Jump to content

Coverage map updated - lots more Spark and LTE


dkyeager
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://coverage.spri...TNAV=SJS:HE:Cov

 

Appears to include all Spark areas that were mentioned by Saw: Atlanta, Boston, Las Vegas, Nashville, Portland, San Francisco, San Jose, and Washington, D.C.  Plus those covered by the press:

 

http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2015/02/18/sprint-lte-sprint-spark-network-expansion.html?page=all

 

"The new Sprint Spark markets include:

  • Anderson, Ind.
  • Appleton, Wis.
  • Ashtabula, Ohio
  • Camden, N.J.
  • Champaign-Urbana, Ill.
  • Cleveland, Tenn.
  • Fort Collins-Loveland, Colo.
  • Grants Pass, Ore.
  • Greeley, Colo.
  • Manchester-Nashua, N.H.
  • Monroe, Mich.
  • Muncie, Ind.
  • New Haven-Milford, Conn.
  • Norfolk-Virginia Beach-Newport News, Va.
  • Peabody-Lawrence-Methuen, Mass.
  • Peoria, Ill.
  • Providence, R.I.
  • Raleigh-Cary, N.C.
  • Sandusky, Ohio
  • Shelby, N.C.
  • Spokane, Wash.
  • Springfield, Mass.
  • Springfield, Ill.
  • Zanesville, Ohio"

And even more b41 sites.

 

 

"The new 4G LTE markets include:

  • Batavia, N.Y.
  • Columbia, Mo.
  • Coos Bay, Ore.
  • Flagstaff, Ariz.
  • Jasper, Ind.
  • Lima, Ohio
  • Maui, Hawaii
  • Norwalk, Ohio
  • Orange County, N.Y.
  • Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, Calif.
  • Port Townsend, Wash.
  • Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
  • Pueblo, Colo.
  • Salisbury, Md.
  • Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, Calif.
  • Springfield, Ill.
  • Statesboro, Ga.
  • Talladega-Sylacauga, Ala.
  • Terre Haute, Ind.
  • The Big Island, Hawaii
  • Vail, Colo.
  • Warrensburg, Mo.
  • Washington, D.C.-Arlington-Alexandria, Va.
  • Wheeling, W.Va."

 

This appears to be one of the more accurate maps, at least for my market.  Now includes everything except sites brought up during the last month, which is reasonable.  It is missing sites from other markets that have Spark sites, but have not been launched. Overall, a vast improvement over prior maps. 

 

:tu:  :tu:  Impressive Band 41 coverage. 

 

 

Sprint: :thx:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting... the LTE footprint (orange) in my area has suddenly become much, much more realistic. However, the Spark coverage is now wildly optimistic. Showing yellow (best) coverage where neither 3G (purple) or LTE (orange) coverage is shown.

 

 How about when you zoom in about 3/4 to maximum zoom?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just noticed my area has changed to showing fair, yet we get 50Mbps+ plus turbo is gone from map in this area as well.  Seems like they wiped out some of the Clear B41 coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder what the Spark population count will now be?  at least 150 Million, maybe 175.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it appears the Spark coverage in Wichita Falls is showing up on the map already. Though it is extremely optimistic looking more like what the final product should be once they finish the last couple towers and do the optimization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting... the LTE footprint (orange) in my area has suddenly become much, much more realistic. However, the Spark coverage is now wildly optimistic. Showing yellow (best) coverage where neither 3G (purple) or LTE (orange) coverage is shown.

^This. I barely get b26 in my apartment....Let alone having Excellent Spark coverage. Unless they are planning on putting in some 8t8r here, I don't see that changing. Widly optimistic seems about right.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just checked the updated maps for LA Metro.  I'm of the opinion that something went very wrong with this map update.  The last version that had Turbo depicted was actually very accurate.  This latest update is like a Barnett Newman painting:

 

http://www.wikiart.org/en/barnett-newman/yellow-painting-1949

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spark coverage in this update seems to be extremely optimistic.

 

I agree with this. it states that in my town of Gonzales, CA that I should be surrounded by Band 41. This is not the case. we just barely got band 25 active less than 6 months ago and even then, I cant get LTE inside my house which is located approximately half a mile away. We dont even have CDMA 800 active yet.....unless the recent completion of moving the panels off a temporary tower back to their original location is an indication of this Spark upgrade.

