Jump to content

Sprint wants to save $1B by relocating towers


JeffDTD

Recommended Posts

Link?

 also did hear this.... that there's been certain municipalities and districts that they are having trouble negotiating with, but I was also told a significant number of approvals have been granted though in some major cities. Light poles seam to be getting the higher approval rate, building's and other structures seam to be harder to deal with because it requires dealing with the people who own those properties.

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far it is working. The tower company's stocks are plummeting from the news.

Anyone care to comment.... if you have 0 lte plus in your city currently..... n im really talking about anywhere ..... what are your chances of getting it by the end of this year???

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A point about backhaul that I'm not sure people are aware of. The fiber used from the cell sites is not routed the same way your home internet would be. In order to get fiber backhaul, the link has to go directly to the switch site, not touching the Internet along the way. Usually that's where the AAVs and LECs come into play, since they have last-mile fiber and can provide point to point connections. 

You can use MPLS or CE to provision cell site backhaul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone care to comment.... if you have 0 lte plus in your city currently..... n im really talking about anywhere ..... what are your chances of getting it by the end of this year???

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

In a city your size, pretty darn good. Probably sooner.

 

Sent from my LG G4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a city your size, pretty darn good. Probably sooner.

 

Sent from my LG G4

In theory... we are both thinking the same way...now with me only having 3 wimax sites....sprint would have to build b41 on to the network vision sites.. how long does it take sprint to do so.... let's say to at least cover 70% with b41

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In theory... we are both thinking the same way...now with me only having 3 wimax sites....sprint would have to build b41 on to the network vision sites.. how long does it take sprint to do so.... let's say to at least cover 70% with b41

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

I'm pretty sure that once work begins on a tower to install the 8T8R panels that it's like max 3-4 days per tower, IIRC. Someone else feel free to chime in if I'm wrong :) .

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure that once work begins on a tower to install the 8T8R panels that it's like max 3-4 days per tower, IIRC. Someone else feel free to chime in if I'm wrong :) .

 

-Anthony

What do you think is the biggest hold back? Is it site approvals, low funds, or a little of both?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think sprint is that far off from completing the nationwide roll out

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Some say Sprint could be around 40-50% complete. It's only been about a year since they strated rolling out 8t8r on sites, so they're not making too bad of progress.

 

-Anthony

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a screenshot from a buddy he was shocked that speeds were that fast

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

tell your buddy to be careful, unless he is on an unlimited plan those speed tests burn tons of data...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Capture+_2016-01-21-05-11-091.jpg would these speeds be considered enhanced LTE or still 700 mhz10 by 10 for at&t

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Wanna say that's definitely CA. I don't think 10x10 could get that high in reality as that speed is right about where the max theoretical for 10 MHz FDD lies. I don't think AT&T really has a marketing name for its CA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's amazing how these stories of network plans can have such detailed analyses of how bad the situation will be with vague rumors. Interesting. Everyone assumes that Sprint will decommission macro sites before small cells are live to replace them and verified. That is a mighty big assumption.

 

Hear rumors from people with ulterior motives (tower companies) and then come up with detailed doomsday scenarios. And yet, if Tmo did the same thing, it would be called innovative and they'd be given every benefit of the doubt. But if Sprint does anything new, they'll fail.

 

No matter if that small cell planning is just large scale supplemental for macro sites or a macro site replacement scenario, this will be Marcelo and Masa's deal. It could save Sprint. Or it could kill it. Time will tell. And it's their company to run.

 

Personally, I wouldn't replace the macro network. But I sure would supplement and possibly expand it using small cells in Public ROW. I sure won't rush to judgment until I hear more from Marcelo and Saw. I'm definitely intrigued.

 

Sent from OnePlus 2 using Tapatalk

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Sprint needs to start suing these people. Dr saw debunked the RE/Code article in the Willy Episode , and now these jokers keep coming with the same type of articles. I am starting to feel these people are being paid by the other 3 carriers to put out misinformation out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...