Jump to content

Nokia moves to purchase Alcatel-Lucent


EvanA

Recommended Posts

Will be troubling times for existing Alcatel-Lucent markets in the short term but an exciting time for the future as the weakest NV vendor regions get cannibalized by Samsung, Ericson, and Nokia.

 

Lots of question marks will be have have over the existing deployments from both Nokia and alu territory.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will be troubling times for existing Alcatel-Lucent markets in the short term but an exciting time for the future as the weakest NV vendor regions get cannibalized by Samsung, Ericson, and Nokia.

 

Lots of question marks will be have have over the existing deployments from both Nokia and alu territory.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

:td:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not so sure how I feel about this right now.  I mean Nokia seems to be doing pretty well with its network equipment but I just don't know how much impact this has on LTE deployment especially in markets that use their equipment for B25/B26/B41 LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why this is a bad thing. Did another source indicate they were immediately shutting down equipment manufacturing for the Alcatel side of the house? My assumption (while probably incorrect) is that nothing will change in the near term other than AP/AR header information saying Nokia now instead of Alcatel - and the back office updates to make that happen. Did I miss something that indicated Alcatel was going to be effectively shut down?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not so sure how I feel about this right now.  I mean Nokia seems to be doing pretty well with its network equipment but I just don't know how much impact this has on LTE deployment especially in markets that use their equipment for B25/B26/B41 LTE.

 

I don't imagine it would have any impact in the short term. Legacy equipment will remain for as long as they are in their useful lives. I imagine that interoperability between ALU and Nokia equipment will be improved over time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand why this is a bad thing. Did another source indicate they were immediately shutting down equipment manufacturing for the Alcatel side of the house? My assumption (while probably incorrect) is that nothing will change in the near term other than AP/AR header information saying Nokia now instead of Alcatel - and the back office updates to make that happen. Did I miss something that indicated Alcatel was going to be effectively shut down?

I seriously doubt that. Also they can't just shutdown equipment, they deployed it and it is run by whomever and ALU simply supports it. Sprint could ALU equipment forever as long as they keep paying for support. It will be ALU equipment regardless of who owns them, its just who you call for support that will change.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldnt it be better for output? 2x the people making the same thing, rather than 2 different pieces.

These mergers rarely come without layoffs, especially when major overlap in products/services exists.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://online.barrons.com/articles/sprint-may-have-spurred-nokia-alcatel-lucent-deal-1429282538

 

 

Speculation of a Nokia-Alcatel-Lucent wireless-asset merger first surfaced about one and a half years ago but receded. We think the latest round of talks was spurred on by Sprint ( S)which wanted to see the wireless assets combine so that it could rely on the new entity as its primary or even sole wireless equipment vendor going forward. 

 

Interesting speculation

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I have heard internal rumors that Sprint (via Masa) was considering a move to just two network vendors from here forward.  For a good year or so.  Dumping Ericsson.  But not feeling good about ALU as the only other partner with Samsung.  But going to two vendors with Samsung and Nokia (via an ALU buyout) may not be so bad.  So Sprint being part of the catalyst for this marriage is plausible when put into context with the rumors I've heard.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have heard internal rumors that Sprint (via Masa) was considering a move to just two network vendors from here forward. For a good year or so. Dumping Ericsson. But not feeling good about ALU as the only other partner with Samsung. But going to two vendors with Samsung and Nokia (via an ALU buyout) may not be so bad. So Sprint being part of the catalyst for this marriage is plausible when put into context with the rumors I've heard.

The cdma portfolio from Alcatel-Lucent may be all that Nokia needs. Their cdma offerings are far inferior as it currently exists.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

 

 

The transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2016.

 

Faster Nokia, faster!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

s6gru.com is still open!

 

Let the sex guru jokes commence...

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Luckily, that hasn't arisen in my area where I am, aside from having B14 (well, ALL of AT&T signal) not work at all in Coosa county, Alabama. I wish there was a service for first responders that would go to ANY available carrier, provider, etc..and in the absolute worst case scenario, would give us service. I've been on an ambulance, trying to find an address, and my driver actually had to pull over and we pulled out a map book and tried to find the road using the "old fashioned way".. and that takes valuable time away that sometimes may be vital to someone surviving. BUT, I will say that I've only seen that in Coosa county... both my Tmo and AT&T phones had zero service and I couldn't get GPS, and neither could my driver (VZW service). Maybe satellite will help with that in those times where that occurs.. but that's an extreme example.     Edit to add: Let me add some context to this.. Coosa county isn't regular coverage area for my job.. so it's not a regular thing that we are dispatched to Coosa county.. and actually, there's been a change and that county now has it's own ambulance service that operates.. so the only time we might receive a request is if it's a multiple casualty scenario, or it's a transfer going home from our contracted hospital.  The way that reads above, it may seem like we are just out without some sort of GPS gadget to direct us on where to go, but for the most part, we know our coverage area pretty well. Dispatch can also give us cross streets for reference inside our coverage area (and our home county). Coosa just isn't a regular area for my job to run in. 
    • "Priority" doesn't mean "exclusivity."  When emergency services don't need B14, AT&T can use it for everyone else.  The trade-off is that when it is needed for emergency services, they not only get all of B14, but they have also arranged for priority on the rest of the AT&T network as well.  Beats having spectrum sitting unused most of the time and then not having enough when disaster strikes, as it could be without a partnership with a wireless company like AT&T. - Trip
    • I've wondered if being on the first responder plan has the priority over other 'regular' lines in the same way firstnet does (or, supposed to do with B14...I've seen normal customers on AT&T hit B14 so it's not {specifically} for Firstnet only)...  
    • T-Mobile prices people pay are all over the map. The free lines are key, so take them if ever offered again.  Your priority level would be a key factor for your price.  Only T-Mobile would know the average prices people pay.  Samsung has been offering very good deals at time of new model introductions so I have gone that route for factory unlocked, which allows me to also have a Verizon priority MVNO for when T-Mobile signal fails or I manually override.
    • I also wanted to post a speed test result.. I only do these once in a while from my home area because we are gonna be the last to see changes, like load balancing.  Right now they are digging all over the place for fiber installs, so I'm not sure what the hold-up is on making the upload speed a little more in-line with download speeds, but here is the most recent from my area:   https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/10133670525
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...