 at 10:44 PM, Terrell352 said:

One thing is for sure. The band 41 and band 25 radio has been improved quite a bit and beta 3 was already good. Beta 4 has me on b41 that I normally would never be on. I hope this is the baseband that is going to be on the final release.

That's good to hear, baseband improvements are always welcome.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

What screen protectors do you guys use/recommend for the S8 (not plus)? Was looking at many on Amazon, and many reviews stating screen protectors don't cover entire screen, or won't stick to edges causing lifting in cases. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Marv1 said:

What screen protectors do you guys use/recommend for the S8 (not plus)? Was looking at many on Amazon, and many reviews stating screen protectors don't cover entire screen, or won't stick to edges causing lifting in cases. 

I use nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...