Jump to content

LG G4 User Thread (Was: Rumor Thread)


JThorson

Recommended Posts

He had to wait through all the LG iterations of Gx to finally make this joke! :-D

 

Yep, you found me out.  I joined S4GRU three years ago and bided my time through 13,000 posts -- just so I could finally make my LG G4 palindrome.

 

Now, my only reason to live is the hope that "5G" will become a marketing term by the time the LG G5 is released.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LG G4 4G GL TACO CAT

 

The taco cat is already available at that weird Mexican/Chinese hybrid restaurant in every city.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TACO CAT RUMORS REVEALED

 

http://g4.xfb.kr/feature.html?name=section1

 

Pretty legit. I'll wait for reviews and RF articles from AJ.

 

Edit: site's down now. Sorry suckers! Hopefully someone will have a cached site up soon. Talked about screen tech, camera, removable 3000mAh battery and SD card slot. IPS screen at 2k. 5.5 inch. Etc.

 

sent from an underwater dust storm from my Sprint S5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TACO CAT RUMORS REVEALED

 

http://g4.xfb.kr/feature.html?name=section1

 

Pretty legit. I'll wait for reviews and RF articles from AJ.

 

Edit: site's down now. Sorry suckers! Hopefully someone will have a cached site up soon. Talked about screen tech, camera, removable 3000mAh battery and SD card slot. IPS screen at 2k. 5.5 inch. Etc.

 

sent from an underwater dust storm from my Sprint S5

Not sure if I'm a fan of the back cover.

http://www.androidexplained.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/LG_G4.jpg

 

The front looks fine. G4 is going to really appeal to the customers with SD cards and a need for the removable battery.

 

Edit: here's another site with more info.

http://9to5google.com/2015/04/11/lg-g4-micro-site-leaked/

 

Sent from my M8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if I'm a fan of the back cover.

http://www.androidexplained.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/LG_G4.jpg

 

The front looks fine. G4 is going to really appeal to the customers with SD cards and a need for the removable battery.

 

Edit: here's another site with more info.

http://9to5google.com/2015/04/11/lg-g4-micro-site-leaked/

 

Sent from my M8

I'm super disappointed with the rear facing speaker. I thought we'd moved on to front facing speakers in 2015. And 2.1mp "selfie" camera. Why not the 8mp they announced? Appears to have Qi charging though, hopefully without "optional back". I think I'm going to have to go with Samsung S6......or perhaps none at all until the fall crop.

 

sent from an underwater dust storm from my Sprint S5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had the S6 edge on pre-order but decided to not pick it up. I am trying to upgrade my Nexus 5 and although there are a LOT of things to still like about it, the camera is laughable, the battery life is terrible, and google still doesn't have split screen multitasking. The S6 has an awesome camera and I love their mobile payment solution (coming soon), but their battery life is bad, their rf performance seems lacking (more to come on this), their touchwiz skin with Flipboard integration is slow and ugly, the design is not comfortable to hold and, unless you get the edge, slightly dated looking in my opinion.

 

The G4 on the other hand looks really nice in my opinion (except the leather backs which are fugly). It seems it will be very comfortable to hold. The camera appears to be better at least on paper. There is a large battery which is removable and expandable memory. On the negative, we still don't know about rf performance, how the speaker will sound, the CPU performance, etc. Because I don't want to live with regret, I decided to wait and forgo my free wireless samsung charger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The G4 on the other hand looks really nice in my opinion (except the leather backs which are fugly). It seems it will be very comfortable to hold. The camera appears to be better at least on paper. There is a large battery which is removable and expandable memory. On the negative, we still don't know about rf performance, how the speaker will sound, the CPU performance, etc. Because I don't want to live with regret, I decided to wait and forgo my free wireless samsung charger.

I'm sure Best Buy will continue to offer incentives for the S6 in the coming weeks.  Afterall, Samsung wants to break sales records with the S6.  My brother just got the S6 Edge and he really likes it.  Also, the battery on it appears to be a bit better than his S5 was, at least in standby.

 

I think waiting for the G4 is a wise move.  The wireless charger is only a $60 difference so if they offer a $100 off 2/yr contract on the S6 later and you jump on it, you actually ended up saving more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am hoping LG releases a highly-spec'ed non-phablet device to compete with the M9 and S6. I find that devices larger than say 5.2" are too large for single handed use and therefore I personally (and I suspect many others) won't consider purchasing them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The G3 isn't really all that much bigger in the hand than my GS5, 3mm wider iirc. The small bezel helps quite a bit.

 

I also think those leather backs look sexy. The red one screams terminatrix.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am glad to see they have multiple options for the back cover. Anyone know what is so special about the Quantum IPS display they are talking about?

LG announces new 5.5-inch QHD display panel, likely to appear in upcoming G4 http://www.androidcentral.com/lg-announces-new-55-inch-qhd-display-likely-appear-upcoming-g4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I was hoping for smaller LG G4 in the range of 5.2-5.3 inches but I guess it will have to be 5.5 inches.  Still can't wait to see the official unveiling to get all the details.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am glad to see they have multiple options for the back cover. Anyone know what is so special about the Quantum IPS display they are talking about?

LG announces new 5.5-inch QHD display panel, likely to appear in upcoming G4 http://www.androidcentral.com/lg-announces-new-55-inch-qhd-display-likely-appear-upcoming-g4

 

Maybe the QHD LCD is an option for the back cover.  The LG G4 4G GL -- just as I predicted.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am interested in the maroon leather back cover.

 

For that, you will have to wait for the maroon G5.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really disappointed that the backs don't have Qi built in, rear facing single speaker, AND perhaps no Quick Charge on these phones?  

 

But overall, I'm very impressed by this device and those camera tweaks seem like actual improvements and not just gimmicks.  Look forward to the reviews and comparison in real life.....especially that RF information. So happy to see that removable battery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...