 

edit: I wonder when Robert will update his completion maps. This should give us some better insight.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spark is a lot closer to my home on the maps. Is Spark only B41 on these maps or is it all bands? Because I have B26 already at my home and have had it for a few months but the maps just updated recently.

Only Sprint can answer for certain, but my observations are b26 is and extension of LTE, b41 is Spark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, around here... the Spark for Appleton is surprisingly... accurate.

 

But I will call BS on the orange, there are still a cluster of 4 towers still on 3G only that they are claiming are doing LTE.

 

No way. Nuh uh. I drive past them all frequently and I'm on 3G. It still needs to be purple.

 

Overall though, Spark is moving quickly and that's a GREAT sign!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, around here... the Spark for Appleton is surprisingly... accurate.

 

But I will call BS on the orange, there are still a cluster of 4 towers still on 3G only that they are claiming are doing LTE.

 

No way. Nuh uh. I drive past them all frequently and I'm on 3G. It still needs to be purple.

 

Overall though, Spark is moving quickly and that's a GREAT sign!

What are speeds like?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are speeds like?

 

From the towers I've checked, I've gotten anywhere from low 30's to about 40 on B41, usually with only a -90 to -110 dbm.

 

I know most probably still need backhaul provided to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The parts east of Dallas are a bit over stated but not by much. Got b41 on most of I20 going to and leaving Dallas, once you leave the DFW market on I20 it doesn't appear again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • The powerline tower overlooking downtown Redmond has FINALLY been upgraded. I guess it took this long due to the large birds nest on top of the tower. During the upgrade, they moved all LTE frequencies including B41 to one eNB 84782 and decommissioned eNBs 97521 and 95988. Additionally, the tower finally has all three 5G-SA bands (gNB 1852420). 
    • I have 3 Samsung Galaxy a10e for mapping LTE. For 5G I like the Samsung a32 5g (both factory unlocked).  In both cases try to get one with firmware from the spring of this year.  Then you can use the Samsung Band Selection app no matter what the carrier. Been trying to get my OnePlus Nord n200 5Gs squared away with android 11 and rooted.  OnePlus bought out by Oppo thus service and strategic direction are both problems.  Just getting an e-mail back for the unlock the bootloader process is taking a while. Once we get out of NSA, 5g will be much easier to map. Factory unlocked esim issues are plentiful on high end Samsungs.  My quest is a factory unlocked phone that works well with SCP and Cellmapper for both SA and NSA, with multiple active esims that work easily with MVNOs, functioning VoNR, great reception and transmission, full band support for AT&T and Dish. My next hopeful candidate is the s23.
    • Forgot to mention that I traveled all over the lower Hudson Valley last weekend while using the Verizon eSIM trial to directly both carriers' coverage on one device as opposed to using a second phone. Coverage was virtually the same in my experience with the biggest exception being the Bear Mountain region. All along the Long Mountain Parkway from Woodbury Common going east, coverage remained virtually the same. Both carriers reported similar signal strength going all the way down to 1 bar at the same times but when I arrived at the roundabout near where Long Mountain and Palisades Parkway meet up with one another, Verizon had a much stronger signal compared to T-Mobile's 1 bar. Verizon has a series of sites installed all over Bear Mountain State Park to provide signal to visitors. Unfortunately it doesn't seem like any other carrier attempted to do the same in the 2+ years since they got built. Because of these sites when you're driving on Bear Mountain Bridge and along Bear Mountain Bridge Road going south, Verizon has slightly stronger signal than T-Mobile. — — — — — I'm thinking about buying a burner Android phone to get back into mapping again because I drive around the city a lot and never get the chance to do so. I have a Galaxy S7 Edge in a drawer with an inactive T-Mobile SIM but it doesn't register LTE at all and it doesn't have Band 71 so it's not that useful for me. Any recommendations for phones/plans to map cheaply?
    • So what am I missing???   Why cant i get the s22 ultra do a screen share through cord??  Trying to get it to share to my 10" auto screen. I could enable it with the note 20.. but I cant seem to get this to do it.. All the videos show 1 way, but that setting isnt there.
    • Got the update last night. Broke SCP notifications .... so yay.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...